IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/355992.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Livestock production losses in Ukraine: economic damages caused by the war

Author

Listed:
  • Kotykova, Olena
  • Babych, Mykola
  • Pohorielova, Olena
  • Nadvynychnyy, Sergiy

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of this study is to assess the economic losses incurred by Ukraine’s livestock production sector due to the war in 2022. The research focuses on quantifying the scale of food losses and evaluating their economic impact. Methodology. The study uses a comprehensive methodological framework developed by the Kyiv School of Economics (KSE). Economic losses were calculated using both national average and regional pricing approaches. The analysis focuses on losses of cattle, pigs, poultry, and other livestock, as well as milk and eggs. Results. The study found that the largest economic losses in Ukraine’s livestock production sector in 2022 were concentrated in regions directly impacted by military actions, including frontline areas and territories temporarily occupied by the Russian Federation. Donetsk, Kherson, Zaporizhzhia, and Kharkiv regions suffered the greatest losses. Total economic damages from livestock production losses amounted to over 785.6 million euros based on regional prices and 800.9 million euros based on national prices. While regional price variations and productivity differences played a role in the overall economic losses, the primary driver of these losses was the direct impact of the war on livestock farming in affected area. The findings aim to contribute to the broader discussions regarding reparations and post-war agricultural recovery efforts. Originality. This study offers a novel approach by focusing specifically on war-induced food losses in the livestock sector and assessing both direct and indirect economic impacts. The use of both national and regional pricing provides a more accurate estimate of economic losses, highlighting the regional disparities caused by the conflict. The findings contribute new insights into the economic repercussions of war on agricultural productivity and food security. Practical value. The results of this study are important for policymakers and international organisations working in the field of post-war reconstruction and reparations. A quantitative assessment of economic losses can serve as a basis for developing recovery strategies, allocating aid, and prioritising investments in the agricultural sector. Moreover, the research highlights the need for region-specific approaches to effectively address the unique challenges faced by each affected area.

Suggested Citation

  • Kotykova, Olena & Babych, Mykola & Pohorielova, Olena & Nadvynychnyy, Sergiy, 2024. "Livestock production losses in Ukraine: economic damages caused by the war," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 10(4), December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:355992
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.355992
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/355992/files/4_Kotykova_article.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.355992?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Torres-Miralles, M. & Kyttä, V. & Jeanneret, P. & Lamminen, M. & Manzano, P. & Tuomisto, H.L. & Herzon, I., 2024. "Applying life cycle assessment to European high nature value farming systems: Environmental impacts and biodiversity," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    2. Kajsa Resare Sahlin & Line J. Gordon & Regina Lindborg & Johannes Piipponen & Pierre Rysselberge & Julia Rouet-Leduc & Elin Röös, 2024. "Author Correction: An exploration of biodiversity limits to grazing ruminant milk and meat production," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 7(12), pages 1751-1751, December.
    3. Kajsa Resare Sahlin & Line J. Gordon & Regina Lindborg & Johannes Piipponen & Pierre Rysselberge & Julia Rouet-Leduc & Elin Röös, 2024. "An exploration of biodiversity limits to grazing ruminant milk and meat production," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 7(9), pages 1160-1170, September.
    4. Devadoss, Stephen & Ridley, William, 2024. "Impacts of the Russian invasion of Ukraine on the global wheat market," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    5. Alfonso Giuliani & Hervé Baron, 2023. "The CAP (Common Agricultural Policy): A Short History of Crises and Major Transformations of European Agriculture," Post-Print hal-04246646, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Md Tariqul Islam Imran & Chitra Lekha Karmaker & Rubayet Karim & S M Misbauddin & A B M Mainul Bari & Asif Raihan, 2024. "Modeling the supply chain sustainability imperatives in the fashion retail industry: Implications for sustainable development," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(12), pages 1-27, December.
    2. Raphael Calel & David A. Stainforth, 2025. "Little floods everywhere: what will climate change mean for you?," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 178(1), pages 1-9, January.
    3. Rotem Zelingher, 2024. "Democratising Agricultural Commodity Price Forecasting: The AGRICAF Approach," Papers 2410.20363, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2025.
    4. Deininger, Klaus & Ali, Daniel Ayalew & Fang, Ming, 2025. "Impact of the Russian invasion on Ukrainian small and medium farmers’ productivity," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    5. Klaus W. Deininger & Daniel Ayalew Ali, 2024. "Using Satellite Imagery and a Farmer Registry to Assess Agricultural Support in Conflict Settings : The Case of the Producer Support Grant Program in Ukraine," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10912, The World Bank.
    6. Miroslav Drljača & Saša Petar & Grace D. Brannan & Igor Štimac, 2025. "Quality Models for Preventing the Impact of Supply Chain Disruptions in Future Crises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-29, April.
    7. Yilmazkuday, Hakan, 2024. "Geopolitical risk and stock prices," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    8. Raluca Georgiana Robu & Alina Petronela Alexoaei & Valentin Cojanu & Dumitru Miron, 2024. "The cereal network: a baseline approach to current configurations of trade communities," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, December.
    9. Salami, Monsurat Ayojimi & Tanrıvermiş, Harun & Tanrıvermiş, Yesim, 2024. "Influence of Ukraine invasion by Russia on Turkish markets," The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, Elsevier, vol. 29(C).
    10. Klaus W. Deininger & Daniel Ayalew Ali & Kussul,Nataliia & Lemoine,Guido & Shelestov,Andrii, 2024. "Micro-Level Impacts of the War on Ukraine’s Agriculture Sector : Distinguishing Local and National Effects over Time," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10869, The World Bank.
    11. Nepal, Prakash & Lamica, Austin & Parajuli, Rajan, 2024. "Projected effects of the Russian invasion of Ukraine on global forest products markets," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    12. Klaus W. Deininger & Daniel Ayalew Ali, 2024. "Land Price Effects of Informality, Farm Size, and Land Reform : Evidence from More Than One Million Transactions in Ukraine," Policy Research Working Paper Series 11013, The World Bank.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:355992. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.