IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aen/journl/2010v31-03-a06.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Feedback by Text Message (SMS) and Email on Household Electricity Consumption: Experimental Evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Gleerup
  • Anders Larsen
  • Soren Leth-Petersen
  • Mikael Togeby

Abstract

This paper analyzes the effect of supplying feedback by text messages (SMS) and email about electricity consumption on the level of total household electricity consumption. An experiment was conducted in which 1,452 households were randomly allocated to three experimental groups and two control groups. Feedback was supplied throughout 2007 to members of the experiment groups who accepted the invitation, and data on consumption of electricity for 2006 and 2007 collected for all participants and control group members. 30% of the households invited to receive feedback accepted the invitation. Results suggest that email and SMS messaging that communicated timely information about a householdÕs ÔexceptionalÕ consumption periods (e.g. highest week of electricity use in past quarter) produced average reductions in total annual electricity use of about 3%. The feedback technology is cheap to implement and therefore likely to be cost-effective.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Gleerup & Anders Larsen & Soren Leth-Petersen & Mikael Togeby, 2010. "The Effect of Feedback by Text Message (SMS) and Email on Household Electricity Consumption: Experimental Evidence," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 3), pages 113-132.
  • Handle: RePEc:aen:journl:2010v31-03-a06
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.iaee.org/en/publications/ejarticle.aspx?id=2389
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to IAEE members and subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Schleich, Joachim & Gassmann, Xavier & Faure, Corinne & Meissner, Thomas, 2016. "Making the implicit explicit: A look inside the implicit discount rate," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 321-331.
    2. Iwafune, Yumiko & Mori, Yuko & Kawai, Toshiaki & Yagita, Yoshie, 2017. "Energy-saving effect of automatic home energy report utilizing home energy management system data in Japan," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 382-392.
    3. Nicolas Astier, 2016. "Comparative Feedbacks under Incomplete Information," Working Papers hal-01465189, HAL.
    4. Rosenkranz, Stephanie & Vringer, Kees & Dirkmaat, Thomas & van den Broek, Eva & Abeelen, Christiaan & Travaille, Anjo, 2017. "Using behavioral insights to make firms more energy efficient: A field experiment on the effects of improved communication," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 184-193.
    5. Maya Papineau & Nicholas Rivers, "undated". "Visualizing Energy Efficiency: A Picture is Worth More Than 1,022 Words," Carleton Economic Papers 19-10, Carleton University, Department of Economics.
    6. Schleich, Joachim & Faure, Corinne & Klobasa, Marian, 2017. "Persistence of the effects of providing feedback alongside smart metering devices on household electricity demand," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 225-233.
    7. Paolo Zangheri & Tiago Serrenho & Paolo Bertoldi, 2019. "Energy Savings from Feedback Systems: A Meta-Studies’ Review," Energies, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 12(19), pages 1-18, October.
    8. Buckley, Penelope, 2020. "Prices, information and nudges for residential electricity conservation: A meta-analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    9. Peter John & Jane Robb, 2017. "Using behavioural insights for citizen compliance and cooperation," Evidence Base, Australia and New Zealand School of Government, vol. 2017(1), pages 1-1, March.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • F0 - International Economics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aen:journl:2010v31-03-a06. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (David Williams). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/iaeeeea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.