IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ahc/journl/y2022id1611.html

Managing the social capital of the organization: problems of the practical application of the new paradigm of management and the ways of their solution

Author

Listed:
  • B. A. B. Balchat
  • A. Z. Gusov

Abstract

The publication examines the theoretical aspects and practical problems of social capital management at the corporate level. The concept of social capital, its differences from other aspects of the management of intangible capital of modern organizations is presented. The reasons for insufficient attention to social capital management in the practice of corporate management have been clarified. Based on the results of the analysis of social reporting of 18 largest companies–leaders in key sectors of the economy, it is shown that key corporate entities acting as drivers of the socio–economic development of the Russian Federation are not involved in the practice of social capital management. The directions of social capital management are substantiated, the place in the ESG system is determined, and the directions for assessing social capital are proposed. It is concluded that, despite insufficient practical development, social capital management is intended to become a promising and significant area of corporate management in the ESG direction.

Suggested Citation

  • B. A. B. Balchat & A. Z. Gusov, 2022. "Managing the social capital of the organization: problems of the practical application of the new paradigm of management and the ways of their solution," Entrepreneur’s Guide, JSC “Publishing Agency “Science and Educationâ€, vol. 15(1).
    • Handle: RePEc:ahc:journl:y:2022:id:1611
    DOI: 10.24182/2073-9885-2022-15-1-107-113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.pp-mag.ru/jour/article/viewFile/1611/1578
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24182/2073-9885-2022-15-1-107-113?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Incheol Kim & Hong Wan & Bin Wang & Tina Yang, 2019. "Institutional Investors and Corporate Environmental, Social, and Governance Policies: Evidence from Toxics Release Data," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(10), pages 4901-4926, October.
    2. Baruch Lev & Christine Petrovits & Suresh Radhakrishnan, 2010. "Is doing good good for you? how corporate charitable contributions enhance revenue growth," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 182-200, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiao, Jie & Tong, Lin & Yan, An, 2025. "Trading for good: How active mutual funds influence corporate social responsibility through stock trading," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    2. Jared F. Egginton & Garrett A. McBrayer, 2019. "Does it pay to be forthcoming? Evidence from CSR disclosure and equity market liquidity," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(2), pages 396-407, March.
    3. Chen, Jun & Dong, Wang & Tong, Yixing & Zhang, Feida, 2020. "Corporate philanthropy and corporate misconduct: Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 17-31.
    4. Byungki Kim & Jinhan Pae & Choong-Yuel Yoo, 2019. "Business Groups and Tunneling: Evidence from Corporate Charitable Contributions by Korean Companies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(3), pages 643-666, February.
    5. Jinchi Liu & Xiong Xiong & Ya Gao & Jin Zhang, 2023. "The impact of institutional investors on ESG: Evidence from China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(S2), pages 2801-2826, June.
    6. Jean Kabongo & Kiyoung Chang & Ying Li, 2013. "The Impact of Operational Diversity on Corporate Philanthropy: An Empirical Study of U.S. Companies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 116(1), pages 49-65, August.
    7. Lavinia Conca & Francesco Manta & Domenico Morrone & Pierluigi Toma, 2021. "The impact of direct environmental, social, and governance reporting: Empirical evidence in European‐listed companies in the agri‐food sector," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 1080-1093, February.
    8. Zohreh Alizadehrad & Ekaterine Maglakelidze, 2020. "Conceptual Model Explaining the Impact of Corporate CSR Awareness (Involvement) on Consumer Behavior," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 10612988, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    9. Hui-Cheng Yu & Lopin Kuo, 2021. "Corporate Philanthropy Strategy and Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-10, May.
    10. Balietti, Anca & Zeising, Tom, 2024. "Racial Disparities in Environmental Auditing," Working Papers 0745, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
    11. Felice Petruzzella & Anastasia Giakoumelou & Vitiana L'Abate & Nicola Raimo & Filippo Vitolla, 2024. "Fostering firm value: Unpacking the effect of circular economy disclosure via social media," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(8), pages 7960-7971, December.
    12. Dunbar, Craig & Li, Zhichuan (Frank) & Shi, Yaqi, 2020. "CEO risk-taking incentives and corporate social responsibility," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    13. Woźniak, Justyna, 2022. "Corporate vs. Corporate foundation as a support tool in the area of social responsibility strategy – Polish mining case," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    14. Gagalyuk, Taras & Chatalova, Lioudmila & Kalyuzhnyy Oleksandr, . "Broadening the scope of instrumental motivations for CSR disclosure: an illustration for agroholdings in transition economies," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 24(4).
    15. Alan Muller & Gail Whiteman, 2016. "Corporate Philanthropic Responses to Emergent Human Needs: The Role of Organizational Attention Focus," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 137(2), pages 299-314, August.
    16. Magnus Schauf & Eline Schoonjans, 2022. "Better Safe than Sorry: Toxic Waste Management after Unionization," Working Papers 220, Bavarian Graduate Program in Economics (BGPE).
    17. Yahui An & Zezheng Qin, 2023. "Can local social norms motivate green innovation: Evidence from China," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(6), pages 3572-3584, September.
    18. Desai, Naman & Pingali, Viswanath & Tripathy, Arindam, 2015. "Is 2% the Solution? Experimental Evidence on the New CSR Rule in India," IIMA Working Papers WP2015-03-09, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    19. Lai Van Vo & Huong Thi Thu Le & Youngbin Kim, 2023. "Board interlocks, career prospects and corporate social responsibility," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(4), pages 4565-4595, December.
    20. Nadia Gulko & Catriona Hyde, 2022. "Corporate perspectives on CSR disclosure: audience, materiality, motivations," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(4), pages 389-412, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ahc:journl:y:2022:id:1611. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ð ÐµÐ´Ð°ÐºÑ†Ð¸Ñ (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.