IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ssaaea/232750.html

Determinants of Bristol Bay Sockeye Demand and Ex-Vessel Price Implications Based on Key Market-Clearing Factors

Author

Listed:
  • Seeger, Riley Martin

Abstract

Fishermen, as price-taking producers in a perfectly competitive fishing market, are at the mercy of many and biological market factors that effectively determine the price they receive for their catch. In the world’s largest Sockeye salmon fishery of Bristol Bay, Alaska, ex-vessel price (the price fishermen receive) has a high degree of volatility subject to market and biological conditions of the fishery. This research article highlights the significance of many different factors that affect the final ex-vessel price that fishermen in Bristol Bay, Alaska receive for their catch in order to allow for more efficient fishing production decisions. Time-series data collected predominately from the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, among other sources, is statistically analyzed using Ordinary Least Squares regression. The results obtained from the analysis suggest that salmon export markets, inputs to production, and substitute goods influence the ex-vessel price of Bristol Bay sockeye salmon.

Suggested Citation

  • Seeger, Riley Martin, 2015. "Determinants of Bristol Bay Sockeye Demand and Ex-Vessel Price Implications Based on Key Market-Clearing Factors," SS-AAEA Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 2015, pages 1-25.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ssaaea:232750
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.232750
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/232750/files/RileyMartinSeeger_final.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.232750?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Homans, Frances R. & Wilen, James E., 1997. "A Model of Regulated Open Access Resource Use," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Valderrama, Diego & Anderson, James L., 2010. "Market interactions between aquaculture and common-property fisheries: Recent evidence from the Bristol Bay sockeye salmon fishery in Alaska," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(2), pages 115-128, March.
    3. Sunny L. Jardine & C.-Y. Cynthia Lin & James N. Sanchirico, 2014. "Measuring Benefits from a Marketing Cooperative in the Copper River Fishery," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 96(4), pages 1084-1101.
    4. Biing-Hwan Lin & Mark Herrmann & Tsae-Yun Lin & Ron C. Mittelhammer, 1989. "Forecasting the price of farmed Atlantic salmon: An integrated econometric and time series approach," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 5(5), pages 477-488.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Asche, Frank & Smith, Martin D., 2018. "Viewpoint: Induced Innovation in Fisheries and Aquaculture," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1-7.
    2. Andries Richter & Anne Maria Eikeset & Daan Soest & Florian Klaus Diekert & Nils Chr. Stenseth, 2018. "Optimal Management Under Institutional Constraints: Determining a Total Allowable Catch for Different Fleet Segments in the Northeast Arctic Cod Fishery," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 69(4), pages 811-835, April.
    3. Vårdal, Erling & Asche, Frank & Straume, Hans-Martin, "undated". "Perish or prosper: Trade patterns for highly perishable products," 2017 International Congress, August 28-September 1, 2017, Parma, Italy 261278, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Frank Asche & Hans‐Martin Straume & Erling Vårdal, 2021. "Perish or prosper: Trade patterns for highly perishable seafood products," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(4), pages 876-890, October.
    5. Cloé Garnache, 2015. "Fish, Farmers, and Floods: Coordinating Institutions to Optimize the Provision of Ecosystem Services," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 2(3), pages 367-399.
    6. Asche, Frank & Smith, Martin D., 2010. "Trade and fisheries: Key issues for the World Trade Organization," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2010-03, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    7. Oglend, Atle & Asche, Frank & Straume, Hans-Martin, 2024. "Rent formation and distortions due to quotas in biological production processes," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    8. Jasper Grashuis, 2019. "Spatial Competition in the Iowa Corn Market: Informing the Pricing Behavior of Corporate and Cooperative Grain Merchants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-13, February.
    9. Yue Tan & Sunny L. Jardine, 2019. "Considering Economic Efficiency in Ecosystem-Based Management: The Case of Horseshoe Crabs in Delaware Bay," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 72(2), pages 511-538, February.
    10. Eli P. Fenichel & Joshua K. Abbott, 2014. "Natural Capital: From Metaphor to Measurement," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(1), pages 1-27.
    11. Nygaard, Rune & Roll, Kristin H., 2024. "Cross-hedging wild salmon prices," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 33(C).
    12. José Da Rocha & María Gutiérrez, 2012. "Endogenous Fishery Management in a Stochastic Model: Why Do Fishery Agencies Use TACs Along with Fishing Periods?," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 53(1), pages 25-59, September.
    13. Kumse, Kaittisak & Suzuki, Nobuhiro & Sato, Takeshi & Demont, Matty, 2021. "The spillover effect of direct competition between marketing cooperatives and private intermediaries: Evidence from the Thai rice value chain," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    14. Asche, Frank & Bellemare, Marc F. & Roheim, Cathy & Smith, Martin D. & Tveteras, Sigbjørn, 2015. "Fair Enough? Food Security and the International Trade of Seafood," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 151-160.
    15. Staffan Waldo & Anton Paulrud, 2017. "Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Fisheries: The Case of Multiple Regulatory Instruments in Sweden," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 68(2), pages 275-295, October.
    16. Anastasios Xepapadeas & Catarina Roseta-Palma, 2013. "Instabilities and robust control in natural resource management," Portuguese Economic Journal, Springer;Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestao, vol. 12(3), pages 161-180, December.
    17. Martin F. Quaas & Max T. Stoeven & Bernd Klauer & Thomas Petersen & Johannes Schiller, 2018. "Windows of Opportunity for Sustainable Fisheries Management: The Case of Eastern Baltic Cod," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 70(2), pages 323-341, June.
    18. Asche, Frank & Zhang, Dengjun, 2013. "Testing Structural Changes in the U.S. Whitefish Import Market: An Inverse Demand System Approach," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 42(3), pages 453-470, December.
    19. Smith, Martin D. & Zhang, Junjie & Coleman, Felicia C., 2005. "Bayesian Bioeconomics of Marine Reserves," 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI 19409, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    20. Da Rocha, José María & Gutiérrez Huerta, María José, 2010. "Endogenous fisheries management in a stochastic model: Why do fishery agencies use TAC," DFAEII Working Papers 1988-088X, University of the Basque Country - Department of Foundations of Economic Analysis II.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ssaaea:232750. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.