IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aud/audfin/v133y2016i14p65.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of the Auditors’ Rotation on the Accounting Quality in the Case of Romanian Listed Companies under the Transition to IFRS

Author

Listed:
  • Ioan-Bogdan ROBU

    (Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi)

  • Maria GROSU

    (Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi)

  • Costel ISTRATE

    (Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi)

Abstract

In assuring the quality of the financial information issued by the listed companies, the role of the financial auditor is to express his own opinion regarding the compliance of the financial statements with a financial reporting framework. In order for this opinion to be a reliable one, the auditor has to develop it considering the specific requirements of competence, ethic judgment and professional ethics. Meeting these requirements supposes significant efforts from the auditors, and also from the professional organization they are affiliated to, as well as the audited companies. We appreciate that the financial auditors’ financial independence and objectivity are also assured by their periodical rotation. The scope of this study is to analyze and evaluate the influence of the auditor’s rotation on the information value relevance from the individual financial statements and from the consolidated statements that make the subject of financial auditing. The study was carried out on a number of 64 Romanian companies, listed on the Bucharest Stock Exchange, between 2006 and 2014. The research objectives considered the estimation of the auditor’s rotation influence on the value relevance of the reported information of the Romanian BSE listed companies. The results of the study show the fact that the auditor’s rotation significantly contributes to the change of the value relevance degree.

Suggested Citation

  • Ioan-Bogdan ROBU & Maria GROSU & Costel ISTRATE, 2016. "The Effect of the Auditors’ Rotation on the Accounting Quality in the Case of Romanian Listed Companies under the Transition to IFRS," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 14(133), pages 1-65, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:aud:audfin:v:133:y:2016:i:14:p:65
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://revista.cafr.ro/temp/Article_2481.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Choi, Sunhwa & Choi, Youn-Sik & Gul, Ferdinand A. & Lee, Woo-Jong, 2015. "The impact of mandatory versus voluntary auditor switches on stock liquidity: Some Korean evidence," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 100-116.
    2. Sharad Asthana, 2014. "Abnormal audit delays, earnings quality and firm value in the USA," Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(1), pages 21-44, July.
    3. Nicky J. Welton & Howard H. Z. Thom, 2015. "Value of Information," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 35(5), pages 564-566, July.
    4. Regan N. Schmidt & Britney E. Cross, 2014. "The effects of auditor rotation on client management's negotiation strategies," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 29(2), pages 110-130, February.
    5. Lu, Tong & Sivaramakrishnan, K., 2009. "Mandatory audit firm rotation: Fresh look versus poor knowledge," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 71-91.
    6. Daniels, Bobbie W. & Booker, Quinton, 2011. "The effects of audit firm rotation on perceived auditor independence and audit quality," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 78-82.
    7. Kaplan, Steven E. & Mauldin, Elaine G., 2008. "Auditor rotation and the appearance of independence: Evidence from non-professional investors," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 177-192.
    8. Firth, Michael & Rui, Oliver M. & Wu, Xi, 2012. "How Do Various Forms of Auditor Rotation Affect Audit Quality? Evidence from China," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 109-138.
    9. Sikka, Prem, 2015. "The corrosive effects of neoliberalism on the UK financial crises and auditing practices: A dead-end for reforms," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 1-18.
    10. Ahsan Habib, 2013. "A meta-analysis of the determinants of modified audit opinion decisions," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 28(3), pages 184-216, March.
    11. Patrick Velte & Carl-Christian Freidank, 2015. "The link between in- and external rotation of the auditor and the quality of financial accounting and external audit," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 225-246, October.
    12. Prem Sikka, 2015. "The corrosive effects of neoliberalism on the UK financial crises and auditing practices: A dead-end for reforms," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 1-18, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:fst:rfsisf:v:7:y:2022:i:13:p:29-36 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Sailendra SAILENDRA & Etty MURWANINGSARI & Sekar MAYANGSARI, 2019. "The Influence of Free Float Shares and Audit Quality on Company Performance: Evidence from Indonesia," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 17(154), pages 274-274.
    3. IOAN-BOGDAN ROBU & Costel ISTRATE & Mihai CARP & CRISTIAN POPESCU & MIHAELA-ALINA ROBU, 2016. "The Value Relevance Of Financial Information Under The Influence Of Country Risks. The Case Of The Indian Listed Companies," Review of Economic and Business Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 18, pages 77-93, December.
    4. Veronica Grosu & Dorel Mateș & Monica-Laura Zlati & Svetlana Mihaila & Marian Socoliuc & Marius-Sorin Ciubotariu & Simona-Maria Tanasă, 2020. "Econometric Model for Readjusting Significance Threshold Levels through Quick Audit Tests Used on Sustainable Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-32, October.
    5. Mariana-Cristina Bulucea, 2022. "Audit firm rotation and audit quality: a literature review," Journal of Financial Studies, Institute of Financial Studies, vol. 13(7), pages 29-36, November.
    6. Mihai Carp & Costel Istrate, 2021. "Audit Quality under Influences of Audit Firm and Auditee Characteristics: Evidence from the Romanian Regulated Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-16, June.
    7. Andreea Claudia Crucean, 2019. "The Information Content Of Audit Opinion For Users Of Financial Statements," Oradea Journal of Business and Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 4(2), pages 91-101, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:mth:ijafr8:v:9:y:2019:i:1:p:51-73 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. George Silviu CORDOŞ & Melinda Timea FÜLÖP, 2020. "Debates In The Literature Regarding Audit Reporting," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 1(22), pages 1-4.
    3. Mark E. Lokanan & Prerna Sharma, 2023. "Two Decades of Accounting Fraud Research: The Missing Meso-Level Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, September.
    4. Dilek Kaçmaz & Ahmet Türel, 2021. "Audit Quality and Rotation: Perception in Turkey," Istanbul Management Journal, Istanbul University Business School, vol. 0(91), pages 109-122, December.
    5. Mahdi Salehi & Grzegorz Zimon & Hossein Tarighi & Javad Gholamzadeh, 2022. "The Effect of Mandatory Audit Firm Rotation on Earnings Management and Audit Fees: Evidence from Iran," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, February.
    6. Charl de Villiers & Pei‐Chi Kelly Hsiao, 2018. "A review of accounting research in Australasia," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 58(4), pages 993-1026, December.
    7. Madzivire E.T & Nyamwanza L & Mushonga W & Takachicha M. T & Mulonda D, 2020. "An Investigation on the Effectiveness of Forensic Audit as a Tool for Fraud Detection and Prevention," Journal of Accounting, Business and Finance Research, Scientific Publishing Institute, vol. 10(2), pages 49-67.
    8. TINA M. Jose Vega & Dennis M. López, 2012. "Evaluating The Effect Of Industry Specialist Duration On Audit Quality And Audit Fees," Working Papers 0023, College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio.
    9. Athavale, Manoj & Guo, Zhaorui & Meng, Yun & Zhang, Tianshu, 2022. "Diversity of signing auditors and audit quality: Evidence from capital market in China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 554-571.
    10. Santiago Lago-Peñas & Mercedes Mareque Álvarez-Santullano & Elena Rivo-López & Mónica Villanueva-Villar, 2017. "Determining factors for audit opinion in private family and non-family firms. Evidence from Spain," Working Papers. Collection C: Family business 1701, Universidade de Vigo, GEN - Governance and Economics research Network.
    11. Patricia Larres & Martin Kelly, 2023. "A Framework for Authentic Ethical Decision Making in the Face of Grand Challenges: A Lonerganian Gradation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(2), pages 521-533, January.
    12. Elemes, Anastasios & Blaylock, Bradley & Spence, Crawford, 2021. "Tax-motivated profit shifting in big 4 networks: Evidence from Europe," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    13. Vincent Tawiah, 2023. "The Effect of IPSAS Adoption on Governance Quality: Evidence from Developing and Developed Countries," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 305-324, March.
    14. Booker, K., 2018. "Can clients of economically dependent auditors benefit from voluntary audit firm rotation? An experiment with lenders," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 63-67.
    15. Bakre, Owolabi M. & McCartney, Sean & Fayemi, Simeon Olufemi, 2022. "Accounting as a technology of neoliberalism: The accountability role of IPSAS in Nigeria," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    16. Quick, Reiner & Schmidt, Florian, 2018. "Do audit firm rotation, auditor retention, and joint audits matter? – An experimental investigation of bank directors' and institutional investors' perceptions," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 1-21.
    17. Casterella, Jeffrey R. & Johnston, Derek, 2013. "Can the academic literature contribute to the debate over mandatory audit firm rotation?," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 108-116.
    18. Bakre, Owolabi M. & Lauwo, Sarah, 2016. "Privatisation and accountability in a “crony capitalist” Nigerian state," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 45-58.
    19. Mercedes Mareque & Elena Rivo-López & Mónica Villanueva-Villar & Santiago Lago-Peñas, 2019. "Audit Opinions: Are They Really Different for Family Businesses?," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(2), pages 21582440198, June.
    20. Justin Logie & Warren Maroun, 2021. "Evaluating Audit Quality Using the Results of Inspection Processes Performed by an Independent Regulator," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 31(2), pages 128-149, June.
    21. Vincenzo Varriale & Antonello Cammarano & Francesca Michelino & Mauro Caputo, 2021. "Sustainable Supply Chains with Blockchain, IoT and RFID: A Simulation on Order Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    information quality; value relevance; independence; auditor’s rotation; Big4 – Non Big 4; Bucharest Stock Exchange;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C58 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Financial Econometrics
    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • M42 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Auditing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aud:audfin:v:133:y:2016:i:14:p:65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dumitru Valentin Florentin (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://revista.cafr.ro/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.