IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/256388.html

Продуктивність Праці В Сільськогосподарських Підприємствах Харківської Області

Author

Listed:
  • Elina, Pakhucha

Abstract

The purpose of the article theoretical and practical aspects of increasing productivity in the agricultural enterprises of the theoretical foundations of productivity – essential characteristics of the economy. Increase productivity provides increased real product and income, and therefore it is an important indicator of economic growth. The study includes defining the essence of productivity, and methods of its determination. The article compared the methodology for determining productivity and defined benefit cost method. The analysis of labor productivity in the agricultural enterprises of the Kharkiv region. The dynamics of gross output, the average number of workers and labor productivity, which gave an idea of the trend in productivity. Also calculated indexes of labor productivity in agricultural enterprises. The main ways of increasing productivity. Presented stages of program performance management and defined their role in increasing productivity.

Suggested Citation

  • Elina, Pakhucha, . "Продуктивність Праці В Сільськогосподарських Підприємствах Харківської Області," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 1(2).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:256388
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.256388
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/256388/files/6Pakhucha_ARE_2015_Vol%201_No%202.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.256388?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ali, Daniel & Bowen, Derick & Deininger, Klaus & Duponchel, Marguerite, 2016. "Investigating the Gender Gap in Agricultural Productivity: Evidence from Uganda," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 152-170.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. João Morgado & Vincenzo Salvucci, 2016. "Gender divide in agricultural productivity in Mozambique," WIDER Working Paper Series 176, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    2. Waheed Mobolaji Ashagidigbi & Olajumoke Oluwatoyosi Orilua & Kehinde Ademola Olagunju & Abiodun Olusola Omotayo, 2022. "Gender, Empowerment and Food Security Status of Households in Nigeria," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-13, July.
    3. Khushbu Mishra & Abdoul G. Sam & Gracious M. Diiro & Mario J. Miranda, 2020. "Gender and the dynamics of technology adoption: Empirical evidence from a household‐level panel data," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 51(6), pages 857-870, November.
    4. Troncoso Sepúlveda, Ricardo Andrés & Gil Roig, José María, 2025. "The role of government credit in enhancing agricultural productivity: Evidence from Chile," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    5. Kwabena Nyarko Addai & Wencong Lu & Omphile Temoso, 2021. "Are Female Rice Farmers Less Productive than Male Farmers? Micro-evidence from Ghana," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 33(6), pages 1997-2039, December.
    6. Meinzen-Dick, Ruth & Quisumbing, Agnes & Doss, Cheryl & Theis, Sophie, 2019. "Women's land rights as a pathway to poverty reduction: Framework and review of available evidence," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 72-82.
    7. Stephen Prah & Bright Owusu Asante & John N. Ng’ombe, 2026. "Who Manages Better? Gendered Perspectives on Food Security and Subjective Wellbeing in Ghana," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 1-34, February.
    8. Heyuan You & Jingwang Li & Fangyi Xu, 2026. "Off-farm employment and nonpoint source pollution from chemical fertilizers in China: mediating role of farmland transfer," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 1787-1804, January.
    9. Girma Gezimu Gebre & Hiroshi Isoda & Dil Bahadur Rahut & Yuichiro Amekawa & Hisako Nomura, 2021. "Gender Gaps in Market Participation Among Individual and Joint Decision-Making Farm Households: Evidence from Southern Ethiopia," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 33(3), pages 649-683, June.
    10. Mwale, Martin Limbikani & Fintel, Dieter von & Marchetta, Francesca & Smith, Anja & Kamninga, Tony Mwenda, 2021. "The Negative Impact of Farm Input Subsidies on Women's Agency in Malawi's Matrilocal Settlements," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315041, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    11. Imre Fertő & Štefan Bojnec, 2025. "Gender Equality and Green Entrepreneurship in Farms," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(3), pages 3985-4008, June.
    12. Ambler, Kate & Jones, Kelly M. & O’Sullivan, Michael, 2026. "Increasing women’s empowerment: Evaluating two interventions in Uganda," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    13. Uzoamaka Joe-Nkamuke & Kehinde Oluseyi Olagunju & Esther Njuguna-Mungai & Kai Mausch, 2019. "Is there any gender gap in the production of legumes in Malawi? Evidence from the Oaxaca–Blinder decomposition model," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 100(1), pages 69-92, December.
    14. Mahajan, Kanika, 2019. "Back to the plough: Women managers and farm productivity in India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 1-1.
    15. Keenan, Michael & Pamuk, Haki & Ng'ang'a, Stanley Karanja & Hella, Joseph Phillip, 2021. "Investment and Household Bargaining in Small-scale Farming Households A Lab-in-the-Field Experiment from Rural Tanzania," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315291, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    16. Uzoamaka Joe-Nkamuke & Kehinde Oluseyi Olagunju & Esther Njuguna-Mungai & Kai Mausch, 2019. "Is there any gender gap in the production of legumesin Malawi? Evidence from the Oaxaca–Blinderdecomposition model," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 100(1-4), pages 69-92.
    17. Kirui, O., 2018. "Skill Development, Human Capital and Economic Outcomes: Impact of Post-Secondary Education among Smallholder Farmers in Africa," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277068, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    18. Canessa, Eugenia & Giannelli, Gianna Claudia, 2021. "Women's Employment and Natural Shocks," IZA Discussion Papers 14055, IZA Network @ LISER.
    19. Hirpa Tufa, Adane & Alene, Arega D. & Cole, Steven M. & Manda, Julius & Feleke, Shiferaw & Abdoulaye, Tahirou & Chikoye, David & Manyong, Victor, 2022. "Gender differences in technology adoption and agricultural productivity: Evidence from Malawi," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    20. Lecoutere, Els & Jassogne, Laurence, 2016. ""We're in this together": Changing intra-household decision making for more cooperative smallholder farming," IOB Working Papers 2016.02, Universiteit Antwerpen, Institute of Development Policy (IOB).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:256388. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.