IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/aaeatr/377660.html

Buyer Market Power in the U.S. Broiler Chicken Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Bolotova, Yuliya V.

Abstract

The motivations for this case study are recent developments in the U.S. broiler chicken industry involving allegations of an illegal exercise of buyer market power by the five largest broiler processors in the country in the market for broiler grow-out services. This case study introduces economic, business, and legal issues related to the alleged input price-fixing cartel of the five largest broiler processors. The case study describes the processors’ conduct and presents a theoretical framework that may explain market and price effects of the alleged input price-fixing cartel. The teaching note provides suggested answers to discussion and analytical questions, and it also includes multiple-choice questions that can be used as in-class assignments, quizzes, and exam questions. This case study is suitable for a variety of undergraduate and graduate courses taught in agricultural economics and agribusiness programs and for Extension and outreach audiences.

Suggested Citation

  • Bolotova, Yuliya V., 2025. "Buyer Market Power in the U.S. Broiler Chicken Industry," Applied Economics Teaching Resources (AETR), Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 7(4), August.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaeatr:377660
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/377660/files/AETR_2025_0209%20Final.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Charles R. Knoeber & Walter N. Thurman, 1995. ""Don't Count Your Chickens...": Risk and Risk Shifting in the Broiler Industry," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 77(3), pages 486-496.
    2. MacDonald, James M., 2008. "The Economic Organization of U.S. Broiler Production," Economic Information Bulletin 58627, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Bolotova, Yuliya V., 2022. "Teaching Forward Contracts in Undergraduate Courses in Agribusiness and Agricultural Economics Programs," Applied Economics Teaching Resources (AETR), Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 4(4), September.
    4. Lidan Ha & Guisseppi Forgionne, 2006. "Econometric Simulation for E-Business Strategy Evaluation," International Journal of E-Business Research (IJEBR), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 2(2), pages 38-53, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bolotova, Yuliya V., 2024. "Market Power in the U.S. Peanut Industry," Applied Economics Teaching Resources (AETR), Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 5(4), January.
    2. repec:ags:aaea22:344127 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Bolotova, Yuliya V., 2024. "Production Contracts and Buyer Market Power in the U.S. Broiler Chicken Industry," 2024 Annual Meeting, July 28-30, New Orleans, LA 344127, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. Zhen Wang & Tomislav Vukina, 2017. "Welfare effects of payment truncation in piece rate tournaments," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 120(3), pages 219-249, April.
    5. John Bovay, 2025. "Shaming, stringency, and shirking: Evidence from food‐safety inspections," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 107(1), pages 152-180, January.
    6. Fraser, Iain, 2005. "Microeconometric analysis of wine grape supply contracts in Australia," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 49(01), pages 1-24.
    7. Vukina, Tomislav, 2001. "Vertical Integration And Contracting In The U.S. Poultry Sector," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 32(2), pages 1-10, July.
    8. Hudson, Darren, 2000. "Contracting In Agriculture: A Primer For Farm Lenders," Research Reports 15789, Mississippi State University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    9. Rachael Goodhue & Leo Simon, 2016. "Agricultural contracts, adverse selection, and multiple inputs," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 4(1), pages 1-33, December.
    10. Westgren, Randall E., 2000. "THE 3 Rs OF STRATEGIC ALLIANCE FORMATION: RESOURCES, RENTS, AND (PROPERTY) RIGHTS," 2000 Producer Marketing and Risk Management Conference, January 13-14, Orlando, FL 19577, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    11. Gaetano Martino & Paolo Polinori, 2011. "Productive process innovation as sequential adjustment of the hybrid governance structure: the case of the poultry sector," Quaderni del Dipartimento di Economia, Finanza e Statistica 88/2011, Università di Perugia, Dipartimento Economia.
    12. Sudha Narayanan, 2012. "Safe gambles? Farmer perceptions of transactional certainty and risk-return tradeoffs in contract farming schemes in Southern India," Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai Working Papers 2012-021, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai, India.
    13. Buhr, Brian L. & Smith, Rodney B.W., 1998. "Formula Market Contracts In The Swine Industry," Conference Papers 14483, University of Minnesota, Center for International Food and Agricultural Policy.
    14. Goodrich, Brittney K. & Goodhue, Rachael E., 2020. "Are All Colonies Created Equal? The Role of Honey Bee Colony Strength in Almond Pollination Contracts," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    15. A. Ford Ramsey & Barry Goodwin & Mildred Haley, 2021. "Labor Dynamics and Supply Chain Disruption in Food Manufacturing," NBER Chapters, in: Risks in Agricultural Supply Chains, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Wu, Steven Y., 2013. "Adapting Contract Theory to Fit Contract Farming," 2014 Allied Social Sciences Association (ASSA) Annual Meeting, January 3-5, 2014, Philadelphia, PA 161894, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    17. Thomsen, Michael R. & Goodwin, Harold L., Jr. & Rodriquez, Angela, 2004. "The Sky Is Falling: An Examination Of Broiler Contract Design And Grower Revenues," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 20418, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    18. Olesen, H. B., 2003. "Contract production of peas," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 29-50, February.
    19. Theofanis Tsoulouhas, 2017. "Do tournaments solve the adverse selection problem?," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 675-690, September.
    20. Love, H. Alan & Burton, Diana M., 1999. "A Strategic Rationale For Captive Supplies," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 24(01), pages 1-18, July.
    21. Poray, Michael C. & Gray, Allan W. & Boehlje, Michael, 2002. "Evaluation of Alternative Coordination Systems Between Producers and Packers in the Pork Value Chain," Staff Papers 200386, Purdue University, Department of Agricultural Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaeatr:377660. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.