IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/aolpei/276073.html

Selection of Communication Routes in Agriculture Equipment Company

Author

Listed:
  • Křečková, J.
  • Rydval, J.
  • Brožová, H.
  • Hornická, A.

Abstract

Many publications describe problems in businesses and project management that are caused by communication. Team communication is a very complicated process full of soft aspects. One of basic problems represents a choice of an appropriate communication route kind useful for messages transmission between the team members as sources and recipients. It is a complex issue because of necessity to evaluate individual communication routes from many different perspectives. Therefore the suitable communication route of team members can be selected by a multicriterial mathematical model. Since communication can be understood as a distribution of messages, the appropriate model form can be based on the distribution model. The proposed model is derived from the three-dimensional transportation problem. The article discusses the possibility of this approach on the case study of communication modelling in the field of agriculture. Specifically, it is constructed and solved a model of communication problem for small team of agriculture equipment dealers.

Suggested Citation

  • Křečková, J. & Rydval, J. & Brožová, H. & Hornická, A., 2017. "Selection of Communication Routes in Agriculture Equipment Company," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 9(4).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aolpei:276073
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.276073
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/276073/files/357_agris-on-line-2017-4-kreckova-rydval-brozova-honicka%20%281%29.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.276073?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. Morávek & M. Vlach, 1967. "Letter to the Editor—On the Necessary Conditions for the Existence of the Solution of the Multi-Index Transportation Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 542-545, June.
    2. Martin Hoegl & Hans Georg Gemuenden, 2001. "Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects: A Theoretical Concept and Empirical Evidence," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(4), pages 435-449, August.
    3. Hämäläinen, Raimo P. & Luoma, Jukka & Saarinen, Esa, 2013. "On the importance of behavioral operational research: The case of understanding and communicating about dynamic systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(3), pages 623-634.
    4. Stanley Zionts, 1979. "MCDM---If Not a Roman Numeral, Then What?," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 9(4), pages 94-101, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kennedy, Deanna M. & Sommer, S. Amy & Nguyen, Phuong Anh, 2017. "Optimizing multi-team system behaviors: Insights from modeling team communication," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(1), pages 264-278.
    2. Qiao, Yidan & Gao, Xinwei & Ma, Lin & Chen, Dengkai, 2024. "Dynamic human error risk assessment of group decision-making in extreme cooperative scenario," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    3. Khansa Hayat & Maryam Hafeez & Kanwal Bilal & Malik Shahzad Shabbir, 2022. "Interactive Effects of Organizational Structure and Team Work Quality on Project Success in Project Based Non ProfitOrganizations," iRASD Journal of Management, International Research Alliance for Sustainable Development (iRASD), vol. 4(1), pages 84-103, March.
    4. Cornelia Kerstin Schlott, 2024. "Design Thinking and teamwork—measuring impact: a systematic literature review," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 13(4), pages 163-196, December.
    5. Latif, Khawaja Fawad & Williams, Nigel, 2017. "Team effectiveness in Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) projects," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 20-32.
    6. Englmaier, Florian & Grimm, Stefan & Schindler, David & Schudy, Simeon, 2018. "The Effect of Incentives in Non-Routine Analytical Team Tasks – Evidence from a Field Experiment," VfS Annual Conference 2017 (Vienna): Alternative Structures for Money and Banking 168286, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    7. Alya J. Abuseem & Udechukwu Ojiako & Fikri T. Dweiri, 2024. "Overcoming ignorance and the unknown in UAE projects: the role of improvisation," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 15(3), pages 871-897, March.
    8. Proserpio, Luigi & Magni, Massimo, 2012. "Teaching without the teacher? Building a learning environment through computer simulations," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 99-105.
    9. Hernan Casakin & Shalom Levy, 2023. "Measuring Behaviors for Assessing Design Expertise: A Comprehensive Framework for Professional Development," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, November.
    10. Verworn, Birgit, 2009. "A structural equation model of the impact of the "fuzzy front end" on the success of new product development," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 1571-1581, December.
    11. Osório, António (António Miguel), 2017. "Self-interest and Equity Concerns: A Behavioural Allocation Rule for Operational Problems," Working Papers 2072/290757, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Economics.
    12. Junyi Chai & Zhiquan Weng & Wenbin Liu, 2021. "Behavioral Decision Making in Normative and Descriptive Views: A Critical Review of Literature," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-14, October.
    13. Richard Ormerod, 2017. "Writing practitioner case studies to help behavioural OR researchers ground their theories: application of the mangle perspective," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(5), pages 507-520, May.
    14. Amélie Thery & Michel Verstraeten, 2018. "Highlighting the Relations between Interaction Types in Meetings and Group Performance," Working Papers CEB 18-011, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    15. Rajiv D. Banker & Indranil Bardhan & Ozer Asdemir, 2006. "Understanding the Impact of Collaboration Software on Product Design and Development," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 352-373, December.
    16. Lucia Bellenzier & J{o}rgen Vitting Andersen & Giulia Rotundo, 2016. "Contagion in the world's stock exchanges seen as a set of coupled oscillators," Papers 1602.07452, arXiv.org.
    17. Hasan Muhammad Baniamin & Ishtiaq Jamil & Narendra Raj Paudel, 2025. "Effects of Peers' Performance Nature on an Employee: An Experimental Exploration of Nepalese Civil Service," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 311-326, March.
    18. Merrick, James H. & Weyant, John P., 2019. "On choosing the resolution of normative models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(2), pages 511-523.
    19. V. Wickramasinghe & M.N. Chathurani, 2021. "Effects of continuous improvement in streamlining HRM practices," Post-Print hal-05458948, HAL.
    20. Seongkyoon Jeong & Jae Young Choi, 2012. "The taxonomy of research collaboration in science and technology: evidence from mechanical research through probabilistic clustering analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 91(3), pages 719-735, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aolpei:276073. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fevszcz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.