Author
Abstract
Achieving quality education is a fundamental pillar of sustainable development, as outlined in the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 4 (SDG 4). This study evaluates and ranks the performance of the Baltic States Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania regarding their progress toward quality education in the context of sustainability. Drawing on seven key Eurostat indicators, the research applies the Complex Proportional Assessment (COPRAS) method, a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) approach, to construct a composite index for each country. The selected indicators encompass various dimensions of education, including early school leaving, tertiary educational attainment, early childhood participation, low academic achievement, adult learning, and digital skills. The results show that Lithuania ranks highest overall, particularly excelling in formal education indicators such as tertiary attainment and early childhood education. Estonia demonstrates strong performance in digital literacy, adult participation in learning, and minimizing academic underachievement. Latvia shows moderate performance across most dimensions but requires more targeted policy efforts in digital and lifelong learning domains. The study fills a critical gap in the literature by providing a data-driven, comparative evaluation of education sustainability in the Baltic region. It offers practical insights for policymakers to enhance educational strategies and align national systems with the broader goals of sustainable development. Future research could expand this framework to other EU regions or incorporate qualitative metrics for a more comprehensive assessment.
Suggested Citation
Dalia Streimikiene & Ahmad Bathaei, 2025.
"Evaluating and ranking quality education for sustainable development in the Baltic States: A multi-criteria decision-making approach using Eurostat data,"
Transformations and Sustainability, Centre for Productivity and Sustainability Analysis, vol. 1(1), pages 12-29.
Handle:
RePEc:dbj:trasus:v:1:y:2025:i:1:p:12-29
DOI: 10.63775/vq29r460
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dbj:trasus:v:1:y:2025:i:1:p:12-29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tomas Balezentis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cpsa.lt/ts/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.