IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/amfeco/v28y2026i72p789.html

Integrating Fuzzy-BWM and MULTIMORA for Agricultural Sustainability Assessment: A Conceptual Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Justas Streimikis

    (Vytautas Magnus University, Agriculture Academy, Bioeconomy Research Institute, Kaunas region, Lithuania)

  • Astrida Miceikiene

    (Vytautas Magnus University, Agriculture Academy, Bioeconomy Research Institute, Kaunas region, Lithuania)

Abstract

Agricultural sustainability assessment has become increasingly complex in the context of the low-carbon transition, as agricultural systems are expected to balance economic viability, environmental protection, and social considerations under conditions of uncertainty and conflicting objectives. Traditional assessment methods that rely on single indicators or deterministic evaluation methods do not provide decision support, particularly in situations where trade-offs and qualitative judgments are critical. Thus, there is a need for clearly outlined decision-support frameworks that cover different dimensions of sustainability and incorporate varying degrees of uncertainty. This study seeks to develop a conceptual methodological framework design for agricultural sustainability assessment that combines the Fuzzy Best-Worst method (Fuzzy-BWM) with the MULTIMORA approach. This framework integrates Fuzzy-BWM with decision-support structures to address each of the evaluation dimensions and to incorporate multi-perspective assessments of alternatives. This study prioritizes the integration of concepts and the complementarity of methodologies of the multi-criteria decision-making approaches over empirical application or numerical validation. The sequence-based assessment logic within the proposed framework separates the definition of the criterion, the weighting of the criterion, and the multi-dimensional assessment. While MULTIMORA provides stable and interpretable rankings across various evaluation perspectives, Fuzzy-BWM captures the expert assessment and the linguistic uncertainty pertaining to the importance of the criteria. This functional separation improves transparency and avoids the mixing of the assessment of uncertainty and the assessment of relative performance. From the perspective of agricultural decision-making under the low-carbon transition, the framework provides a reference model that is flexible and adaptable, and facilitates learning and dialogue processes more than prescriptive processes. Empirical application and validation are identified as important directions for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Justas Streimikis & Astrida Miceikiene, 2026. "Integrating Fuzzy-BWM and MULTIMORA for Agricultural Sustainability Assessment: A Conceptual Framework," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 28(72), pages 789-789, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:28:y:2026:i:72:p:789
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro/temp/Article_3548.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abdallah Alaoui & Lúcia Barão & Carla S. S. Ferreira & Rudi Hessel, 2022. "An Overview of Sustainability Assessment Frameworks in Agriculture," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-26, April.
    2. Hana Ayadi & Nadia Hamani & Lyes Kermad & Mounir Benaissa, 2021. "Novel Fuzzy Composite Indicators for Locating a Logistics Platform under Sustainability Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-37, April.
    3. Justas Streimikis & Tomas Baležentis, 2020. "Agricultural sustainability assessment framework integrating sustainable development goals and interlinked priorities of environmental, climate and agriculture policies," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(6), pages 1702-1712, November.
    4. Tomas Karpavicius & Tomas Balezentis, 2025. "From energy islands to EU grid: Baltic progress through the lens of the Energy Trilemma Index during 2000-2023," Transformations and Sustainability, Centre for Productivity and Sustainability Analysis, vol. 1(1), pages 63-86.
    5. Pierre Bisquert & Abdelraouf Hecham & Patrice Buche & Maksim Koptelov, 2025. "Justified Preference Aggregation in Agri-Food Systems: An Approach, Argumentation Methods, and Tools," International Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Information Systems (IJAEIS), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 16(1), pages 1-26, January.
    6. Myriam Pham‐Truffert & Florence Metz & Manuel Fischer & Henri Rueff & Peter Messerli, 2020. "Interactions among Sustainable Development Goals: Knowledge for identifying multipliers and virtuous cycles," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(5), pages 1236-1250, September.
    7. Babak Daneshvar Rouyendegh & Şeyda Savalan, 2022. "An Integrated Fuzzy MCDM Hybrid Methodology to Analyze Agricultural Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-16, April.
    8. Dharmalingam Marimuthu & Ieva Meidute-Kavaliauskiene & Ghanshaym S. Mahapatra & Renata Činčikaitė & Pratik Roy & Aidas Vasilis Vasiliauskas, 2022. "Sustainable Urban Conveyance Selection through MCGDM Using a New Ranking on Generalized Interval Type-2 Trapezoidal Fuzzy Number," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(23), pages 1-23, November.
    9. Sen Guo & Wenyue Zhang & Xiao Gao, 2020. "Business Risk Evaluation of Electricity Retail Company in China Using a Hybrid MCDM Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, March.
    10. repec:gam:jeners:v:19:y:2026:i:2:p:436-:d:1841660 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Mohammadi, Majid & Rezaei, Jafar, 2020. "Bayesian best-worst method: A probabilistic group decision making model," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    12. Hamid El Bilali & Carola Strassner & Tarek Ben Hassen, 2021. "Sustainable Agri-Food Systems: Environment, Economy, Society, and Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-67, June.
    13. Jan Anton van Zanten & Rob van Tulder, 2021. "Improving companies' impacts on sustainable development: A nexus approach to the SDGS," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 3703-3720, December.
    14. Dalia Streimikiene & Ahmad Bathaei, 2025. "Evaluating and ranking quality education for sustainable development in the Baltic States: A multi-criteria decision-making approach using Eurostat data," Transformations and Sustainability, Centre for Productivity and Sustainability Analysis, vol. 1(1), pages 12-29.
    15. Patrizia Lombardi & Elena Todella, 2023. "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to Evaluate Sustainability and Circularity in Agricultural Waste Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-17, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yana Duan & Yang Sun & Yu Zhang & Xiaoqi Fan & Qinghuan Dong & Sen Guo, 2021. "Risk Evaluation of Electric Power Grid Investment in China Employing a Hybrid Novel MCDM Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-22, February.
    2. Gul, Muhammet & Yucesan, Melih, 2022. "Performance evaluation of Turkish Universities by an integrated Bayesian BWM-TOPSIS model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    3. Wan-Chi Jackie Hsu & Huai-Wei Lo & Chin-Cheng Yang, 2021. "The Formulation of Epidemic Prevention Work of COVID-19 for Colleges and Universities: Priorities and Recommendations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    4. Sacha Amaruzaman & Douglas K. Bardsley & Randy Stringer, 2023. "Analysing agricultural policy outcomes in the uplands of Indonesia: A multi‐dimensional sustainability assessment," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 1937-1950, June.
    5. Walter Leal Filho & Marina Kovaleva & Stella Tsani & Diana-Mihaela Țîrcă & Chris Shiel & Maria Alzira Pimenta Dinis & Melanie Nicolau & Mihaela Sima & Barbara Fritzen & Amanda Lange Salvia & Aprajita , 2023. "Promoting gender equality across the sustainable development goals," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(12), pages 14177-14198, December.
    6. Rekha Rao-Nicholson & Htwe Htwe Thein & Yifan Zhong, 2024. "A thematic analysis of the links between multinational enterprises’ corporate social responsibility and the Sustainable Development Goals in Myanmar," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(2), pages 203-223, June.
    7. Carolina Bueno & Rafael Macharete & Clarice Araújo Rodrigues & Felipe Kamia & Juliana Moreira & Camila Rizzini Freitas & Marco Nascimento & Carlos Grabois Gadelha, 2025. "Global Knowledge Asymmetries in Health: A Data-Driven Analysis of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-21, July.
    8. Azam Modares & Nasser Motahari Farimani & Kimia Abdari, 2025. "An integrated Bayesian best–worst method and Taguchi loss function for measuring quality in supply chain management," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 16(11), pages 3758-3783, November.
    9. Xufeng Cui & Ting Cai & Wei Deng & Rui Zheng & Yuehua Jiang & Hongjie Bao, 2022. "Indicators for Evaluating High-Quality Agricultural Development: Empirical Study from Yangtze River Economic Belt, China," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 164(3), pages 1101-1127, December.
    10. Idiano D'Adamo & Massimo Gastaldi & Ilhan Ozturk, 2023. "The sustainable development of mobility in the green transition: Renewable energy, local industrial chain, and battery recycling," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 840-852, April.
    11. Chen, Xu & Li, Mince & Chen, Zonghai, 2023. "Meta rule-based energy management strategy for battery/supercapacitor hybrid electric vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    12. Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Zolfani & Ramin Bazrafshan & Fatih Ecer & Çağlar Karamaşa, 2022. "The Suitability-Feasibility-Acceptability Strategy Integrated with Bayesian BWM-MARCOS Methods to Determine the Optimal Lithium Battery Plant Located in South America," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(14), pages 1-18, July.
    13. Dilupa Nakandala & Yung Po Tsang & Henry Lau & Carman Ka Man Lee, 2022. "An Industrial Blockchain-Based Multi-Criteria Decision Framework for Global Freight Management in Agricultural Supply Chains," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-23, September.
    14. Zhou, Yaoming & Kundu, Tanmoy & Goh, Mark & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2023. "Beyond throughput: Incorporating air transport network topology in airport performance measurement," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    15. Pablo Aragonés‐Beltrán & Mª. Carmen González‐Cruz & Astrid León‐Camargo & Rosario Viñoles‐Cebolla, 2023. "Assessment of regional development needs according to criteria based on the Sustainable Development Goals in the Meta Region (Colombia)," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 1101-1121, April.
    16. Herenia Gutiérrez‐Ponce, 2023. "Sustainability as a strategy base in Spanish firms: Sustainability reports and performance on the sustainable development goals," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(4), pages 3008-3023, August.
    17. Christian Nielsen, 2023. "ESG Reporting and Metrics: From Double Materiality to Key Performance Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-15, December.
    18. Tariq Elrazaz & Ahmed Shaker Samaan & Moataz Elmassri, 2024. "Sustainable development goals: Sustainability reporting challenges in the United Arab Emirates context," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 3100-3114, August.
    19. Amanda Balasooriya & Darshana Sedera, 2025. "Top Management Challenges in Using Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable Development Goals: An Exploratory Case Study of an Australian Agribusiness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-19, July.
    20. Min Cao & Min Chen & Junze Zhang & Prajal Pradhan & Huadong Guo & Bojie Fu & Yue Li & Yuying Bai & Lijiao Chang & Yu Chen & Zhongchang Sun & Zhenci Xu & Rui Zhu & Michael E. Meadows & Guonian Lü, 2023. "Spatio-temporal changes in the causal interactions among Sustainable Development Goals in China," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy
    • C44 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Operations Research; Statistical Decision Theory
    • C02 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General - - - Mathematical Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:28:y:2026:i:72:p:789. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valentin Dumitru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.