IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arh/jpopec/v10y2026i2p28-47.html

Family Norms and Female Poverty in South Asia: the Mediating Role of Female Labour Force Participation

Author

Listed:
  • Huma Maqsood

    (University Malaysia Terengganu, Kuala Tarengganu, Malaysia
    SZABIST University, Islamabad, Pakistan)

  • N. F. Che Sulaiman

    (University Malaysia Terengganu, Kuala Tarengganu, Malaysia)

  • Suriyani Muhamad

    (University Malaysia Terengganu, Kuala Tarengganu, Malaysia)

  • Nor A. A. b. Rohaizad

    (University Malaysia Terengganu, Kuala Tarengganu, Malaysia)

Abstract

Introduction: The intersection of poverty and gender manifests in disproportionately high levels of female poverty. In this context, female labour force participation (FLFP) is a critical area of inquiry, particularly regarding gender equality and poverty reduction – key priorities of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, which emphasizes social and economic inclusion. However, empirical research exploring the role of female labour force (FLF) as a mediating factor in women's gendered experiences of poverty – particularly as shaped by traditional family norms in the developing world – remains limited. The present study addresses this gap by examining the dynamics of FLFP and gendered poverty within the socio-cultural context of Pakistan, which is a developing country in South Asia. Methods: Adopting a qualitative research paradigm and a narrative inquiry approach, data were collected from 20 purposively selected female respondents from the labour force in Pakistan. Using Glaser's data collection technique, we conducted semi-structured, in-depth interviews to capture personal experiences and social realities. The data were analysed inductively using a semantic approach, guided by Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis framework. Results: The findings indicate that a combination of patriarchal exploitation and capitalist structures, embedded within the institution of family, systematically marginalises women. This dual dynamic leads to both social exclusion and economic abuse, reinforcing women's socioeconomic dependence and contributing to feminisation of poverty. Conclusion: The intersection of patriarchy and capitalism sustains socio-economic systems in developing countries that depend on a low-cost, compliant female workforce in both private and public spaces. Consequently, women remain economically active yet persistently poor and powerless. Addressing this paradox demands institutional reforms to advance the inclusion goals of Agenda 2030. Policies must target gendered power structures and ensure women's economic participation translates into real empowerment and poverty reduction.

Suggested Citation

  • Huma Maqsood & N. F. Che Sulaiman & Suriyani Muhamad & Nor A. A. b. Rohaizad, 2026. "Family Norms and Female Poverty in South Asia: the Mediating Role of Female Labour Force Participation," Population and Economics, ARPHA Platform, vol. 10(2), pages 28-47, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:arh:jpopec:v:10:y:2026:i:2:p:28-47
    DOI: 10.3897/popecon.10.e138096
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://populationandeconomics.pensoft.net/article/138096/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3897/popecon.10.e138096?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wajid Ali & Ambiya & Devi Prasad Dash, 2023. "Examining the Perspectives of Gender Development and Inequality: A Tale of Selected Asian Economies," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Sen, Amartya, 1995. "Inequality Reexamined," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198289289.
    3. David Mosse, 2010. "A Relational Approach to Durable Poverty, Inequality and Power," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(7), pages 1156-1178.
    4. Soham Sahoo & Stephan Klasen, 2018. "Gender Segregation in Education and Its Implications for Labour Market Outcomes: Evidence from India," Courant Research Centre: Poverty, Equity and Growth - Discussion Papers 248, Courant Research Centre PEG.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rao, Nitya, 2017. "Assets, Agency and Legitimacy: Towards a Relational Understanding of Gender Equality Policy and Practice," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 43-54.
    2. Kitae Yoo, 2023. "The Poisson Method of Poverty Measurement Using Non-monetary Indicators: A Replication Study Based on Australian Data," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 166(1), pages 219-238, February.
    3. E. Wetering & E. Stolk & N. Exel & W. Brouwer, 2013. "Balancing equity and efficiency in the Dutch basic benefits package using the principle of proportional shortfall," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 14(1), pages 107-115, February.
    4. Rory Horner & David Hulme, 2019. "Global Development, Converging Divergence and Development Studies: A Rejoinder," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 50(2), pages 495-510, March.
    5. Isabelle Guérin & Bert D'Espallier & G. Venkatasubramanian, 2015. "The Social Regulation of Markets: Why Microcredit Fails to Promote Jobs in Rural South India," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 46(6), pages 1277-1301, November.
    6. Aprea, Massimo & Raitano, Michele, 2025. "Income inequality in times of high inflation in Europe," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 449-459.
    7. Nat O'Connor, 2018. "Economic inequality, social policy and a good society," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 33(6), pages 583-600, September.
    8. Jean Ryan, 2020. "Examining the Process of Modal Choice for Everyday Travel Among Older People," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-19, January.
    9. Sophie King, 2014. "Cultivating political capabilities among Ugandan smallholders: good governance or popular organisation building?," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series 19314, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    10. Myria Georgiou, 2003. "Mapping diasporic media across the EU: addressing cultural exclusion," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 26420, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Sophie King & Peter Kasaija, 2018. "State-movement partnership in Uganda: Co-producing an enabling environment for urban poverty reduction?," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series esid-098-18, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    12. John Chiwuzulum Odozi & Ruth Uwaifo Oyelere, 2019. "Conflict Exposure and Economic Welfare in Nigeria," HiCN Working Papers 314, Households in Conflict Network.
    13. Martin Mulwa & Timothy Gichana, 2020. "Does education reduce gender differentials in labor market participation? A Kenyan perspective," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 32(3), pages 446-458, September.
    14. Aparna Nair, 2019. "Vaccinating against Vasoori: Eradicating smallpox in the ‘model’ princely state of Travancore, 1804–1946," The Indian Economic & Social History Review, , vol. 56(4), pages 361-386, October.
    15. Hare Krisna Kundo, 2018. "Micro politics of Social Safety Net Programmes: The case of the Food‐For‐Work Programme in Bangladesh," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 36(S2), pages 815-830, September.
    16. Khanna, Madhulika & Majumdar, Shruti, 2020. "Caste-ing wider nets of credit: A mixed methods analysis of informal lending and caste relations in Bihar," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 20(C).
    17. Banerjee, Souvik & Mukhopadhyay, Sankar & Jaiswal, Preeti, 2025. "Motherhood and Labour Market Outcomes: Penalty or Premium?," IZA Discussion Papers 18246, IZA Network @ LISER.
    18. Danuzia Lima Rodrigues & Ricardo Bruno Nascimento dos Santos & Izete Pengo Bagolin & Danilo Araujo Fernandes, 2022. "Multidimensional Poverty: an analysis based on the functionings, dimensions and weights attributed by thefamilies of the Ilha das Onças - Pará, Brazil," Revista Brasileira de Estudos Regionais e Urbanos, Associação Brasileira de Estudos Regionais e Urbanos (ABER), vol. 16(4), pages 492-517.
    19. Joan Costa-i-Font & Frank Cowell, 2019. "Incorporating Inequality Aversion in Health-Care Priority Setting," CESifo Working Paper Series 7503, CESifo.
    20. Heejung Park & Annie Pei‐I. Yu, 2025. "Beyond Economics: Unraveling the Grit-Capability Nexus in Enhancing Quality of Life Across Economic Divides," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 20(2), pages 543-571, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arh:jpopec:v:10:y:2026:i:2:p:28-47. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Teodor Georgiev (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://populationandeconomics.pensoft.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.