Author
Listed:
- Okurut, Samuel
- Walozi, Ronald
- Saasa, Richard A.
- Candia, Alphonse
- Tumuhimbise, Robooni
- Gidoi, Robert
- Oule, Arnold B.
- Balibuzani, Ronald
- Mbadhi, Ibrahim
Abstract
Animal Traction (AT) remains a critical intermediate mechanization pathway for smallholder farmers in Eastern Uganda, yet empirical evidence on its economic performance remains limited. This study evaluated the profitability and investment viability of two enterprise models, namely Basic Animal Traction (BAT) and Advanced Animal Traction (AAT), among smallholder farmers in the Busoga sub-region. A mixed-methods research design was used, comprising a household survey of 664 households, 23 Focus Group Discussions (FGDs), and 68 key informant interviews across five districts. Financial viability was evaluated over a six-year investment period using Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), Gross Margin (GM), and Payback Period metrics, along with sensitivity analysis. The results indicated that AT systems are integrated within smallholder production systems characterized by small landholdings (average 1.66 ha), mixed crop-livestock enterprises, and dependence on family labour. Cost structure analysis showed significant initial capital requirements, with fixed costs accounting for about 55% of total investment for both BAT (UGX 5.88 million) and AAT (UGX 9.50 million), posing a major adoption barrier. Despite this, both models performed strongly financially under baseline conditions. For maize and bean production, BAT achieved IRRs of 57-76%, NPVs of UGX 22.2-29.8 million, and payback periods of less than 1.1 years. AAT reached higher IRRs (73-82%), NPVs (UGX 41.6-47.0 million), and gross margins (36.4-38.6%), due to additional income from planting and weeding hire services. Sensitivity analysis indicated that profitability is sensitive to 15-25% reductions in output and to excessive reinvestment of hire-service revenues, underscoring the need for risk management and careful capital planning. While AAT offers greater income-growth potential, BAT offers a lower-capital, lower-risk entry pathway. Overall, AT offers a profitable, suitable, and expandable mechanization option. Policy support should focus on affordable financing, technical skills development, service diversification, and gender-sensitive approaches to encourage inclusive mechanization.
Suggested Citation
Okurut, Samuel & Walozi, Ronald & Saasa, Richard A. & Candia, Alphonse & Tumuhimbise, Robooni & Gidoi, Robert & Oule, Arnold B. & Balibuzani, Ronald & Mbadhi, Ibrahim, 2026.
"Profitability Analysis of Animal Traction for Smallholder Farmers in Eastern Uganda: A Case of Busoga Sub-region,"
Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, vol. 44(3).
Handle:
RePEc:ags:ajaees:402837
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:402837. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journalajaees.com/index.php/AJAEES/index .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.