IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aoq/ekonom/y2025i4p545-563.html

Wybrane czynniki podejścia gospodarstw domowych do ubezpieczania ryzyka powodziowego w świetle badań ankietowych

Author

Listed:
  • Patrycja Kowalczyk-Rólczyńska
  • Maria Forlicz
  • Łukasz Kuźmiński
  • Michał Nadolny
  • Zdzisław Kes

Abstract

Powodzie występujące na całym świecie powodują szkody szacowane na setki miliardów dolarów, a zmiany klimatu wpływają na wzrost ich dotkliwości. W konsekwencji powstaje presja na wykorzystywanie narzędzi ograniczających ryzyka związane ze skutkami takich katastrof naturalnych. Literatura wskazuje, że dostępne formy transferu ryzyka powodziowego w ujęciu finansowym są wykorzystywane w ograniczonym zakresie przez gospodarstwa domowe. Celem niniejszego artykułu jest identyfikacja czynników wpływających na postawy ubezpieczeniowe w kontekście ubezpieczenia ryzyka powodziowego. Badania koncertują się na odpowiedzi na pytania: czy skłonność do ubezpieczania się od ryzyka powodziowego zależy od bogactwa gospodarstwa domowego, czy ubezpieczeni i nieubezpieczeni mają inny stosunek do udzielania osobom poszkodowanym w powodzi pomocy publicznej oraz jak osoby ubezpieczone postrzegają koszt polisy od zagrożeń powodzią. W opisanych badaniach wykorzystano narzędzie badawcze w postaci kwestionariusza ankiety, który został wypełniony przez 657 mieszkańców domów jednorodzinnych zlokalizowanych na obszarach, na których w latach 2015–2020 doszło do zdarzeń powodziowych.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrycja Kowalczyk-Rólczyńska & Maria Forlicz & Łukasz Kuźmiński & Michał Nadolny & Zdzisław Kes, 2025. "Wybrane czynniki podejścia gospodarstw domowych do ubezpieczania ryzyka powodziowego w świetle badań ankietowych," Ekonomista, Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne, issue 4, pages 545-563.
    • Handle: RePEc:aoq:ekonom:y:2025:i:4:p:545-563
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ekonomista.pte.pl/pdf-203634-125567
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Browne, Mark J & Hoyt, Robert E, 2000. "The Demand for Flood Insurance: Empirical Evidence," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 291-306, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kendra Marcoux & Katherine R. H. Wagner, 2023. "Fifty Years of U.S. Natural Disaster Insurance Policy," CESifo Working Paper Series 10431, CESifo.
    2. Howard Kunreuther & Erwann Michel-Kerjan, 2015. "Demand for fixed-price multi-year contracts: Experimental evidence from insurance decisions," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 171-194, October.
    3. Guido Borzi & Lucía Santucci & Carolina Tanjal & Eleonora Carol, 2020. "Assessment of surface runoff conditioned by road works and urban settlements in large plain basins," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 101(3), pages 981-994, April.
    4. Susanne Hanger & Joanne Linnerooth‐Bayer & Swenja Surminski & Cristina Nenciu‐Posner & Anna Lorant & Radu Ionescu & Anthony Patt, 2018. "Insurance, Public Assistance, and Household Flood Risk Reduction: A Comparative Study of Austria, England, and Romania," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(4), pages 680-693, April.
    5. Timo Goeschl & Shunsuke Managi, 2019. "Public in-Kind Relief and Private Self-Insurance," Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 3-21, April.
    6. Robert W. Klein & Harold Weston, 2020. "Government insurance for business interruption losses from pandemics: An evaluation of its feasibility and possible frameworks," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 23(4), pages 401-440, December.
    7. Shi-jie Jiang & Feiyun Xiang & Iris Yang, 2023. "Effect of Prevention Focus on the Relationships Among Driving Accident History, Risk Perception, and Consumers’ Automobile Insurance Coverage Decisions," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, July.
    8. Garbarino, Nicola & Guin, Benjamin, 2021. "High water, no marks? Biased lending after extreme weather," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    9. Achtnicht Martin & Osberghaus Daniel, 2019. "The Demand for Index-Based Flood Insurance in a High-Income Country," German Economic Review, De Gruyter, vol. 20(2), pages 217-242, May.
    10. Md. Shakhawat Hossain, 2025. "Assessing smallholder farmers’ flood risk behavior and their willingness to pay for crop insurance as a risk coping strategy in northern Bangladesh," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(4), pages 4191-4217, March.
    11. Surminski, Swenja, 2014. "The role of insurance in reducing direct risk: the case of flood insurance," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 60764, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Marielle Brunette & Stéphane Couture & Jérôme Foncel & Serge S. Garcia, 2017. "Insurance decision against forest fire : An econometric analysis combining experimental and real data," Post-Print hal-02785187, HAL.
    13. Md. Shakhawat Hossain, 2024. "Assessing the viability of the non-monetary flood insurance market for Bangladeshi smallholder farmers," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(7), pages 6059-6080, May.
    14. Phung Thanh Binh & Xueqin Zhu & Rolf Groeneveld & Ekko van Ierland, 2016. "Mediation Analysis of Factors that Influence Household Flood Mitigation Behavior in Developing Countries: Evidence from the Mekong Delta, Vietnam," EEPSEA Research Report rr20160311, Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia (EEPSEA), revised Mar 2016.
    15. Andreas Richter & Jochen Ruß & Stefan Schelling, 2019. "Insurance customer behavior: Lessons from behavioral economics," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 22(2), pages 183-205, July.
    16. Mahmud, Sakib & Hassan, Gazi, 2014. "Consequences of Public Programs and Private Transfers on Household’s Investment in Storm Protection," MPRA Paper 60004, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Erwann O. Michel‐Kerjan & Carolyn Kousky, 2010. "Come Rain or Shine: Evidence on Flood Insurance Purchases in Florida," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 77(2), pages 369-397, June.
    18. Osberghaus, Daniel & Reif, Christiane, 2021. "How do different compensation schemes and loss experience affect insurance decisions? Experimental evidence from two independent and heterogeneous samples," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    19. Thomas Dudek & Eric R. Ulm & Ilan Noy, 2021. "Demand for Multi-Year Catastrophe Insurance Contracts: Experimental Evidence for Mitigating the Insurance Gap," CESifo Working Paper Series 9442, CESifo.
    20. Ahmed Tauqeer Zahid & Farooq AhmadKhan, 2017. "Cost Mitigation of Natural Disasters through Insurance," Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, Educational Research Multimedia & Publications,India, vol. 8(3), pages 16-25, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G22 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Insurance; Insurance Companies; Actuarial Studies
    • H84 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Disaster Aid
    • Q59 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Other
    • R29 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Household Analysis - - - Other
    • R59 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aoq:ekonom:y:2025:i:4:p:545-563. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tomasz Kwarcinski (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pteeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.