IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aud/audfin/v22y2024i176p769.html

Comparative Analysis Regarding the Sustainability Reporting Practice in Romania at the Level of Sustainability Reports

Author

Listed:
  • Ovidiu Constantin BUNGET

    (West University of Timisoara, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Department of Accounting and Audit)

  • Alin-Constantin DUMITRESCU

    (West University of Timisoara, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Department of Accounting and Audit)

  • Valentin BURCA

    (West University of Timisoara, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Department of Accounting and Audit)

  • Oana BOGDAN

    (West University of Timisoara, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Department of Accounting and Audit)

  • Mario-Alexandru SOCATIU

    (West University of Timisoara, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Department of Accounting and Audit)

Abstract

There is currently a heated debate surrounding the proliferation of non-financial reporting regulations, which is why there is great concern about the less likely scenario of harmonization of the various reporting frameworks. Increasing efforts to define global or at least regional non-financial reporting regulations and their implementation through reliable corporate reporting systems is limited by the barriers and challenges raised by specific country, industry and company characteristics. The question is how companies adapt to this confusing corporate reporting landscape. The purpose of this paper is to perform a reference analysis regarding the completeness of the reports drawn up from the perspective of the degree of coverage of the GRI checklist. Thus, the Global Reporting Initiative, respectively GRI, developed a template in the form of a checklist for sustainability reporting called the GRI Content Index template, considered a reference element in our analysis regarding sustainability and sustainable development and the mapping of the various SDGs (respectively Sustainable Development Goals known in Romania as Sustainable Development Goals), on a sample of companies listed on the Bucharest Stock Exchange. The purpose of the research is to provide an image of the level of transparency of companies listed on the stock exchange, regarding the sustainability of business models. The methodology used is based on the quantitative analysis of the GRI index and the practical implications of the study mainly reveal the best practices in the field of sustainability reporting, viewed from the perspective of neo-institutional theory, which highlights the coercive, normative and mimetic forces related to sustainability disclosures.

Suggested Citation

  • Ovidiu Constantin BUNGET & Alin-Constantin DUMITRESCU & Valentin BURCA & Oana BOGDAN & Mario-Alexandru SOCATIU, 2024. "Comparative Analysis Regarding the Sustainability Reporting Practice in Romania at the Level of Sustainability Reports," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 22(176), pages 769-782, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:aud:audfin:v:22:y:2024:i:176:p:769
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://revista.cafr.ro/temp/Article_9784.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Yi-Chun & Hung, Mingyi & Wang, Yongxiang, 2018. "The effect of mandatory CSR disclosure on firm profitability and social externalities: Evidence from China," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 169-190.
    2. Hervé Stolowy & Luc Paugam, 2018. "The expansion of non-financial reporting: an exploratory study," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(5), pages 525-548, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wangwei Lin, 2022. "Corporate Non-Financial Reporting in the UK: Diversions from the EU Sustainability Reporting Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Haozhe Song & Gunnar Rimmel, 2025. "Debtholders' reaction to sustainability reporting regulations: International evidence," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 88-115, January.
    3. Fang, Mingyue & Nie, Huihua & Shen, Xinyi, 2023. "Can enterprise digitization improve ESG performance?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    4. Erli Dan & Jianfei Shen, 2022. "Establishment of Corporate Energy Management Systems and Voluntary Carbon Information Disclosure in Chinese Listed Companies: The Moderating Role of Corporate Leaders’ Low-Carbon Awareness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-28, February.
    5. Emmanuel Anyigbah & Yusheng Kong & Bless Kofi Edziah & Ahotovi Thomas Ahoto & Wilhelmina Seyome Ahiaku, 2023. "Board Characteristics and Corporate Sustainability Reporting: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-26, February.
    6. Shujun Chao & Shanyong Wang & Haidong Li & Shu Yang, 2023. "The power of culture: Does Confucian culture contribute to corporate environmental information disclosure?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5), pages 2435-2456, September.
    7. Bin Wang & Chenchen Wei & Longmei Shi & Xiaoqiang Cheng & Xueqin Shi, 2025. "ESG and firm operational efficiency: evidence from Chinese listed companies," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 681-714, January.
    8. Hu, Juncheng, 2021. "Do facilitation payments affect earnings management? Evidence from China," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    9. Jinsong Liu & Jiaren Pang & Xinyi Zhang & Xi Zhou, 2026. "Does Disclosing Well Lead to Doing Good?," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 55(1), pages 121-151, March.
    10. Zhang, Ming-ang & Lu, Shuling & Zhang, Sihan & Bai, Yanfeng, 2023. "The unintended consequence of minimum wage hikes: Evidence based on firms' pollution emission," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    11. Daniel Wörner & Niklas Letmathe & Marin Jovanovic & Thomas Friedli, 2026. "Structuring Private Sustainability Governance: Combining Rule-Based and Goal-Based Mechanisms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 203(3), pages 631-648, January.
    12. Garitta, Claudio & Grassi, Laura, 2025. "Predicting break-even in FinTech startups as a signal for success," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    13. Jiang, Wei & Zhang, Cheng & Si, Chengyu, 2022. "The real effect of mandatory CSR disclosure: Evidence of corporate tax avoidance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    14. Isaac Monday Ikpor & Enrico Bracci & Clementina Iruka Kanu & Riccardo Ievoli & Benedette Okezie & Sunday Mlanga & Charles Ogbaekirigwe, 2022. "Drivers of Sustainability Accounting and Reporting in Emerging Economies: Evidence from Nigeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, March.
    15. Yuyuan Chang & Wen He & Jianling Wang, 2021. "Government Initiated Corporate Social Responsibility Activities: Evidence from a Poverty Alleviation Campaign in China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 173(4), pages 661-685, November.
    16. Monika Klimontowicz & Anna Losa-Jonczyk & Bogna Zacny, 2021. "Banks’ Energy Behavior: Impacts of the Disparity in the Quality and Quantity of the Disclosures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-14, November.
    17. Leonardo Becchetti & Emanuele Bobbio & Federico Prizia & Lorenzo Semplici, 2022. "Going Deeper into the S of ESG: A Relational Approach to the Definition of Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-22, August.
    18. Xu, Si & He, Xiaoyi & Xiong, Feng & Chen, Peiyao, 2024. "CEOs’ early-life famine experience and corporate donations: Evidence from the great Chinese famine," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    19. Boungou, Whelsy & Dufau, Bastien, 2025. "Shareholder wealth effects of corporate sustainability reporting regulations," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    20. Teresa Eugénio & Sónia Gomes & Manuel Castelo Branco & Ana Isabel Morais, 2022. "Non-Financial Reporting and Assurance: A New Opportunity for Auditors? Evidence from Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-15, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics
    • M40 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - General
    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • M42 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Auditing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aud:audfin:v:22:y:2024:i:176:p:769. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dumitru Valentin Florentin (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://revista.cafr.ro/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.