IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/joafsc/362830.html

Using TAPE to assess agroecology on women-led farms in the U.S.: Support for environmental and social practices

Author

Listed:
  • Gomori-Ruben, Lianna
  • Reid, Chantal

Abstract

Agriculture models predicated upon producing monocultures for export have proven unsustaina­ble. In response, the Food and Agriculture Organi­za­tion of the United Nations (FAO) has called for nations to produce food agroecologically in align­ment with natural ecosystems. The FAO identified women as critical yet underrepresented leaders in agroecology projects worldwide. Prior research about agroecology and women farmers has primar­ily been situated in low-income nations. This study examines women farming in the United States as a high-income nation to analyze if their practices align with agroecology using the FAO’s 10 Ele­ments of Agroecology and the FAO’s Tool for Agroecology Performance Evaluation (TAPE). A mixed-methods case study design was used to collect web-based survey and interview data from 87 participants. We found that the participating women farmers tended to lead agroecological farming projects that provide direct nutritional, environmental, educational, and social services to their communities in alignment with elements of agroecology. Ninety percent of participants oper­ated farms at 100 acres (405 hectares) or less that mostly used direct sales models (farmers markets, community supported agriculture operations [CSAs], farm stands, and online sales), and half of participants offered opportunities for intergenera­tional engagement. These practices align with the FAO’s elements of Diversity, Co-creation and Sharing of Knowledge, Resilience, Human and Social Values, Culture and Food Traditions, and a Circular and Solidarity Economy. Environmentally, participants emphasized using practices for crop diversity, building soil health, and integrating ani­mals in alignment with the FAO elements of Diversity, Synergies, Recycling, and Resilience. Farm size and region were significant in the preva­lence of agroecological practices. Farms of 50–100 acres (202–405 hectares) were most likely to inte­grate animals, and farms in the Southeast were most likely to identify with conventional agricul­tural practices. Our data show that women-led farms in the U.S. align with sustainable agricultural practices as articulated by the FAO and, as in low-income nations, women play a valuable role in advancing a national agroecological transition.

Suggested Citation

  • Gomori-Ruben, Lianna & Reid, Chantal, 2023. "Using TAPE to assess agroecology on women-led farms in the U.S.: Support for environmental and social practices," Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, Center for Transformative Action, Cornell University, vol. 13(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:joafsc:362830
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/362830/files/1166.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pilgeram, Ryanne & Dentzman, Katherine & Lewin, Paul & Conley, Kelsey, . "How the USDA Changed the Way Women Farmers are Counted in the Census of Agriculture," Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 35(01).
    2. Mary Clare Ahearn & Kathleen Liang & Stephan Goetz, 2018. "Farm business financial performance in local foods value chains," Agricultural Finance Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 78(4), pages 470-488, March.
    3. Tittonell, P. & Fernandez, M. & El Mujtar, V.E. & Preiss, P.V. & Sarapura, S. & Laborda, L. & Mendonça, M.A. & Alvarez, V.E. & Fernandes, G.B. & Petersen, P. & Cardoso, I.M., 2021. "Emerging responses to the COVID-19 crisis from family farming and the agroecology movement in Latin America – A rediscovery of food, farmers and collective action," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Analena Bruce & Elise Neidecker & Luyue Zheng & Isaac Sohn Leslie & Alexa Wilhelm, 2025. "“A farm is viable if it can keep its head above water”: defining and measuring farm viability for small and mid-sized farms," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 42(2), pages 625-641, June.
    2. Mariana Borcoman & Daniela Sorea, 2023. "Ethnic Soups from Rupea Area (Romania) as Resources for Sustainable Local Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-21, January.
    3. Rahe, Mallory L. & Tsay, Juo-Han & Low, Sarah A., 2023. "Vendor persistence and sales growth 2019-2021: Evidence from five rural Oregon farmers markets," 2023 Annual Meeting, July 23-25, Washington D.C. 336002, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. Schmidt, Claudia & Goetz, Stephan J. & Tian, Zheng, 2021. "Female farmers in the United States: Research needs and policy questions," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    5. Sarah Stempfle & Domenico Carlucci & Luigi Roselli & Bernardo Corrado de Gennaro, 2025. "A Conceptual Framework for an Agroecological Business Model Canvas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-27, October.
    6. Chiaverina, Pierre & Drogué, Sophie & Jacquet, Florence, 2024. "Do Farmers Participating in Short Food Supply Chains Use Less Pesticides? Evidence from France," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    7. repec:ags:aaea22:336002 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Baldini, Carolina & Marasas, Mariana Edith & Tittonell, Pablo & Drozd, Andrea Alejandra, 2022. "Urban, periurban and horticultural landscapes – Conflict and sustainable planning in La Plata district, Argentina," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    9. Ana Deaconu & Malek Batal & Claudia Irene Calderón & Patrick Caron & Jessica Mcnally & Emile Frison & Geneviève Mercille & Mylène Riva & Ben Brisbois, 2024. "Food systems innovation to nurture equity and resilience globally (food SINERGY): Insights from the food SINERGY network," Post-Print hal-05182602, HAL.
    10. Enthoven, Laura & Van den Broeck, Goedele, 2021. "Local food systems: Reviewing two decades of research," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    11. Aidha Auliah & Gunawan Prayitno & Ismu Rini Dwi Ari & Rahmawati & Lusyana Eka Wardani & Christia Meidiana, 2022. "The Role of Social Capital Facing Pandemic COVID-19 in Tourism Village to Support Sustainable Agriculture (Empirical Evidence from Two Tourism Villages in Indonesia)," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, December.
    12. Olga A. Chernova & Baraa Ali, 2021. "Cooperative strategies of food enterprises amid the COVID-19 pandemic," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 12(5), pages 70-83, November.
    13. Guillermo Zambrano & Lina M. Tennhardt & Moritz Egger & Karen Ramírez & Adriana Santos & Byron Moyano & Michael Curran, 2024. "Differing impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on farmers and intermediaries: insights into the Ecuadorian cocoa value chain," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, December.
    14. Anika M. Rice, 2025. "Feminist agroecologies in Guatemala during economic shock," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 42(3), pages 2223-2231, September.
    15. Neda Baniasadi & Davoud Samari & Seyyed Jamal Farajollah Hosseini & Maryam Omidi Najafabadi, 2021. "Strategic study of total innovation management and its relationship with marketing capabilities in palm conversion and complementary industries," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.
    16. Bauman, Allison & Jablonski, Becca B. R. & Key, Nigel D. & Hadrich, Joleen C., 2022. "Land tenure and profitability outcomes for U.S. beginning farmers and ranchers," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322233, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    17. Grigorescu, Ines & Popovici, Elena-Ana & Damian, Nicoleta & Dumitraşcu, Monica & Sima, Mihaela & Mitrică, Bianca & Mocanu, Irena, 2022. "The resilience of sub-urban small farming in Bucharest Metropolitan Area in response to the COVID-19 pandemic," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    18. Durant, Jennie L. & Asprooth, Lauren & Galt, Ryan E. & Schmulevich, Sasha Pesci & Manser, Gwyneth M. & Pinzón, Natalia, 2023. "Farm resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic: The case of California direct market farmers," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    19. Carly E. Nichols, 2024. "Being a woman with the “skills of a man”: negotiating gender in the 21st century US Corn Belt," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 41(3), pages 1053-1068, September.
    20. Hartarska, Valentina & Adjei, Eugene & Nadolnyak, Denis, 2024. "The transition incentive program and women farmers in the USA," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    21. Katherine Dentzman & Ryanne Pilgeram & Falin Wilson, 2023. "Applying the feminist agrifood systems theory (fast) to U.S. organic, value-added, and non-organic non-value-added farms," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(3), pages 1185-1204, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:joafsc:362830. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.