IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ajaees/367404.html

Elicitation of Prior Knowledge: A Vital First Step for Engaging Pupils in Training

Author

Listed:
  • Chander, Mahesh
  • Handage, Sushant
  • Joshi, Pragya

Abstract

The paper emphasizes the importance of understanding the prior knowledge of trainees as a pre-requisite for designing an effective training programme. Data on prior knowledge of trainees and their attitude towards extension services were elicited from 153 extension service providers (ESPs) of varied disciplines using a semi-structured interview schedule. The interview focussed on the extension advisory services and the agriculture extension policy in India. The results show that ESPs carried misconceptions and stereotyped opinions towards various aspects of the extension system. An effort was done by the researcher to address the popular misconceptions, debunk myths with truth and persuading the trainees towards delivering effective extension services well within the recommended resource availability.

Suggested Citation

  • Chander, Mahesh & Handage, Sushant & Joshi, Pragya, 2023. "Elicitation of Prior Knowledge: A Vital First Step for Engaging Pupils in Training," Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, vol. 41(3), pages 1-4.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:367404
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/367404/files/Handage4132023AJAEES97195.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ivar Krumpal, 2013. "Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: a literature review," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 2025-2047, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eduardo Lora & Miguel Benítez & Diego Gutiérrez, 2024. "Annualizing labor market, inequality, and poverty indicators," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 22(1), pages 131-164, March.
    2. repec:plo:pone00:0214678 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Roh, Taewoo & Seok, Junhee & Kim, Yaeri, 2022. "Unveiling ways to reach organic purchase: Green perceived value, perceived knowledge, attitude, subjective norm, and trust," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    4. Liu Liu & Xiaotao Wang & Binli Chen & Wing-Hong Chui & Xiying Wang, 2022. "Association between Child Abuse, Depression, and School Bullying among Chinese Secondary School Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-12, December.
    5. McCoy, Selina & Carroll, Eamonn & Ye, Keyu, 2024. "Embracing Diversity in all its Forms : The Voluntary Secondary Sector in Irish Education," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number RS182.
    6. Austmann, Leonhard M. & Vigne, Samuel A., 2021. "Does environmental awareness fuel the electric vehicle market? A Twitter keyword analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    7. Jessica Gabriele Walter, 2018. "The adequacy of measures of gender roles attitudes: a review of current measures in omnibus surveys," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 829-848, March.
    8. Bernard GAUTHIER & Frédéric LESNÉ, 2017. "Measuring corruption in presence of reticent respondents: Theory and Application," Working Papers P207, FERDI.
    9. Johan Lindeque & Olga Samuel & Corin Kraft, 2022. "Small Businesses’ Social Responsibility and Political Activity Survey Studies: A Review, Synthesis, and Research Agenda," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    10. Giorgio Piccitto & Hans M. A. Schadee & Gabriele Ballarino, 2023. "Job Satisfaction and Gender in Italy: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 169(3), pages 775-793, October.
    11. Kuehnle, Daniel, 2019. "How effective are pictorial warnings on tobacco products? New evidence on smoking behaviour using Australian panel data," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    12. Burke, Mary A. & Carman, Katherine G., 2017. "You can be too thin (but not too tall): Social desirability bias in self-reports of weight and height," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 27(PA), pages 198-222.
    13. Francesco Testa & Silvia Sarti & Marco Frey, 2019. "Are green consumers really green? Exploring the factors behind the actual consumption of organic food products," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 327-338, February.
    14. Anne Nassauer & Nicolas M. Legewie, 2021. "Video Data Analysis: A Methodological Frame for a Novel Research Trend," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 50(1), pages 135-174, February.
    15. repec:plo:pone00:0217595 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. World Bank, 2021. "Mozambique - Country Economic Memorandum," World Bank Publications - Reports 37525, The World Bank Group.
    17. Castillo, Jose G. & Hernandez, Manuel A., 2022. "The unintended consequences of confinement due to COVID-19: Evidence from the rural area in Guatemala," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322306, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    18. Henrik Kenneth Andersen & Jochen Mayerl & Elmar Schlüter, 2025. "Implicit discriminatory attitudes in surveys: validation of the semantic affect misattribution procedure for dealing with social desirability in surveys," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(4), pages 3159-3185, August.
    19. Steffen Grebe & Svenja Jarchow, 2025. "“The dynamics of IP contract patterns in the German biotechnology industry – a mixed-methods approach”," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 95(1), pages 75-102, January.
    20. Sundström, Aksel, 2016. "Corruption and Violations of Conservation Rules: A Survey Experiment with Resource Users," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 73-83.
    21. Navid Aghakhani & Onook Oh & Dawn Gregg & Hemant Jain, 2023. "How Review Quality and Source Credibility Interacts to Affect Review Usefulness: An Expansion of the Elaboration Likelihood Model," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 1513-1531, August.
    22. Jauhar Faradis & Mukhamad Yazid Afandi, 2026. "Continuance intention of Islamic internet-only banks: lessons learned from Indonesian users," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 31(1), pages 1-15, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:367404. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journalajaees.com/index.php/AJAEES/index .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.