IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aiy/journl/v1y2015i4p573-586.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empirical analysis of the integration activity of business structures in the regions of Russia

Author

Listed:
  • Karelina, M. G.

Abstract

The article investigates the integration activity of business structures in the regions of Russia. A wide variety of approaches to study the problems and prospects of economic integration and the current dispute on the role of integration processes in the regional economic development determined the complexity in the review of the concepts «integration» and «integration activities» in order to form objective conditions to analyse the integration activity of business structures in the Russian regions. The monitoring of the current legal system of the Russian Federation carried out in the area of statistics and compiling statistical databases on mergers and acquisitions showed the absence of formal executive authority dealing with the compiling collections of information on the integration activity at the regional level. In this connection, the data of Russian information and analytical agencies made the information base of the research. As research tools, we used methods of the analysis of structural changes, methods of the analysis of economic differentiation and concentration, methods of non-parametric statistics. The article shows the close relationship between the social and economic development of the subjects of Russia and integrated business structures functioning on its territory. An investigation of the integration activity structure and dynamics in the subjects of the Russian Federation based on statistical data for the period from 2003 to 2012 has revealed the increasing heterogeneity of the integration activity of business structures in the regions of Russia. The hypothesis of a substantial divergence of the mergers and acquisitions of corporate structures in Russian regions has been confirmed by high values of the Gini coefficient, the Herfindahl index and the decile coefficient of differentiation. The research results are of practical importance, since they can be used to improve the existing federal programs aimed at evening-out disproportions in the social and economic development of Russian regions. The qualitative infrastructure formation of the merger and acquisition market and the development of regional policies in order to increase the competitiveness of Russian regions can be possible on the basis of the analysis presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Karelina, M. G., 2015. "Empirical analysis of the integration activity of business structures in the regions of Russia," R-Economy, Ural Federal University, Graduate School of Economics and Management, vol. 1(4), pages 573-586.
    • Handle: RePEc:aiy:journl:v:1:y:2015:i:4:p:573-586
    DOI: 10.15826/recon.2015.4.020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10995/47437
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15826/recon.2015.4.020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dorfman, Robert, 1979. "A Formula for the Gini Coefficient," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 61(1), pages 146-149, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aleksandr Kokovikhin & Ekaterina Ogorodnikova & Dina Williams & Andrey Plakhin, 2018. "Assessment of the Competitive Environment in the Regional Markets," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(1), pages 79-94.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guo Chen & Amy K Glasmeier & Min Zhang & Yang Shao, 2016. "Urbanization and Income Inequality in Post-Reform China: A Causal Analysis Based on Time Series Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, July.
    2. Amirarsalan Rajabi & Alexander V. Mantzaris & Kuldip Singh Atwal & Ivan Garibay, 2021. "Exploring the disparity of influence between users in the discussion of Brexit on Twitter," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 903-917, November.
    3. Daymard, Arnaud, 2022. "Land rental market reforms: Can they increase outmigration from agriculture? Evidence from a quantitative model," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    4. Boyce, James K. & Zwickl, Klara & Ash, Michael, 2016. "Measuring environmental inequality," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 114-123.
    5. Heinrich H. Nax & Ryan O. Murphy & Stefano Duca & Dirk Helbing, 2017. "Contribution-Based Grouping under Noise," Games, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-23, November.
    6. Ozgur Ekmekci, 2013. "Equality of Outcome or Equality of Opportunity? A Simulation of Wealth Distribution Using Agent-based Modeling," Research in World Economy, Research in World Economy, Sciedu Press, vol. 4(2), pages 1-11, September.
    7. Rachida Hennani & Michel Terraza, 2015. "Contributions of a noisy chaotic model to the stressed Value-at-Risk," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 35(2), pages 1262-1273.
    8. Saqalli, M. & Gérard, B. & Bielders, C.L. & Defourny, P., 2011. "Targeting rural development interventions: Empirical agent-based modeling in Nigerien villages," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 104(4), pages 354-364, April.
    9. Xiaotong Sun & Charalampos Stasinakis & Georigios Sermpinis, 2022. "Decentralization illusion in Decentralized Finance: Evidence from tokenized voting in MakerDAO polls," Papers 2203.16612, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2023.
    10. Sang T. Truong & Humberto Barreto, 2023. "Teaching Income Inequality with Data-Driven Visualization," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 68(1), pages 140-155, March.
    11. Saqalli, M. & Gérard, B. & Bielders, C. & Defourny, P., 2010. "Testing the impact of social forces on the evolution of Sahelian farming systems: A combined agent-based modeling and anthropological approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(22), pages 2714-2727.
    12. Davide Fiaschi & Marzia Romanelli, 2009. "Nonlinear Dynamics in Welfare and the Evolution of World Inequality," Discussion Papers 2009/81, Dipartimento di Economia e Management (DEM), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
    13. Zhonghao Zhang & Shimeng Sun & Wanzhen Chen & Xuesong He, 2023. "Spatiotemporal patterns in China's Minimal Living allowances: The urban‐rural gap and regional differences revealed through a national poverty alleviation program," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 214-233, March.
    14. Theuri, Joseph & Olukuru, John, 2022. "The impact of Artficial Intelligence and how it is shaping banking," KBA Centre for Research on Financial Markets and Policy Working Paper Series 61, Kenya Bankers Association (KBA).
    15. Goldhaber, Dan & Choi, Hyung-Jai & Cramer, Lauren, 2007. "A descriptive analysis of the distribution of NBPTS-certified teachers in North Carolina," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 160-172, April.
    16. Quentin L. Burrell, 2007. "Time-dependent aspects of co-concentration in informetrics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 73(2), pages 161-174, November.
    17. Amit Pandey & Anil Kumar Sharma, 2023. "Effect of Index Concentration on Index Volatility and Performance," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 30(3), pages 559-585, September.
    18. Tharcisio Leone, 2019. "Intergenerational Mobility in Education: Estimates of the Worldwide Variation," Journal of Economic Development, Chung-Ang Unviersity, Department of Economics, vol. 44(4), pages 1-42, December.
    19. Tanhua Jin & Kailai Wang & Yanan Xin & Jian Shi & Ye Hong & Frank Witlox, 2023. "Is A 15-minute City within Reach in the United States? An Investigation of Activity-Based Mobility Flows in the 12 Most Populous US Cities," Papers 2310.14383, arXiv.org.
    20. Hai Fang & John A. Rizzo, 2012. "Does inequality in China affect health differently in high- versus low-income households?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(9), pages 1081-1090, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aiy:journl:v:1:y:2015:i:4:p:573-586. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Irina Turgel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/seurfru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.