IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/apn/alurbn/v6y2022i2p124-137id17433.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrasi Prinsip-Prinsip Islam dalam Kewirausahaan dan Pemasaran: Studi Literatur tentang Motivasi, Pembiayaan, dan Strategi Bisnis Berkelanjutan

Author

Listed:
  • Seger Santoso
  • Ruslaini

Abstract

This study aims to explore the integration of Islamic principles in entrepreneurship and marketing, focusing on motivation, financing, and sustainable business strategies. Using a qualitative literature review approach, the study identifies Islamic values such as amanah (trust), sidq (truthfulness), and justice as the foundation of Muslim entrepreneurs' motivation. In the financing aspect, Sharia-compliant instruments like mudharabah and musharakah are found to provide equitable financial solutions, despite challenges in financial literacy. Islamic marketing strategies, including Islamic branding and halal marketing, significantly contribute to building consumer loyalty and business sustainability. The study highlights the importance of collaboration among entrepreneurs, financial institutions, and policymakers to create an inclusive Islamic business ecosystem. The findings offer conceptual guidance for developing ethical and sustainable Islamic entrepreneurship

Suggested Citation

  • Seger Santoso & Ruslaini, 2022. "Integrasi Prinsip-Prinsip Islam dalam Kewirausahaan dan Pemasaran: Studi Literatur tentang Motivasi, Pembiayaan, dan Strategi Bisnis Berkelanjutan," Al-Urban: Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah dan Filantropi Islam, Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. DR. HAMKA, vol. 6(2), pages 124-137.
    • Handle: RePEc:apn:alurbn:v:6:y:2022:i:2:p:124-137:id:17433
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journal.uhamka.ac.id/index.php/al-urban/article/view/17433
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Snyder, Hannah, 2019. "Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 333-339.
    2. David Moher & Alessandro Liberati & Jennifer Tetzlaff & Douglas G Altman & The PRISMA Group, 2009. "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-6, July.
    3. Richard J. Torraco, 2016. "Writing Integrative Reviews of the Literature: Methods and Purposes," International Journal of Adult Vocational Education and Technology (IJAVET), IGI Global, vol. 7(3), pages 62-70, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beatriz Ferreira & Carla Curado & Mírian Oliveira, 2022. "The Contribution of Knowledge Management to Human Resource Development: a Systematic and Integrative Literature Review," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(3), pages 2319-2347, September.
    2. Maryono, Maryono & Killoes, Aditya Marendra & Adhikari, Rajendra & Abdul Aziz, Ammar, 2024. "Agriculture development through multi-stakeholder partnerships in developing countries: A systematic literature review," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    3. Amal Almansour & Reem Alotaibi & Hajar Alharbi, 2022. "Text-rating review discrepancy (TRRD): an integrative review and implications for research," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Pomerlyan, Evgeniya & Belitski, Maksim, 2023. "Integration - Growth relationship: A literature review and future research agenda using a TCCM approach," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 1106-1118.
    5. Tim Rademaker & Ingo Klingenberg & Stefan Süß, 2025. "Leadership and technostress: a systematic literature review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 75(1), pages 429-494, February.
    6. Hilary Causer & Johanna Spiers & Nikolaos Efstathiou & Stephanie Aston & Carolyn A. Chew-Graham & Anya Gopfert & Kathryn Grayling & Jill Maben & Maria van Hove & Ruth Riley, 2022. "The Impact of Colleague Suicide and the Current State of Postvention Guidance for Affected Co-Workers: A Critical Integrative Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-24, September.
    7. Kusha Sharma & Dr. Madhuri Hooda, 2023. "The New Elective of National Cadet Corps (NCC): A Review of Literature," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(7), pages 384-396, July.
    8. Shuchi Pahuja & Anita Agrawal, 2023. "Board Attributes and Corporate Social Responsibility: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Perspectives," Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, , vol. 16(1), pages 108-138, June.
    9. Uchendu Eugene Chigbu & Sulaiman Olusegun Atiku & Cherley C. Du Plessis, 2023. "The Science of Literature Reviews: Searching, Identifying, Selecting, and Synthesising," Publications, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, January.
    10. Appiah, Emmanuel Kusi & Gabrielsson, Peter & Rialp Criado, Alex, 2025. "The role of digitalization in early internationalization Research: A systematic literature review and future research directions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    11. Hosany, A. R. Shaheen & Hosany, Sameer & He, Hongwei, 2022. "Children sustainable behaviour: A review and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 236-257.
    12. Lenart-Gansiniec Regina, 2022. "The dilemmas of systematic literature review: the context of crowdsourcing in science," International Journal of Contemporary Management, Sciendo, vol. 58(1), pages 11-21, March.
    13. Lydia Novoszel & Tina Wakolbinger, 2022. "Meta-analysis of Supply Chain Disruption Research," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-25, March.
    14. Lars Fuglsang & Anne Vorre Hansen & Ines Mergel & Maria Taivalsaari Røhnebæk, 2021. "Living Labs for Public Sector Innovation: An Integrative Literature Review," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, June.
    15. Jianbo Han & Edwin H. W. Chan & Esther H. K. Yung & Queena K. Qian & Patrick T. I. Lam, 2022. "A Policy Framework for Producing Age-Friendly Communities from the Perspective of Production of Space," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-23, February.
    16. Agnieszka A. Tubis & Honorata Poturaj & Anna Smok, 2024. "Interaction between a Human and an AGV System in a Shared Workspace—A Literature Review Identifying Research Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-21, January.
    17. Hetemäki, L. & D'Amato, D. & Giurca, A. & Hurmekoski, E., 2024. "Synergies and trade-offs in the European forest bioeconomy research: State of the art and the way forward," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    18. Vespestad, May Kristin & Clancy, Anne, 2021. "Exploring the use of content analysis methodology in consumer research," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    19. Biniam Getnet Agazu & Chalchissa Amentie Kero & Kenenisa Lemi Debela, 2025. "Transformational leadership and firm performance: a systematic literature review," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-28, December.
    20. Assunta Di Vaio & Sabrina Palladino & Elisa Van Engelenhoven, 2025. "Digital Twins nei Sistemi Portuali e il contributo di GHG accounting: Una review della letteratura," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2025(1), pages 211-236.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:apn:alurbn:v:6:y:2022:i:2:p:124-137:id:17433. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Susilo (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journal.uhamka.ac.id/index.php/al-urban/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.