IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/wjagec/32301.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are Current U.S. Farm Commodity Programs Outdated? Arguments In The Negative

Author

Listed:
  • Knutson, Ronald D.

Abstract

Over the next two decades a level of government involvement in agriculture comparable to that of the past two decades can be justified. Indigenous, cyclical, and secular characteristics of agriculture provide a strong defense of this position. Abandoning commodity programs would have adverse consequences. A realistic set of policy goals is presented and suggestions for fine-tuning government programs are offered.

Suggested Citation

  • Knutson, Ronald D., 1985. "Are Current U.S. Farm Commodity Programs Outdated? Arguments In The Negative," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 10(2), pages 1-9, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:wjagec:32301
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.32301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/32301/files/10020270.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.32301?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Milligan, Robert & Lesser, William H. & Magrath, William B. & Bauman, Dale, 1984. "Biotechnology and the Dairy Industry: Production Costs and Commercial Potential of the Bovine Growth Hormone," Research Bulletins 184066, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    2. Luther Tweeten, 1983. "Economic Instability in Agriculture: The Contributions of Prices, Government Programs and Exports," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 65(5), pages 922-931.
    3. James D. Johnson & Sara D. Short, 1983. "Commodity Programs: Who Has Received the Benefits?," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 65(5), pages 912-921.
    4. G. Edward Schuh, 1981. "The foreign trade linkages," Proceedings – Rural and Agricultural Conferences, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, pages 71-102.
    5. Wayne D. Rasmussen, 1983. "The New Deal Farm Programs: What They Were and Why They Survived," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 65(5), pages 1158-1162.
    6. Don Paarlberg, 1983. "Effects of New Deal Farm Programs on the Agricultural Agenda a Half Century Later and Prospect for the Future," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 65(5), pages 1163-1167.
    7. Maury E. Bredahl & William H. Meyers & Keith J. Collins, 1979. "The Elasticity of Foreign Demand for U.S. Agricultural Products: The Importance of the Price Transmission Elasticity," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 61(1), pages 58-63.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ayer, Harry W., 1985. "Are Current Commodity Programs Outdated? Comments On The Knutson And Tweeten Arguments," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 10(2), pages 1-3, December.
    2. Robinson, Bobby H., 1984. "Fifty Years of Farm Policy: What have we Learned?," Working Papers 117655, Clemson University, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    3. Duffy, Patricia A., 1997. "Is The New Deal Dead? Government, Economics, And The Rural South," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 29(1), pages 1-15, July.
    4. Gardiner, Walter H. & Dixit, Praveen M, 1987. "Price Elasticity of Export Demand: Concepts and Estimates," Foreign Agricultural Economic Report (FAER) 305286, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    5. Freebairn, John & Rausser, Gordon C. & de Gorter, Harry, 1981. "Government Intervention And Food Price Inflation," 1981 Annual Meeting, July 26-29, Clemson, South Carolina 279333, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    6. Henry Kinnucan & Øystein Myrland, 2008. "On generic vs. brand promotion of farm products in foreign markets," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(6), pages 673-684.
    7. Mahama, Ramatu, 1985. "A stochastic simulation of the impact of price insulation policies on world wheat market stability," ISU General Staff Papers 198501010800008868, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    8. Nunez, Hector M. & Onal, Hayri & Khanna, Madhu, 2012. "A prospective analysis of Brazilian biofuel economy: land use and infrastructure development," 2012 Conference, August 18-24, 2012, Foz do Iguacu, Brazil 126811, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Richardson, James W. & Duffy, Patricia A. & Wohlgenant, Michael K., 1986. "An Analysis Of Export Expansion Programs For Cotton," 1986 Annual Meeting, July 27-30, Reno, Nevada 278131, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    10. Kaiser, Harry M., 1992. "Market Impacts Of Bovine Somatropin: A Supply And Demand Analysis," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 24(1), pages 1-12, July.
    11. Ronald A. Babula & Fred J. Ruppel & David A. Bessler, 1995. "U.S. corn exports: the role of the exchange rate," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 13(2), pages 75-88, November.
    12. Koo, Won W. & Golz, Joel T. & Uhm, Ihn H., 1991. "United States and Canadian Free Trade Agreement: Economic Implications," Agricultural Economics Reports 23210, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    13. J. M. Gil & B. Dhehibi & M. Ben Kaabia & A. M. Angulo, 2004. "Non-stationarity and the import demand for virgin olive oil in the European Union," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(16), pages 1859-1869.
    14. Wanissa Suanin, 2021. "Demand Elasticity of Processed Food Exports from Developing Countries: A Panel Analysis of US Imports," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(2), pages 413-429, June.
    15. Williams, Gary W. & Shumway, C. Richard & Love, H. Alan, 2002. "Returns to Soybean Producers from Investments in Promotion and Research," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 31(1), pages 1-15, April.
    16. Gregory W. Arburn & C. Parr Rosson & James C. O. Nyankori, 1991. "Soybean production and trade policy changes in Argentina and Brazil: Implications for the competitive position of the United States," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 7(5), pages 489-502.
    17. Surabhi Mittal, 2007. "OECD Agricultural Trade Reforms Impact On India's Prces and Producer's Welfare," Working Papers id:1072, eSocialSciences.
    18. Rauseer, Gordon C. & Zilberman, David & Just, Richard E., 1981. "The Distributional Impacts of Agricultural Programs," AAEA Miscellaneous Paper Archive 337331, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    19. Peterson, E. Wesley F. & Viscencio-Brambila, Hector & Fuller, Stephen, 1988. "A Welfare Analysis of Port User Fees: The Case of Grain and Soybean Exports," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(2), pages 101-108, December.
    20. Sun, Theresa & Myers, Lester, 1985. "A Waterway Tax on Grains: A Functional Market Analysis," Technical Bulletins 156820, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:wjagec:32301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/waeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.