IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/jetimm/v1y2016i1p156-166.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrated Marketing Communication Tools: Traditional vs. Modern

Author

Listed:
  • Olimpia Oancea

    (University of Pitesti)

  • Amalia Dutu

    (University of Pitesti)

  • Mihaela Diaconu

    (University of Pitesti)

  • Mihaela Brinzea

    (University of Pitesti)

Abstract

This paper proposes to provide a conceptual framework regarding integrated marketing communication tools modern versus traditional. The results of research performed offer the answer at the question: "Are the communication tools modern completely different from those traditional or the principles are the same and differ only new media platforms?". The simplest answer to this question is that probably not really matter as they are called, traditional communication tools or modern communication tools, it is very important how they can create value and efficiency in a world where predominates communications technology. The main conclusions of this study show the fact that in a global market characterized by a high dynamism and strong competition, the challenge for most companies is to identify the most effective tools through which to communicate with actual and potential customers. If initially, the concept of integrated marketing communication took into account the needs and the interests of customers, based on the premise that the integration of its components represents a value both for the customers and for the companies, today it is a certainty that the market is headed and influenced by the customers. Any integrated marketing communication plan should start with a careful analysis of the company's image, the buying behavior of the consumers and communication opportunities. The next important step consist in identification and using the tools of integrated marketing communication considered to be consistent and effective in communication activities of a company.

Suggested Citation

  • Olimpia Oancea & Amalia Dutu & Mihaela Diaconu & Mihaela Brinzea, 2016. "Integrated Marketing Communication Tools: Traditional vs. Modern," Journal of Emerging Trends in Marketing and Management, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 1(1), pages 156-166, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:aes:jetimm:v:1:y:2016:i:1:p:156-166
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.etimm.ase.ro/RePEc/aes/jetimm/2016/ETIMM_V01_2016_76.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Feng, Jie & Papatla, Purushottam, 2011. "Advertising: Stimulant or Suppressant of Online Word of Mouth?," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 75-84.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Yubo & Fay, Scott & Wang, Qi, 2011. "The Role of Marketing in Social Media: How Online Consumer Reviews Evolve," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 85-94.
    2. Mitchell J. Lovett & Renana Peres & Linli Xu, 2019. "Can your advertising really buy earned impressions? The effect of brand advertising on word of mouth," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 215-255, September.
    3. Jian Feng & Bin Liu, 2018. "Dynamic Impact of Online Word-of-Mouth and Advertising on Supply Chain Performance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, January.
    4. Yuh-Jen Chen & Yuh-Min Chen & Chien-Wei Fu, 2017. "Identifying Desirable Product Specifications from Target Customers’ Chinese eWOM," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(02), pages 545-572, March.
    5. Kostyra, Daniel S. & Reiner, Jochen & Natter, Martin & Klapper, Daniel, 2016. "Decomposing the effects of online customer reviews on brand, price, and product attributes," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 11-26.
    6. Feng, Jie & Papatla, Purushottam, 2012. "Is Online Word of Mouth Higher for New Models or Redesigns? An Investigation of the Automobile Industry," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 92-101.
    7. Moez LTIFI, 2014. "Determinants of Positive Word of Mouth in the Tunisian Tourism Sector," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 2(4), pages 107-122, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Integrated marketing communication; modern communication tools; traditional communication tools.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M30 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - General
    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing
    • M39 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:jetimm:v:1:y:2016:i:1:p:156-166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucian Onisor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.