IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/joaaec/15138.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conservation Tillage And Pesticide Use In The Cornbelt

Author

Listed:
  • Fuglie, Keith O.

Abstract

Adoption of conservation tillage can lead to substantial environmental benefits from reduced soil erosion. But benefits may be partially offset if adoption increases reliance on agricultural chemicals. Using area study data from the Cornbelt, this study examines factors affecting adoption of no-till and other conservation tillage systems and their effect on chemical use and corn yield. The results find no evidence that herbicide or fertilizer application rates are higher on fields with conservation tillage systems compared with conventional tillage. However, insecticide use may increase somewhat and yield may be lower. Current demographic trends in U.S. agriculture favor continued diffusion of conservation tillage.

Suggested Citation

  • Fuglie, Keith O., 1999. "Conservation Tillage And Pesticide Use In The Cornbelt," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 31(01), pages 1-15, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:joaaec:15138
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.15138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/15138/files/31010133.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.15138?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Parveen Setia & Steven Piper, 1992. "Effects of Soil and Agricultural Chemicals Management on Farm Returns and Ground Water Quality," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 14(1), pages 65-80.
    2. Linda K. Lee & William H. Stewart, 1983. "Landownership and the Adoption of Minimum Tillage," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 65(2), pages 256-264.
    3. Alt, Klaus Friedrich, 1976. "An economic analysis of field crop production, insecticide use and soil erosion in a subbasin of the Iowa River," ISU General Staff Papers 197601010800006672, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    4. Hausman, Jerry & McFadden, Daniel, 1984. "Specification Tests for the Multinomial Logit Model," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 52(5), pages 1219-1240, September.
    5. Michael R. Rahm & Wallace E. Huffman, 1984. "The Adoption of Reduced Tillage: The Role of Human Capital and Other Variables," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 66(4), pages 405-413.
    6. Hoppe, Robert A., 1996. "Who Are Retired Farm Operators?," Agricultural Economic Reports 262032, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    7. Ralph E. Heimlich, 1985. "Landownership and the Adoption of Minimum Tillage: Comment," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 67(3), pages 679-681.
    8. E. Douglas Beach & Gerald A. Carlson, 1993. "A Hedonic Analysis of Herbicides: Do User Safety and Water Quality Matter?," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 75(3), pages 612-623.
    9. McFadden, Daniel, 1974. "The measurement of urban travel demand," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 303-328, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nadella, Karthik & Deaton, Brady & Lawley, Chad & Weersink, Alfons, 2014. "Do farmers treat rented land differently than the land they own? A fixed effects model of farmer’s decision to adopt conservation practices on owned and rented land," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 170633, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Madhu Khanna, 2001. "Sequential Adoption of Site-Specific Technologies and its Implications for Nitrogen Productivity: A Double Selectivity Model," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 83(1), pages 35-51.
    3. Vidale, E & Pettenella, D & Gatto, P & Secco, L, 23. "What can we sell behind timber production?," Scandinavian Forest Economics: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Scandinavian Society of Forest Economics, Scandinavian Society of Forest Economics, issue 44, May.
    4. B. James Deaton & Chad Lawley & Karthik Nadella, 2018. "Renters, landlords, and farmland stewardship," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 49(4), pages 521-531, July.
    5. Chidlow, Agnieszka & Holmström-Lind, Christine & Holm, Ulf & Tallman, Steve, 2015. "Do I stay or do I go? Sub-national drivers for post-entry subsidiary development," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 266-275.
    6. Sydorovych, Olha & Marra, Michele C., 2005. "Towards a Generalizable Measure of the Value of a Change in Pesticide Use," 2005 Annual Meeting, February 5-9, 2005, Little Rock, Arkansas 35513, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    7. Grogger, Jeffrey & Hanson, Gordon H., 2011. "Income maximization and the selection and sorting of international migrants," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 42-57, May.
    8. Rahul Kapoor & Nathan R. Furr, 2015. "Complementarities and competition: Unpacking the drivers of entrants' technology choices in the solar photovoltaic industry," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 416-436, March.
    9. Boris Bravo & Horacio Cocchi & Daniel Solís, 2006. "Adoption of Soil Conservation Technologies in El Salvador: A cross-Section and Over-Time Analysis," OVE Working Papers 1806, Inter-American Development Bank, Office of Evaluation and Oversight (OVE).
    10. Abdulla, Majd, 2009. "The impact of ownership on Iowa land owners' decisions to adopt conservation practices," ISU General Staff Papers 200901010800001913, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    11. Bergantino, Angela Stefania & Madio, Leonardo, 2017. "High-speed rail, inter-modal substitution and willingness-to-pay. A stated preference analysis for the ‘Bari-Rome’," Working Papers 17_6, SIET Società Italiana di Economia dei Trasporti e della Logistica.
    12. Zepeda, Lydia, 1990. "Adoption of Capital Versus Management Intensive Technologies," Staff Papers 200528, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    13. Yu Li & Yan A. Zhang & Wei Shi, 2020. "Navigating geographic and cultural distances in international expansion: The paradoxical roles of firm size, age, and ownership," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(5), pages 921-949, May.
    14. Bergantino, Angela Stefania & Capurso, Mauro & Hess, Stephane, 2017. "Modelling regional accessibility towards airports using discrete choice models: an application to the Apulian airport system," Working Papers 17_4, SIET Società Italiana di Economia dei Trasporti e della Logistica.
    15. Djido, Abdoulaye Ibrahim & Vitale, Jeffrey D. & Epplin, Francis M., 2009. "Conventional Tillage versus No-till: Characteristics of Producers and Farms," 2009 Annual Meeting, January 31-February 3, 2009, Atlanta, Georgia 46717, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    16. Haghani, Milad & Bliemer, Michiel C.J. & Hensher, David A., 2021. "The landscape of econometric discrete choice modelling research," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    17. Sawadgo, Wendiam & Zhang, Wendong & Plastina, Alejandro, 2019. "What drives landowners’ conservation decisions? Evidence from Iowa," ISU General Staff Papers 201905230700001082, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    18. Mackenzie, Lesego & Mburu, John & Irungu, Patrick, 2017. "Analysis Of Household Choice And Determinants Of Livelihood Diversification Activities In Chobe District, Botswana," Dissertations and Theses 269268, University of Nairobi, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    19. Samir Ghazouani & Mohamed Goaïed, 1993. "Analyse micro-économétrique de la demande de transport urbain pour la ville de Tunis," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 108(2), pages 47-62.
    20. Martínez-Espiñeira, Roberto & García-Valiñas, María Á. & Matesanz, David, 2019. "Public Attitudes towards Hydraulic Fracturing in Western Newfoundland," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Crop Production/Industries;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:joaaec:15138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/saeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.