IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ajaees/357471.html

Effect of Income and Economies of Scale on Household Food Demand in Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Rehman, Abdur
  • Jian, Wang
  • Wensheng, Sun
  • Niya, Liu

Abstract

This paper determines the household food demand for various income groups in Pakistan namely, The Lower Income Group (≤ $ 93.023), Lower-middle Income Group ( $93.034-139.534), Middle Income Group ($139.546-209.302), Upper-middle Income Group ($ 209.314-406.977) and Upper Income Group ($406.977+) United States dollars respectively. The Pakistani rupees are converted into US $ according to the average exchange rate of (2010-11).The study uses Pakistan Social and Living Standard Measurement Survey data (2010-11) conducted by the Federal Bureau of Statistics, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad. The food expenditures are the sum of monthly expenditures by each household on the following 16 major food items, wheat, rice, pulses, vegetables ghee, Milk (Fresh), butter, mutton, beef, chicken, fish, fruits, vegetables, salt, spices, sugar and gur. The household size and income elasticities are estimated to explain the food consumption trends in Pakistan. The results of the study indicate that all the income and household size elasticities are positive and significant at one percent level of significance. And the study also indicates that food income elasticity is the highest (0.901) for the Lower-Middle Income Group and the same is the lowest (0.716) for the Upper Income Group. Similarly, household size elasticity is the highest (0.181) for the Upper Income Group and the same is the lowest (0.067) for Lower Income Group. It is highly recommended that family planning system should be introduced in the country to keep away from the harmful impact of large family sizes upon the household food consumption, and it is also necessary for policy makers to make plan to improve the food availability and to increase family income to develop the standard and quality of the rural people of Pakistan.

Suggested Citation

  • Rehman, Abdur & Jian, Wang & Wensheng, Sun & Niya, Liu, 2014. "Effect of Income and Economies of Scale on Household Food Demand in Pakistan," Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, vol. 3(3).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:357471
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/357471/files/Rehman332013AJAEES6938.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tokoyama, Yuki & Takagi, Shingo & Ishibashi, Kimiko & Chern, Wen S., 2002. "Recent Food Consumption Pattern Of Japanese Households: Driving Forces Behind Westernization," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19712, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. Angus Deaton & Christina Paxson, 1998. "Economies of Scale, Household Size, and the Demand for Food," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 106(5), pages 897-930, October.
    3. Nadeem A. Burney & Ashfaque H. Khan, 1991. "Household Consumption Patterns in Pakistan: An Urban-Rural Comparison Using Micro Data," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 30(2), pages 145-171.
    4. Ulrich Witt, 2001. "special issue: Learning to consume - A theory of wants and the growth of demand," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 23-36.
    5. Sohail J. Malik & Naeem Sarwar, 1993. "Some Tests for Differences in Consumption Patterns: The Impact of Remittances Using Household Income and Expenditure Survey Data of Pakistan 1987-88," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 32(4), pages 699-711.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eatzaz Ahmad & Muhammad Arshad, 2007. "Household Budget Analysis for Pakistan under Varying the Parameter Approach," Microeconomics Working Papers 22180, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    2. Martin Binder, 2019. "Soft paternalism and subjective well-being: how happiness research could help the paternalist improve individuals’ well-being," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 539-561, April.
    3. Pierre Bachas & Lucie Gadenne & Anders Jensen, 2024. "Informality, Consumption Taxes, and Redistribution," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 91(5), pages 2604-2634.
    4. Leonhard K. Lades, 2012. "The impact of differential satiation dynamics on changing consumer behavior, wellbeing, and innovative activity," Papers on Economics and Evolution 2012-16, Philipps University Marburg, Department of Geography.
    5. Kaus, Wolfhard, 2013. "Beyond Engel's law - A cross-country analysis," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 118-134.
    6. Wolfgang J. Fellner & Roman J. Seidl, 2015. "Satiated Consumers: Allocation of Consumption Time in an Affluent Society," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 66(3), pages 534-563, July.
    7. Koulovatianos, Christos & Schroder, Carsten & Schmidt, Ulrich, 2005. "On the income dependence of equivalence scales," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(5-6), pages 967-996, June.
    8. Jed Friedman, 2003. "How Responsive is Poverty to Growth? A Regional Analysis of Poverty, Inequality, and Growth in Indonesia, 1984-99," WIDER Working Paper Series DP2003-57, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    9. Jha, Raghbendra & Biswal, Bagala & Biswal, Urvashi D., 2001. "An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Public Expenditures on Education and Health on Poverty in Indian States," Queen's Economics Department Working Papers 273424, Queen's University - Department of Economics.
    10. Murray Leibbrandt & James Levinsohn & Justin McCrary, 2005. "Incomes in South Africa since the fall of Apartheid," Working Papers 536, Research Seminar in International Economics, University of Michigan.
    11. Araya, Girmay Berhe & Holden, Stein T., 2025. "Social Protection and Household Composition: A Panel Data Analysis of Tigrai, Northern Ethiopia," CLTS Working Papers 2/25, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Centre for Land Tenure Studies.
    12. Julia Jadin & Florine Le Henaff, 2024. "The Differential impact of Covid-19 on Household Carbon Footprint: A Gender Perspective," Working Papers ECARES 2024-09, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    13. Witt Ulrich, 2012. "Ordnungsökonomik und Soziale Marktwirtschaft in Bedrängnis / Ordo-liberalism and the German “Social Market Economy” in qunadary?," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 63(1), pages 159-178, January.
    14. Quisumbing, Agnes R. & Haddad, Lawrence James & Pena, Christine, 2001. "Are Women Overrepresented Among The Poor? An Analysis Of Poverty In Ten Developing Countries," Discussion Paper Briefs 16006, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    15. McKenzie, David J., 2003. "How do Households Cope with Aggregate Shocks? Evidence from the Mexican Peso Crisis," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 31(7), pages 1179-1199, July.
    16. Francis Teal, 2006. "Consumption and welfare in Ghana in the 1990s," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(7), pages 1252-1269.
    17. Brzozowski, Matthew & Crossley, Thomas F. & Winter, Joachim K., 2017. "Does survey recall error explain the Deaton–Paxson puzzle?," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 18-20.
    18. Witt, Ulrich & Binder, Martin, 2013. "Disentangling motivational and experiential aspects of “utility” – A neuroeconomics perspective," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 27-40.
    19. repec:osf:socarx:nbwf6_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. repec:hal:cepnwp:hal-02881695 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Scott L. Mitchell & Mark D. Packard & Brent B. Clark, 2022. "Decentralizing corporate governance? A praxeological inquiry," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(4), pages 413-429, December.
    22. Chakra P ACHARYA & Roberto LEON-GONZALEZ, 2013. "The Impact of Remittance on Poverty and Inequality: A Micro-Simulation Study for Nepal," Asian Journal of Empirical Research, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 3(9), pages 1061-1080.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:357471. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journalajaees.com/index.php/AJAEES/index .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.