IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ersfer/354625.html

Etre et avoir. Patrimoine versus capital : le cas de l'agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Barthelemy, Denis

Abstract

The legal organization of the farm may be viewed as the relative movement of two institutions: the firm (ensuring the growth of a capital) and the family (presiding over a patrimony designed to secure its long-term survival). An analysis of the farm lease legal regulations, of the policy with regard to farm structure and farm entry, and of the operating principles of the CAP, reveals the emergence of a capital rationality in contrast to the pre-existing patrimonial logic, accompanied by the submission of the firm to a patrimonial finality. This research brings out the lack of consistency characterizing the concept of patrimony in economic analysis, echoing its individualizing reduction at the level of legal concept.

Suggested Citation

  • Barthelemy, Denis, 2000. "Etre et avoir. Patrimoine versus capital : le cas de l'agriculture," Économie rurale, French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale), vol. 260.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ersfer:354625
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.354625
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/354625/files/ecoru_0013-0559_2000_num_260_1_1108.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.354625?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Geoffrey M. Hodgson, 1998. "The Approach of Institutional Economics," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 36(1), pages 166-192, March.
    2. Barthez, Alice, 1999. "Installation « hors du cadre familial » et relation d'adoption," Économie rurale, French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale), vol. 253.
    3. Alchian, Armen A. & Demsetz, Harold, 1973. "The Property Right Paradigm," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 33(1), pages 16-27, March.
    4. Kelvin J. Lancaster, 1966. "A New Approach to Consumer Theory," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 74(2), pages 132-132.
    5. Alice Barthez, 1999. "Installation « hors du cadre familial » et relation d'adoption," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 253(1), pages 15-20.
    6. André Masson, 1999. "Quelle solidarité intergénérationnelle ?," Revue Française d'Économie, Programme National Persée, vol. 14(1), pages 27-90.
    7. Neil Bruce & Michael Waldman, 1990. "The Rotten-Kid Theorem Meets the Samaritan's Dilemma," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 105(1), pages 155-165.
    8. Commons, John R., 1931. "Institutional Economics," History of Economic Thought Articles, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, vol. 21, pages 648-657.
    9. Bergstrom, Theodore C, 1989. "A Fresh Look at the Rotten Kid Theorem--and Other Household Mysteries," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 97(5), pages 1138-1159, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barthélemy, Denis, 2000. "Être et avoir. Patrimoine versus capital : le cas de l'agriculture," Économie rurale, French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale), vol. 260.
    2. Robert Pollak, 2003. "Gary Becker's Contributions to Family and Household Economics," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 111-141, January.
    3. Timothy Goodspeed & Andrew Haughwout, 2012. "On the optimal design of disaster insurance in a federation," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-27, March.
    4. André Masson & Anne Gotman, 1991. "L'un transmet, l'autre hérite..," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 100(4), pages 207-230.
    5. Charlene Kalenkoski, 2008. "Parent-child bargaining, parental transfers, and the post-secondary education decision," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(4), pages 413-436.
    6. Johan Lagerl–f, 2004. "Efficiency-enhancing signalling in the Samaritan's dilemma," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 114(492), pages 55-69, January.
    7. Amihai Glazer & Hiroki Kondo, 2010. "Governmental Transfers Can Reduce a Moral Hazard Problem," Working Papers 101102, University of California-Irvine, Department of Economics.
    8. Meta Brown & John Karl Scholz & Ananth Seshadri, 2012. "A New Test of Borrowing Constraints for Education," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 79(2), pages 511-538.
    9. Agee, Mark D. & Crocker, Thomas D., 2002. "On Techniques to Value the Impact of Environmental Hazards on Children's Health," National Center for Environmental Economics-NCEE Working Papers 280801, United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    10. Cigno, A., 2016. "Conflict and Cooperation Within the Family, and Between the State and the Family, in the Provision of Old-Age Security," Handbook of the Economics of Population Aging, in: Piggott, John & Woodland, Alan (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Population Aging, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 609-660, Elsevier.
    11. Shim, Ilhyock & Sharma, Sunil & Chami, Ralph, 2008. "A Model of the IMF as a Coinsurance Arrangement," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 2, pages 1-41.
    12. Man Si, 2015. "Intrafamily bargaining and love," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 771-789, December.
    13. Thomas Seegmuller, 2003. "Altruistics bequests and non-negative savings," Recherches économiques de Louvain, De Boeck Université, vol. 69(4), pages 349-369.
    14. Stefano Dughera & Alain Marciano, 2022. "Altruism and Strategic Courage. Inside Buchanan's Samaritan's Dilemma," Working Papers hal-03684249, HAL.
    15. Blanc, Michel & Perrier-Cornet, Philippe, 1999. "Emploi agricole : les cadres d'analyse à l'épreuve des dynamiques actuelles," Économie rurale, French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale), vol. 253.
    16. Russell Cooper & Hubert Kempf & Dan Peled, 2004. "Is it is or is it Ain't my Obligation? Regional Debt in Monetary Unions," NBER Working Papers 10239, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    17. Jere R. Behrman, 1994. "Intra-family Distribution in Developing Countries," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 33(3), pages 253-296.
    18. Yang‐Ming Chang & Dennis L. Weisman, 2005. "Sibling Rivalry and Strategic Parental Transfers," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 71(4), pages 821-836, April.
    19. Shelly Lundberg & Jennifer Romich & Kwok Tsang, 2009. "Decision-making by children," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-30, March.
    20. Lingxin Hao & V. Joseph Hotz & Ginger Zhe Jin, 2000. "Games Daughters and Parents Play: Teenage Childbearing, Parental Reputation, and Strategic Transfers," NBER Working Papers 7670, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ersfer:354625. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sferrea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.