IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/404283.html

Niche grain production as a diversification strategy for sustainability and risk resilience: evidence from Ukraine

Author

Listed:
  • Vasylieva, Natalia
  • Nazarenko, Dmytro

Abstract

Purpose. Grain crops play a pivotal role in providing global food security. The goal of this study is to assess the diversification level in production of niche grain crops and develop models to clarify its patterns focusing specifically on Ukrainian agriculture as it navigates through the unprecedented crisis caused by the Russian military invasion. Methodology. The methodological framework of the research includes methods of comparative analysis, cluster modelling, and optimisation theory. The examined statistical data for 2019–2025 were retrieved from official websites and reliable online sources. This approach underpins substantiated recommendations on how niche grain production can remain resilient in times of turbulence and shocks. Results. The article findings highlight that, owing to exceptional environmental and economic advantages, the production of buckwheat, millet, oats, and rye complies with the principles of green and circular economies, reducing waste, dependence on chemical inputs, and and requirements for of natural resource quality. Balanced diversification of niche grain crops results in higher adaptability to climatic patterns and pricing uncertainty, as observed in Ukraine during wartime. Optimisation models of regional clusters and scenario analysis suggest workable management approaches to develop sustainable and highly beneficial cultivation strategies. Originality. The novelty of the work lies in the mathematical integration of production indicators (volumes and harvested areas) with market and environmental dynamics (prices and yields), which together uncover untapped potential for fostering diversified cultivation of niche grain crops in unstable natural and market environments. Practical implications. The major practical value of the research outcomes stems from the fact that the development of niche grain crop production can provide nutritious healthy food, enhance biodiversity, improve soil parameters, shorten supply chains, and empower smallholder farmers to remain competitive regardless of risks and external pressure.

Suggested Citation

  • Vasylieva, Natalia & Nazarenko, Dmytro, 2026. "Niche grain production as a diversification strategy for sustainability and risk resilience: evidence from Ukraine," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 12(2), June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:404283
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.404283
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/404283/files/2_Vasylieva_article.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.404283?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. D'Amato, D. & Korhonen, J., 2021. "Integrating the green economy, circular economy and bioeconomy in a strategic sustainability framework," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    2. Moskalenko, Anatolii & Ivanov, Dmytro & Shyian, Nataliia & Khalep, Yurii, 2023. "Environmental features of land use formation in the regions of Ukraine," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 9(4), December.
    3. Ukrit Jaroenkietkajorn & Shabbir H. Gheewala & Rattanawan Mungkung & Napat Jakrawatana & Thapat Silalertruksa & Naruetep Lecksiwilai & Jittima Prasara-A & Pariyapat Nilsalab, 2024. "Challenges and Opportunities of Bio-Circular-Green Economy for Agriculture," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 4(3), pages 1729-1750, September.
    4. Moucheng Liu & Xin Chen & Yuanmei Jiao, 2024. "Sustainable Agriculture: Theories, Methods, Practices and Policies," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-4, March.
    5. repec:ags:areint:342112 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Soriano, Bárbara & Garrido, Alberto & Bertolozzi-Caredio, Daniele & Accatino, Francesco & Antonioli, Federico & Krupin, Vitaliy & Meuwissen, Miranda P.M. & Ollendorf, Franziska & Rommel, Jens & Spiege, 2023. "Actors and their roles for improving resilience of farming systems in Europe," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 98, pages 134-146.
    7. Basso, Bruno & Jones, James W. & Antle, John & Martinez-Feria, Rafael A. & Verma, Brahm, 2021. "Enabling circularity in grain production systems with novel technologies and policy," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Snovia Naseem & Tang Yong & Umair Kashif, 2026. "Using an Empirical Approach to Narrate the Role of Circular Economy in Achieving Sustainable Development Goals (9 and 13)," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(2), pages 2476-2489, April.
    2. Huang, Zhilin & Li, Xiang & Chen, Jialing & Zhang, Dingfeng, 2024. "Does the Three-Year Action Plan for Winning the Blue Sky Defense Battle implementation enabling the high-quality development of regional energy? A quasi-natural experiment from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    3. Simon Mair, 2022. "Writing our way to sustainable economies? How academic sustainability writing engages with capitalism," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(7), pages 1460-1474, October.
    4. Tuğba Yeğin & Muhammad Ikram, 2022. "Performance Evaluation of Green Furniture Brands in the Marketing 4.0 Period: An Integrated MCDM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-32, August.
    5. repec:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:30:p:437-447 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Andressa Porto Castro & Ely José de Mattos, 2025. "Environmental protection versus economic growth: Determinants of individual preference," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(1), pages 87-106, January.
    7. Khai Wah Khaw & Mark Camilleri & Victor Tiberius & Alhamzah Alnoor & Ali Shakir Zaidan, 2024. "Benchmarking electric power companies’ sustainability and circular economy behaviors: using a hybrid PLS-SEM and MCDM approach," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 6561-6599, March.
    8. Arcuri, Maria Cristina & GANDOLFI, GINO & PISANI, RAOUL, 2026. "Italian SMEs and access to credit: Does being “green” matter?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    9. Piotr Misztal & Paweł Dziekański, 2023. "Green Economy and Waste Management as Determinants of Modeling Green Capital of Districts in Poland in 2010–2020," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-25, January.
    10. Dabija Dadiana & Năstase Carmen, 2024. "Exploring the Evolution of Sustainability Paradigms: From Linear to Circular Economy Models," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 754-769.
    11. Abderahman Rejeb & Karim Rejeb & Andrea Appolloni & Horst Treiblmaier & Mohammad Iranmanesh, 2023. "Circular Economy Research in the COVID-19 Era: a Review and the Road Ahead," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(4), pages 2127-2157, December.
    12. C A Zuniga-Gonzalez & J L Quiroga-Canaviri & J J Brambila-Paz & S G Ceballos-Pérez & M M Rojas-Rojas, 2024. "Formulation of an innovative model for the bioeconomy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(11), pages 1-23, November.
    13. Rigen Mo & Xian-hong Peng & Shao-bu Wang & Justin Zuopeng Zhang, 2024. "Knowledge Mapping of Green Economy Research: A Bibliometric Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(4), pages 21582440241, November.
    14. Holz, Jana Rebecca & Saave, Anna, 2025. "Extractivist valorization in industrial forestry in the Global North – Elements of an analytical framework and illustration for the cases of Finland and Alberta, Canada," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    15. Marek Zieliński & Wojciech Józwiak & Agata Żak & Tomasz Rokicki, 2025. "Development of Eco-Schemes as an Important Environmental Measure in Areas Facing Natural or Other Specific Constraints Under the Common Agriculture Policy 2023–2027: Evidence from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-20, March.
    16. Cheng, Huixian & Cai, Hailong & Wang, Xiuqing, 2025. "What is the magnitude of risk exposure in China’s bioeconomic supply chains?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    17. Joanicjusz Nazarko & Ewa Chodakowska & Łukasz Nazarko, 2022. "Evaluating the Transition of the European Union Member States towards a Circular Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-24, May.
    18. Korhonen-Kurki, Kaisa & Horn, Susanna & Entsalo, Hanna & Turunen, Topi & D'Amato, Dalia & Riechers, Maraja & Närhi, Juuli, 2024. "Leverage points for sustainability transformation: Identifying past and future changes in the Finnish (circular) plastic packing system," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    19. Xinwen Lin & V. G. R. Chandran Govindaraju & Yuze He, 2025. "Environmental Regulation and Industrial Ecology Productivity: Evidence From China," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(4), pages 21582440251, October.
    20. Alessandra Piccoli & Federica Viganò, 2025. "Unveiling the Motivations Behind Cultivating Fungus-Resistant Wine Varieties: Insights from Wine Growers in South Tyrol, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-20, March.
    21. Hamid Balali & Gholamreza Eslamifar & Connie M. Maxwell & Alexander Fernald, 2025. "Dynamic Simulation Modeling for Resilience Assessment of Coupled Water–Agriculture–Community Systems in a Semi-Arid Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-22, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:404283. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.