IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/amfeco/v11y2009i26p616-624.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost Analysis of Good Practice – a Case Study for Dentistry Services in Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Dutescu Adriana

    () (The Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, Romania)

  • Ponorîca Andreea Gabriela

    () (The Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, Romania)

  • Stanila Georgiana Oana

Abstract

The vital decisions of the enterprise are connected to knowing the costs, their structure and characteristics. From this perspective, one can say that, by classifying costs, we can rapidly choose those costs that correspond to the specific needs of information. From the good practice spectrum, the medical research is expected to continue producing a high number of alternatives to detect, prevent and treat different affections. There is a wide set of theories, techniques and instruments for the allocation of expenses through the so called allocation keys. In completion of this practice, management accounting involves the allocation of costs among responsibilities centers, in order to predict the effects of the decisions taken into management, the computation of tariffs, motivation of employees, assets evaluation and income determination, opportunity costs estimation. This study refers to allocation of resources in a systematic manner and not an intuitive one.

Suggested Citation

  • Dutescu Adriana & Ponorîca Andreea Gabriela & Stanila Georgiana Oana, 2009. "Cost Analysis of Good Practice – a Case Study for Dentistry Services in Romania," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 11(26), pages 616-623, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:11:y:2009:i:26:p:616-624
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro/temp/Article_903.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Weinstein, Milton & Zeckhauser, Richard, 1973. "Critical ratios and efficient allocation," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 2(2), pages 147-157, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    efficiency; cost; budget; analysis; benefit; good practice;

    JEL classification:

    • I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets
    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:11:y:2009:i:26:p:616-624. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Valentin Dumitru). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.