IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/reowae/401189.html

Economic Effects of Using Improved Maize Varieties, Inorganic Fertilizer and Goat Manure in Smallholder Farms: Evidence from Field Evaluations in Southern Ghana

Author

Listed:
  • Esther, Marfo-Ahenkora
  • Godwin Y., Ameleke
  • Kingsley J., Taah
  • Elvis, Asare-Bediako
  • Charles Y.F., Domozoro

Abstract

Maize is a key cereal which contributes to food security with an ever-growing demand in Africa. Therefore, production must be continuously increased to meet demand. One way to achieve increased production is to use improved varieties and soil amendments to enhance productivity. However, the usage of these inputs is low in sub-Saharan Africa including Ghana. To contribute to the literature on the economics of applying soil amendments, especially from season to season, on-farm trials were undertaken in the coastal savannah and semi-deciduous forest zones of Ghana to demonstrate profitability of adopting improved maize varieties and soil amendments. Partial budgeting techniques were employed to compute net benefits and marginal rates of return resulting from a shift in strategy from farmer practice to the use of improved maize varieties and soil amendments. Significantly higher yields were obtained with the improved technologies. Maize plants on the sole inorganic fertilizer had significantly (P < 0.05) higher grain yields for all varieties in the two agro-ecological zones in the major season. In the minor season however, grain yields of maize on the combined treatment of inorganic fertilizer + goat manure was significantly (P< 0.05) higher than the rest of the soil amendments for all varieties in both agro-ecological zone. The fertilizer + manure combination yielded the highest net income in both the major and minor seasons. The marginal rates of return for the shift from farmer practice to soil amendments were highest for the fertilizer + manure combination, irrespective of the maize variety and agro-ecological zone. However, the marginal rates of return were minimal for the local maize variety (landrace). In the minor rainy season, net benefit was greater with soil amendment application than with reliance on residual nutrients from the previous season. Thus, residual soil amendment effects alone cannot sustain maize yields and profitability- soil amendments need to be applied continuously.

Suggested Citation

  • Esther, Marfo-Ahenkora & Godwin Y., Ameleke & Kingsley J., Taah & Elvis, Asare-Bediako & Charles Y.F., Domozoro, 2025. "Economic Effects of Using Improved Maize Varieties, Inorganic Fertilizer and Goat Manure in Smallholder Farms: Evidence from Field Evaluations in Southern Ghana," Research on World Agricultural Economy, Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte Ltd (NASS), vol. 6(1), March.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:reowae:401189
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.401189
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/401189/files/6763c6f9db92d.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.401189?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Veronique Theriault & Melinda Smale & Hamza Haider, 2018. "Economic incentives to use fertilizer on maize under differing agro-ecological conditions in Burkina Faso," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 10(5), pages 1263-1277, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Agada, Blessing, "undated". "Changing the fertilizer conversation in Nigeria: The Need for Site Specific Soil-Crop Fertilizer Use," Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Food Security Policy Research Briefs 279873, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Food Security (FSP).
    2. Théodore Nikiema & Eugène C. Ezin & Sylvain Kpenavoun Chogou, 2023. "Bibliometric Analysis of the State of Research on Agroecology Adoption and Methods Used for Its Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Odhiambo Alphonce Kasera & Phennie Morghan Osure & Bruno Charles Oloo & Owili Mathews Odhiambo & Francis Odhiambo Salu & Hemolike Omondi Oguna, 2024. "Disambiguating Maize Policy Failure in Kenya, 2013 – 2024: A Political Economy Perspective," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(7), pages 2581-2601, July.
    4. Ragasa, Catherine & Takeshima, Hiroyuki & Asante, Seth & Amare, Mulubrhan & Ma, Ning & Olanrewaju, Opeyemi & Duchoslav, Jan, 2025. "Maize yield responsiveness and profitability of fertilizer: New survey evidence from six African countries," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    5. Bazona Bapio Lwungili & Justin Bationo, 2025. "Education, technology adoption, and maize productivity in Burkina faso: evidence from an endogenous switching regression," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 5(12), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Jha, P.K. & Araya, A. & Stewart, Z.P. & Faye, A. & Traore, H. & Middendorf, B.J. & Prasad, P.V.V., 2021. "Projecting potential impact of COVID-19 on major cereal crops in Senegal and Burkina Faso using crop simulation models," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    7. William J. Burke & Sieglinde S. Snapp & Thom S. Jayne, 2020. "An in‐depth examination of maize yield response to fertilizer in Central Malawi reveals low profits and too many weeds," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 51(6), pages 923-940, November.
    8. Ayala Wineman & C. Leigh Anderson & Travis W. Reynolds & Pierre Biscaye, 2019. "Methods of crop yield measurement on multi-cropped plots: Examples from Tanzania," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 11(6), pages 1257-1273, December.
    9. Oyakhilomen Oyinbo & Jordan Chamberlin & Tahirou Abdoulaye & Miet Maertens, 2022. "Digital extension, price risk, and farm performance: experimental evidence from Nigeria," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(2), pages 831-852, March.
    10. Kenneth W. Sibiko & Matin Qaim, 2020. "Weather index insurance, agricultural input use, and crop productivity in Kenya," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 12(1), pages 151-167, February.
    11. Melinda Smale & Veronique Thériault & Nicole M. Mason, 2020. "Does subsidizing fertilizer contribute to the diet quality of farm women? Evidence from rural Mali," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 12(6), pages 1407-1424, December.
    12. Stasiv, Oleh & Kachmar, Oksana & Vavrynovych, Oksana & Arabska, Ekaterina, . "Ecological and economic efficiency of growing maize for grain in short-rotation cultivation of the Western region," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 7(2).
    13. World Bank, 2021. "Strengthening the Link between Economic Growth and Poverty Reduction in Mali," World Bank Publications - Reports 36587, The World Bank Group.
    14. Theriault, Veronique & Smale, Melinda, 2021. "The unintended consequences of the fertilizer subsidy program on crop species diversity in Mali," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    15. Jafar Nabati & Ahmad Nezami & Ehsan Neamatollahi & Morteza Akbari, 2023. "An integrated approach land suitability for agroecological zoning based on fuzzy inference system and GIS," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 2316-2338, March.
    16. Kwon, Daye & Myers, Robert J. & Mason, Nicole M., 2022. "How do input subsidy programs affect smallholder households’ dietary diversity? Evidence from Zambia," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322493, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    17. Maertens, Miet & Oyinbo, Oyakhilomen & Abdoulaye, Tahirou & Chamberlin, Jordan, 2023. "Sustainable maize intensification through site-specific nutrient management advice: Experimental evidence from Nigeria," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    18. Jindo, Keiji & Schut, Antonius G.T. & Langeveld, Johannes W.A., 2020. "Sustainable intensification in Western Kenya: Who will benefit?," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    19. Jagustović, Renata & Papachristos, George & Zougmoré, Robert B. & Kotir, Julius H. & Kessler, Aad & Ouédraogo, Mathieu & Ritsema, Coen J. & Dittmer, Kyle M., 2021. "Better before worse trajectories in food systems? An investigation of synergies and trade-offs through climate-smart agriculture and system dynamics," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    20. Oyakhilomen Oyinbo & Jordan Chamberlin & Miet Maertens, 2020. "Design of Digital Agricultural Extension Tools: Perspectives from Extension Agents in Nigeria," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(3), pages 798-815, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:reowae:401189. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nassg.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.