IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ngnjrs/348470.html

Attitude of rural households to community development projects in Ogun state, Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Aromolaran, A. K.
  • Alarima, C. I.
  • Abiona, B. G.
  • Adekola, O. A.
  • Amole, A. B.

Abstract

This study examined the attitude of rural households to Community Development Projects in Ogun state Nigeria. Multi-stage sampling procedure was used to select 120 rural household heads. Data were collected with an interview schedule and analyzed using frequency counts, percentages, mean and correlation. Results reveal that 55.8% of the respondents were male, 53.3% had secondary education and the mean age was 38 years with an average household size of 6 persons. Findings also reveal that the implemented Community Development Projects (CDPs) indicated by more than 60% of the households included borehole, installation of a transformer, security post and entrance gate. Most (64.0%) of them had an undesirable attitude to the CDPs. The strategies used to accomplish these CDPs with the mean score above 2.0 were clear goal setting, delegation and participatory evaluation. The main problems encountered in CDPs were the unwillingness of members to contribute financially (86.7%), lack of cooperation (80.8%) and distrust among members (75.0%). There was a significant relationship between strategies used (r= 0.85, p<0.05) and attitude to CDPs. It was concluded that many of the rural households had undesirable attitude towards CDPs and it is significantly related to strategies used in the project handling and implementation. Therefore, it is recommended that factors which predispose people to undesirable attitude towards CDPs should be resolved at the community level to win peoples? trust and cooperation so as to improve their attitude in projects that can transform their rural communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Aromolaran, A. K. & Alarima, C. I. & Abiona, B. G. & Adekola, O. A. & Amole, A. B., 2020. "Attitude of rural households to community development projects in Ogun state, Nigeria," Nigerian Journal of Rural Sociology, Rural Sociological Association of Nigeria, vol. 18(2), September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ngnjrs:348470
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.348470
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/348470/files/Aromolaran.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.348470?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alan Thomas, 2000. "Development as practice in a liberal capitalist world," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 12(6), pages 773-787.
    2. Ghemawat, Pankaj, 2002. "Competition and Business Strategy in Historical Perspective," Business History Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 76(1), pages 37-74, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. André de Waal, 2011. "Strategy Only Matters A Bit: The role of Strategy in the High Performance Organization," Working Papers 2011/02, Maastricht School of Management.
    2. Gino Cattani & Daniel Sands & Joe Porac & Jason Greenberg, 2018. "Competitive Sensemaking in Value Creation and Capture," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(4), pages 632-657, December.
    3. Juan Alcácer & Wilbur Chung & Ashton Hawk & Gonçalo Pacheco-de-Almeida, 2018. "Applying Random Coefficient Models to Strategy Research: Identifying and Exploring Firm Heterogeneous Effects," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(3), pages 533-553, September.
    4. Fenella Porter, 2012. "Negotiating gender equality in development organizations:The role of agency in the institutionalization of new norms and practices," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 12(4), pages 301-314, October.
    5. Delphine Irac, 2006. "Revisiting the proximity-concentration trade-off: Distance and Horizontal Foreign Direct Investment in OECD countries," Working papers 153, Banque de France.
    6. Giovanni. Gavetti & Daniel A. Levinthal, 2004. "50th Anniversay Article: The Strategy Field from the Perspective of Management Science: Divergent Strands and Possible Integration," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(10), pages 1309-1318, October.
    7. Arup Barua & Alexandra Ioanid, 2021. "Synergistic Competitive Advantage - The Modern Appeal of RBV and IO Theory in the Mergers and Acquisitions," Bulgarian Economic Papers bep-2021-06, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Sofia University St Kliment Ohridski - Bulgaria // Center for Economic Theories and Policies at Sofia University St Kliment Ohridski, revised Jul 2021.
    8. Paul Knott & Chatchai Thnarudee, 2022. "Strategic planning as inter-unit coordination: An in depth case study in Thailand," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 201-224, March.
    9. Chao-Chien Chen & Hsiu-Ping Yueh & Chaoyun Liang, 2016. "Strategic Management of Agribusiness: Determinants and Trends," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 12(4), pages 69-97.
    10. Duane Ireland, R. & Webb, Justin W., 2007. "Strategic entrepreneurship: Creating competitive advantage through streams of innovation," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 49-59.
    11. Thomas Dilger & Sabine Graschitz, 2015. "Influencing Factors on Earnings Management, Empirical Evidence from Listed German and Austrian Companies," International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research (IJBESAR), Democritus University of Thrace (DUTH), Kavala Campus, Greece, vol. 8(2), pages 69-86, October.
    12. Marco Aurélio Lima de Queiroz & Flávio Carvalho de Vasconcelos & Rafael Guilherme Burstein Goldszmidt, 2007. "Economic rents and legitimacy: incorporating elements of organizational analysis institutional theory to the field of business strategy," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 11(spe1), pages 177-198.
    13. Mohammad Muaz Jalil, 2023. "State versus Market Debate and Shaping of the Gender Empowerment Agenda," Review of Development and Change, , vol. 28(1), pages 45-66, June.
    14. Robert W. Fogel, 2008. "The Impact of the Asian Miracle on the Theory of Economic Growth," NBER Chapters, in: Understanding Long-Run Economic Growth: Geography, Institutions, and the Knowledge Economy, pages 311-354, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Ali Nazaritehrani & Behzad Mashali, 2020. "Development of E-banking channels and market share in developing countries," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 1-19, December.
    16. Sorin-George Toma & Stefan-Alexandru Catana & Catalin Gradinaru, 2022. "Competitive Business Strategies In Global Retailing: The Case Of Wal-Mart," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1, pages 106-112, February.
    17. Mai, Nhat Chi, 2022. "Strategic Management," OSF Preprints vauxf, Center for Open Science.
    18. Takahashi, Adriana Roseli Wünsch & Bulgacov, Sergio & Bitencourt, Claudia Cristina & Kaynak, Hale, 2017. "Expandindo a visão de capacidades dinâmicas: Contribuições especiais," RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil), vol. 57(3), May.
    19. A. Arrighetti & R. Brancati & A. Lasagni & A. Maresca, 2015. "Firms’ heterogeneity and performance in manufacturing during the great recession," Economics Department Working Papers 2015-EP03, Department of Economics, Parma University (Italy).
    20. Dina Abbott & Suzanne Brown & Gordon Wilson, 2007. "Development management as reflective practice," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(2), pages 187-203.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ngnjrs:348470. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rusanea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.