IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/paaero/401330.html

Regionalne Zróżnicowanie Wdrażania Programu Rolnośrodowiskowego W Polsce W Latach 2008-2014

Author

Listed:
  • POMIANEK, BOGDAN
  • MATYKA, MARIUSZ

Abstract

Zarówno rolnicza przestrzeń produkcyjna, jak i produkcja rolnicza w Polsce charakteryzują się znacznym zróżnicowaniem. Za kluczowe elementy polityczne kształtujące rolnictwo należy uznać instrumenty wspólnej polityki rolnej (WPR). Celem badań była ocena zróżnicowania przestrzennego wdrażania programu rolnośrodowiskowego (PRŚ) w okresie programowania 2007-2013, który był realizowany w Polsce w latach 2008-2014. Badaniami objęto 130 618 gospodarstw rolnych wdrażających PRŚ. Analizy przestrzenne wykonano na poziomie powiatów ziemskich (314 jednostek). Dane dotyczące PRŚ pochodziły z Ministerstwa Rolnictwa i Rozwoju Wsi (MRiRW) – instytucji zarządzającej PROW 2007-2013. Ponadto wykorzystano dane GUS. Badane gospodarstwa różniły się pod względem uwarunkowań przyrodniczych i organizacyjno-produkcyjnych oraz powierzchni realizowanych zobowiązań PRŚ. Potwierdzeniem tego było wydzielenie 3 grup skupień dla analizowanych powiatów. Pierwsze skupienie obejmowało powiaty zlokalizowane w większości w północnych i zachodnich województwach Polski. Drugie skupienie składało się głównie z powiatów Polski centralnej, wschodniej i częściowo południowej. Natomiast w trzecim skupieniu znalazły się przede wszystkim powiaty zlokalizowane w południowowschodniej części kraju.

Suggested Citation

  • Pomianek, Bogdan & Matyka, Mariusz, 2025. "Regionalne Zróżnicowanie Wdrażania Programu Rolnośrodowiskowego W Polsce W Latach 2008-2014," Roczniki (Annals), Polish Association of Agricultural Economists and Agribusiness - Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistow Rolnictwa e Agrobiznesu (SERiA), vol. 2025(4).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:paaero:401330
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.401330
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/401330/files/10%20%284%29.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.401330?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen Hynes & Eoghan Garvey, 2009. "Modelling Farmers’ Participation in an Agri‐environmental Scheme using Panel Data: An Application to the Rural Environment Protection Scheme in Ireland," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(3), pages 546-562, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martina Bozzola & Robert Finger, 2021. "Stability of risk attitude, agricultural policies and production shocks: evidence from Italy," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 48(3), pages 477-501.
    2. Cathal O'Donoghue & Thia Hennessy, 2015. "Policy and Economic Change in the Agri-Food Sector in Ireland," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 46(2), pages 315-337.
    3. Ryan, Mary & O’Donoghue, Cathal & Upton, Vincent, 2014. "Land Use Change From Agriculture To Forestry: A Structural Model Of The Income And Leisure Choices Of Farmers," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182753, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Anastasio J. Villanueva & Klaus Glenk & Macario Rodríguez-Entrena, 2017. "Protest Responses and Willingness to Accept: Ecosystem Services Providers’ Preferences towards Incentive-Based Schemes," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(3), pages 801-821, September.
    5. Wunder, Sven & Fraccaroli, Cecilia & Varela, Elsa & Bruzzese, Stefano & Termansen, Mette, 2025. "Examining innovative designs of agri-environmental schemes in Europe: A case comparison of impact pathways," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    6. Ioannis Skevas, 2019. "A Hierarchical Stochastic Frontier Model for Efficiency Measurement Under Technology Heterogeneity," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 17(3), pages 513-524, September.
    7. Cullen, Paula & Ryan, Mary & O'Donoghue, Cathal & Kilgariff, Paul, "undated". "The Economics of Agri-Environment Scheme Design: An Irish Case Study," 92nd Annual Conference, April 16-18, 2018, Warwick University, Coventry, UK 273499, Agricultural Economics Society.
    8. Cullen, Paula & O’Donoghue, Cathal & Ryan, Mary & Kilgarriff, Paul & Hynes, Stephen, "undated". "The Economics of Agri-environment Scheme Design," 166th Seminar, August 30-31, 2018, Galway, West of Ireland 276201, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Doris Läpple, 2010. "Adoption and Abandonment of Organic Farming: An Empirical Investigation of the Irish Drystock Sector," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(3), pages 697-714, September.
    10. Peter Howley & Stephen Hynes & Cathal O'Donoghue, 2012. "Explaining the non-economic behaviour of farm foresters: The effect of productivist and lifestyle motivations," Working Papers 1203, Rural Economy and Development Programme,Teagasc.
    11. Zabala, Aiora & Barrios, Luis Enrique García & Pascual, Unai, 2022. "From participation to commitment in silvopastoral programmes: Insights from Chiapas, Mexico," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    12. Santos, Rui & Clemente, Pedro & Brouwer, Roy & Antunes, Paula & Pinto, Rute, 2015. "Landowner preferences for agri-environmental agreements to conserve the montado ecosystem in Portugal," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 159-167.
    13. Ioanna Grammatikopoulou & Eija Pouta & Sami Myyrä, 2016. "Exploring the determinants for adopting water conservation measures. What is the tendency of landowners when the resource is already at risk?," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(6), pages 993-1014, June.
    14. Xavier Vollenweider & Salvatore Di Falco & Cathal O�Donoghue, 2011. "Risk preferences and voluntary agrienvironmental schemes: does risk aversion explain the uptake of the Rural Environment Protection Scheme?," GRI Working Papers 48, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
    15. Mirosław Biczkowski & Roman Rudnicki & Justyna Chodkowska-Miszczuk & Łukasz Wiśniewski & Mariusz Kistowski & Paweł Wiśniewski, 2023. "Neo-colonialism in the Polish rural world: CAP approach and the phenomenon of suitcase farmers," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(2), pages 667-691, June.
    16. Sergei Schaub & Jaboury Ghazoul & Robert Huber & Wei Zhang & Adelaide Sander & Charles Rees & Simanti Banerjee & Robert Finger, 2023. "The role of behavioural factors and opportunity costs in farmers' participation in voluntary agri‐environmental schemes: A systematic review," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(3), pages 617-660, September.
    17. Kosenius, Anna-Kaisa & Ollikainen, Markku, 2019. "Drivers of Participation in Gypsum Treatment of Fields as an Innovation for Water Protection," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 382-393.
    18. Sauer, Johannes & Walsh, John, 2011. "ESS versus NVZ – The Cost-Effectiveness of Command-and-Control versus Agreement Based Policy Instruments," 85th Annual Conference, April 18-20, 2011, Warwick University, Coventry, UK 108963, Agricultural Economics Society.
    19. Choi, Pak-Sing & Espínola-Arredondo, Ana & Muñoz-García, Félix, 2018. "Conservation procurement auctions with bidirectional externalities," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 559-579.
    20. Roman Rudnicki & Łukasz Wiśniewski & Mirosław Biczkowski, 2021. "A Spatial Typography of Environmentally Friendly Common Agricultural Policy Support Relevant to European Green Deal Objectives," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-19, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:paaero:401330. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/seriaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.