IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/330344.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutional support for formation of reproductive logistics on the bread and bakery market of Ukraine

Author

Listed:
  • Zerkina, Oksana
  • Nikishyna, Oksana
  • Bondarenko, Svitlana
  • Makovoz, Оksana
  • Durbalova, Natalia

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of the study is to substantiate the impact of institutional transformations on the formation of reproducible logistics of the grain market of Ukraine in terms of spheres of regulated, partially and unregulated trade, their interactions and connections, as well as the development of a mechanism for institutional support of reproducible market logistics, taking into account European experience. Methodology / approach. During the research, general scientific and special research methods were used, namely: monographic (when studying the theoretical and methodological foundations of the formation of reproducible logistics of the bread and bakery products market); analysis of dynamics series (calculation of indicators of bread and flour production in the section of different spheres of trade); method of comparison (estimation of economic indicators of various spheres and links of the market chain); structural analysis (estimation of the structure of added value of products); index method (estimation of price indices of grain products and wage indices); expert method (for determining the volumes of production in the spheres of partly and unregulated trade); abstract-logical (theoretical generalizations and formulation of conclusions). The information base of the study was the data of the State Statistics Service of Ukraine, analytical publications, and expert assessments of market specialists. Results. A methodical approach to the diagnosis of product circulation in the spheres of regulated, partially and unregulated goods movement of processing links of the market chain is proposed, based on the synthesis of statistical and expert methods, as well as the methodology for determining the main indicators of food safety. Using this approach, a trend of a significant reduction in the volume of bread production in the sphere of regulated commodity movement, a dynamic growth of bread consumption in the spheres of partially and unregulated commodity movement, inter-link interaction of three spheres of adjacent links (production of flour and bread) of the market chain was established. It was proved that the institutional transformations were unsystematic and isolated, did not ensure the reproductive and logistic development of the processing links of the market chain and the support of the consumer link. A structural model of institutional support for the reproduction logistics of the grain market was developed, focused on the integration of “shadow” segments into the sphere of regulated goods movement and a more equitable redistribution of added value between the links of the market chain. Originality / scientific novelty. For the first time, a theoretical and methodological approach to the assessment of the transformational influence of formal institutions on the logistics processes of commodity markets is substantiated by the decomposition of link flow processes by spheres of regulated, partially regulated and unregulated commodity traffic and a comprehensive assessment of the directions of interaction and volumes of commodity traffic of these spheres by component links of market chains, which allows determining the influence of modern trends of “shading” on the functioning of logistics chains of commodity markets, problem areas and “traps” in their institutional provision. Practical value / implications. The results of the study have important practical value for state authorities in regulating the socially significant bread market. Calculations of the production volumes of bread and flour in the spheres of partially and unregulated trade are carried out, which make it possible to identify latent trends in the development of adjacent markets, institutional factors influencing the growth of their “shadow” segments, the volumes of tax and reproductive losses. The proposed model of institutional provision of reproductive logistics can be used by state authorities in the course of reforming the institutional mechanism for regulating the grain market of Ukraine.

Suggested Citation

  • Zerkina, Oksana & Nikishyna, Oksana & Bondarenko, Svitlana & Makovoz, Оksana & Durbalova, Natalia, 2022. "Institutional support for formation of reproductive logistics on the bread and bakery market of Ukraine," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 8(3), September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:330344
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.330344
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/330344/files/8_Zerkina_article.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.330344?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Inna Irtyshcheva & Maryna Ponomarova & Iryna Dolzhykova, 2019. "Conceptual Fundamentals Of Development Of The Food Security System," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 5(2).
    2. Luisa Rivera-Basques, 2022. "Upgrading process in global value chains: Evidence from Latin American countries," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 32(1), pages 359-375, June.
    3. Raisa Bilovol & Alina Chaikina, 2016. "Improving Marketing Logistics Management Of Enterprises Of Agro-Industrial Complex," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 2(5).
    4. Olena Sakovska, 2020. "Agricultural Cooperation: Experience Of Foreign Countries For Ukraine," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 6(1).
    5. repec:thr:techub:10032:y:2022:i:1:p:359-375 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Oksana Nikishyna & Svitlana Bondarenko & Oksana Zerkina, 2018. "Methodological Provisions On The Performance Evaluation Of Agrarian Producers And Their Cooperative Associations In The Production And Supply Chain," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 4(5).
    7. Richard J. Sexton & Mingxia Zhang, 2001. "An assessment of the impact of food industry market power on U.S. consumers," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(1), pages 59-79.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Scalco, Paulo R. & Braga, Marcelo J., 2015. "Identification of Market Power in Bilateral Oligopoly: The Brazilian Wholesale Market of UHT Milk," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 212278, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Çakır, Metin & Nolan, James, 2015. "Revisiting Concentration in Food and Agricultural Supply Chains: The Welfare Implications of Market Power in a Complementary Input Sector," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 40(2), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Volpe, Richard J., III, 2011. "Evaluating the Performance of U.S. Supermarkets: Pricing Strategies, Competition from Hypermarkets, and Private Labels," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 36(3), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Perekhozhuk, Oleksandr, 2013. "Moderne Konzepte zur Analyse der Preisbildung auf dem Faktormarkt mit unvollständigem Wettbewerb," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue 4, pages 99-106.
    5. Oleksandr Perekhozhuk, 2013. "Modern Concepts for Pricing Analysis in Imperfect Competition Production Factor Market," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 4, pages 99-106, December.
    6. Franz Sinabell, 2005. "Marktspannen und Erzeugeranteil an den Ausgaben für Nahrungsmittel," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 25398, April.
    7. Hajderllari, Eliona & Karantininis, Kostas, 2011. "Genetically modified foods in vertically differentiated and vertically oligopolistic markets," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 114774, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Thomas Kopp & Richard J. Sexton, 2021. "Farmers, Traders, and Processors: Buyer Market Power and Double Marginalization in Indonesia," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(2), pages 543-568, March.
    9. Victor F. Moutinho & António C. Moreira & João Paulo C. Bento, 2018. "Strategic decisions on bilateral bidding behavior: evidence from a wholesale electricity market," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 54(3), pages 1353-1387, May.
    10. Johan F.M. Swinnen & Anneleen Vandeplas, 2010. "Market power and rents in global supply chains," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 41(s1), pages 109-120, November.
    11. Scalco, Paulo Roberto & Braga, Marcelo Jose, 2014. "Measuring the Degree of Oligopsony Power in the Brazilian Raw Milk Market," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 17(2), pages 1-20, May.
    12. Jo H.M. Wijnands & Harry J. Bremmers & Bernd M.J. van der Meulen & Krijn J. Poppe, 2008. "An economic and legal assessment of the EU food industry's competitiveness," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(4), pages 417-439.
    13. Skydan, Oleh & Budnik, Olha & Sus, Lesya, 2021. "The role of agroholdings in the creation of cooperatives by rural communities," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 7(3), September.
    14. Sanderson, Benjamin L & Coatney, Kalyn T & Parman, Bryon J & Tack, Jesse B, 2016. "A Theoretical Analysis of Multiproduct Mergers: Application in the Major Meat Sectors," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 236158, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    15. Daniele Cavicchioli, 2018. "Detecting Market Power Along Food Supply Chains: Evidence and Methodological Insights from the Fluid Milk Sector in Italy," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-22, December.
    16. Inna Irtyshcheva & Antonina Trushliakova & Ihor Sirenko, 2020. "Strategic Human Capital Management In The Context Of Digitalization," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 6(5).
    17. Daniele Cavicchioli & Luca Cacchiarelli & Alessandro Sorrentino & Roberto Pretolani, 2022. "Should We Cry over the Spilt Milk? Market Power and Structural Change along Dairy Supply Chains in EU Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-18, April.
    18. Rizwan Abbas & Gehad Abdullah Amran & Irshad Hussain & Shengjun Ma, 2022. "A Soft Computing View for the Scientific Categorization of Vegetable Supply Chain Issues," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-17, June.
    19. Lyudmila Levkovska & Inna Irtyshcheva & ²ryna Dubynska, 2020. "Current Trends In The Development Of The Water Management Complex: Ukrainian Realities And International Experience," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 6(5).
    20. Alessandro Bonanno & Carlo Russo & Luisa Menapace, 2018. "Market power and bargaining in agrifood markets: A review of emerging topics and tools," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(1), pages 6-23, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:330344. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.