IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ersfer/355002.html

Coordination des acteurs dans deux filières aoc Une approche par la théorie des coûts de transaction

Author

Listed:
  • Barjolle, Dominique
  • Chappuis, Jean-Marc

Abstract

Regional supply chains of quality products (PDO for example) build up their strategy on differentiation. The analysis by means of Transaction Cost Theory (Williamson, 1975, 1985) of two supply chains of Protected Designation of Origin allows us to identify the advantages and the disadvantages of organization forms for the transactions from milk producers to retailers. It was not possible to calculate the economies of costs linked to the observed governance mode. This is one of the classical criticisms of this approach. Nevertheless, the analysis remains interesting for us because it highlights the various mechanisms of the transactions at the different levels of the supply chain. We stress that the microeconomic character of the approach is a limit to the analysis. Mesoeconomic elements such as cultural bonds between the actors or macroecomomic elements such as market power of large retailers must be considered if we want to explain the encountered governance structures.

Suggested Citation

  • Barjolle, Dominique & Chappuis, Jean-Marc, 2000. "Coordination des acteurs dans deux filières aoc Une approche par la théorie des coûts de transaction," Économie rurale, French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale), vol. 258.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ersfer:355002
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.355002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/355002/files/ecoru_0013-0559_2000_num_258_1_5196.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.355002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Williamson, Oliver E, 1993. "Calculativeness, Trust, and Economic Organization," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 36(1), pages 453-486, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Prince Hikouatcha & Alain Gilles Tagne Foka & Armand Depesquidoux Fossi & Simplice A Asongu, 2024. "Empirical investigation of the Fintech and financial literacy nexus: Small business managers’ insights in Cameroon," African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 219-237, February.
    2. Francisco Brahm & Jorge Tarzijan, 2016. "Relational Contracts and Collaboration in the Supply Chain: Impact of Expected Future Business Volume on the Make-or-Buy Decision," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 52(3), pages 48-67, July.
    3. Marc A. Cohen, 2014. "Genuine, non-calculative trust with calculative antecedents: Reconsidering Williamson on trust," Journal of Trust Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 44-56, April.
    4. Lucio Biggiero & Enrico Sevi, 2009. "Opportunism by cheating and its effects on industry profitability. The CIOPS model," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 191-236, September.
    5. Anne Corcos & Yorgos Rizopoulos, 2011. "Is prosocial behavior egocentric? The “invisible hand” of emotions," Post-Print halshs-01968213, HAL.
    6. Damien Bo, 2009. "Inter-Organizational Controls in Public Land Concession Contracts," Working Papers hal-00462488, HAL.
    7. Christophe Charlier, 2012. "Distrust and Barriers to International Trade in Food Products: An Analysis of the US — Poultry Dispute," GREDEG Working Papers 2012-02, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France, revised Nov 2013.
    8. Hartmann, Frank & Slapnicar, Sergeja, 2009. "How formal performance evaluation affects trust between superior and subordinate managers," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(6-7), pages 722-737, August.
    9. Griessmair, Michele & Hussain, Dildar & Windsperger, Josef, 2014. "Trust and the tendency towards multi-unit franchising: A relational governance view," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(11), pages 2337-2345.
    10. Bennett Robert J., 2016. "Management adaptation of business association services: long-term stability 1783-2012 and ‘change points’ for Irish chambers of commerce," The Irish Journal of Management, Sciendo, vol. 35(1), pages 58-73, April.
    11. Diego Prior & Jordi Surroca & Josep A. Tribó, 2008. "Are Socially Responsible Managers Really Ethical? Exploring the Relationship Between Earnings Management and Corporate Social Responsibility," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(3), pages 160-177, May.
    12. Sanjay Goel & Ranjan Karri, 2006. "Entrepreneurs, Effectual Logic, and Over–Trust," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 30(4), pages 477-493, July.
    13. Shi, Wei & Tang, Yinuo, 2015. "Cultural similarity as in-group favoritism: The impact of religious and ethnic similarities on alliance formation and announcement returns," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 32-46.
    14. Jonathan Labbé, 2017. "Private Equity: Universality of financing and universality of effects on business innovation? A conceptual approach [Capital-investissement : Universalité du financement et universalité des effets sur l’innovation des entreprises ? Une approche co," Post-Print hal-03000109, HAL.
    15. Jens Hagendorff & Sonya Lim & Duc Duy Nguyen, 2023. "Lender Trust and Bank Loan Contracts," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(3), pages 1758-1779, March.
    16. Martinez, Candace & Cummings, Michael E. & Vaaler, Paul M., 2015. "Economic informality and the venture funding impact of migrant remittances to developing countries11Please contact Paul M. Vaaler regarding this paper. This research benefitted from a presentation at the Instituto de Empresa, Madrid, Spain, Simon Fra," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 526-545.
    17. Dobos, Imre & Gelei, Andrea, 2016. "Bizalom az üzleti kapcsolatokban. A diadikus adatelemzés egy alkalmazása [Trust in business relations - an application of dyadic data analysis]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(3), pages 330-349.
    18. Robbert Maseland & Douglas Dow & Piers Steel, 2018. "The Kogut and Singh national cultural distance index: Time to start using it as a springboard rather than a crutch," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 49(9), pages 1154-1166, December.
    19. Seung-Hyun Lee & Hee Jin Mun & Kyung Min Park, 2015. "When is dependence on other organizations burdensome? The effect of asymmetric dependence on internet firm failure," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(13), pages 2058-2074, December.
    20. Zhou, Liying & Mao, Hongyi & Zhao, Taiyang & Wang, Valerie Lynette & Wang, Xiaodong & Zuo, Peng, 2022. "How B2B platform improves Buyers’ performance: Insights into platform’s substitution effect," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 72-80.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ersfer:355002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sferrea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.