IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adf/journl/y2024id1804.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coordination of Actions Between Universities and Business: Development of a Data-Centric Interaction Tool

Author

Listed:
  • O. V. Milekhinaa

  • A. V. Aslanova

  • E. E. Sirik

Abstract

This paper discusses issues related to the coordination of actions between universities and employers. Despite their interdependence in the process of preparing qualified personnel, the primary instrument of interaction remains observation, which typically does not involve the integration of interaction subjects and maintains sporadic communication during the implementation of educational programs. Enhancing the effectiveness of interaction between universities and businesses requires a corresponding tool for direct coordination of actions. The aim of this study is to develop a tool for assessing the systemic balance of the educational program curriculum to shape the competencies required by businesses. Achieving this goal required solving the following tasks: 1) to localize the mechanisms of coordination between universities and analyze approaches to their implementation; 2) to develop an algorithm for calculating the index of systemic balance of the curriculum; 3) to test the algorithm on real data and propose scenarios for improving educational programs. The ecosystem theory of G. B. Kleiner was adopted as the methodological basis. Among the main results of the study is the development of an algorithm for calculating the index of systemic balance of curricula based on a corresponding metric model. Data-centric improvement of curricula in the context of ecosystem theory allows for a rational combination of fundamental and practical training, ensures interdisciplinary solutions to professional tasks, flexibility in applying competencies for the benefit of innovative business and regional economic development, technological and personnel sovereignty of the country.

Suggested Citation

  • O. V. Milekhinaa & A. V. Aslanova & E. E. Sirik, 2024. "Coordination of Actions Between Universities and Business: Development of a Data-Centric Interaction Tool," University Management: Practice and Analysis, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education «Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N.Yeltsin»; Non-Commercial Partnership “University Management: Practice and, vol. 28(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:adf:journl:y:2024:id:1804
    DOI: 10.15826/umpa.2024.01.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.umj.ru/jour/article/viewFile/1804/1213
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15826/umpa.2024.01.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jon I Martinez & J Carlos Jarillo, 1989. "The Evolution of Research on Coordination Mechanisms in Multinational Corporations," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 20(3), pages 489-514, September.
    2. V. P. Solovyov & T. A. Pereskokova, 2022. "Prospects of standardization of professional education," Russian Journal of Industrial Economics, MISIS, vol. 15(1).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Asmund Rygh & Gabriel R. G. Benito, 2018. "Capital Structure of Foreign Direct Investments: A Transaction Cost Analysis," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 58(3), pages 389-411, June.
    2. Jensen, Peter D. Ørberg & Larsen, Marcus M. & Pedersen, Torben, 2013. "The organizational design of offshoring: Taking stock and moving forward," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 315-323.
    3. Alarik, Björn, 2000. "From M-form to N-form: The Structure of Multinational Corporations," FE rapport 2000-378, University of Gothenburg, Department of Business Administration.
    4. repec:dau:papers:123456789/2093 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Leena Pekkinen & Kirsi Aaltonen & Jaakko Kujala & Janne Härkönen, 2015. "Evaluating Sources of Risks in Large Engineering Projects: The Roles of Equivocality and Uncertainty," International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, ToKnowPress, vol. 4(2), pages 163-180.
    6. K. Skylar Powell & Eunah Lim & Naoki Ando, 2021. "Seeing the tree and the forest: Japanese auto firm multinational dispersion, cultural distance, and foreign manufacturing subsidiary ownership levels," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(2), pages 163-187, April.
    7. Elodie Gardet & Caroline Danièle Mothe, 2011. "The dynamics of coordination in innovation networks," Post-Print hal-00919245, HAL.
    8. Zander, Ivo, 1998. "The evolution of technological capabilities in the multinational corporation--dispersion, duplication and potential advantages from multinationality," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 17-35, May.
    9. Paik, Yongsun & Sohn, Junghoon Derick, 2004. "Expatriate managers and MNC's ability to control international subsidiaries: the case of Japanese MNCs," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 61-71, February.
    10. Justin J. P. Jansen & Michiel P. Tempelaar & Frans A. J. van den Bosch & Henk W. Volberda, 2009. "Structural Differentiation and Ambidexterity: The Mediating Role of Integration Mechanisms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 797-811, August.
    11. Ambos, Björn & Kunisch, Sven & Leicht-Deobald, Ulrich & Schulte Steinberg, Adrian, 2019. "Unravelling agency relations inside the MNC: The roles of socialization, goal conflicts and second principals in headquarters-subsidiary relationships," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 67-81.
    12. Mehdi Nekhili & Dhikra Chebbi Nekhili & Walid Cheffi, 2009. "Headquarters’ Control Capacity and the Choice of R&D Organizational Forms Abroad," Working Papers CREGO 1090503, Université de Bourgogne - CREGO EA7317 Centre de recherches en gestion des organisations.
    13. Krane, Ronja & Eulerich, Marc, 2020. "Going global: Factors influencing the internationalization of the internal audit function," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    14. Maximilian Palmié & Marco Zeschky & Stephan Winterhalter & Philipp Walter Sauter & Naomi Haefner & Oliver Gassmann, 2016. "Coordination mechanisms for international innovation in SMEs: effects on time-to-market and R&D task complexity as a moderator," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 273-294, February.
    15. Asakawa, Kazuhiro, 2001. "Organizational tension in international R&D management: the case of Japanese firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 735-757, May.
    16. Barron, Andrew & Pereda, Asier & Stacey, Stephen, 2017. "Exploring the performance of government affairs subsidiaries: A study of organisation design and the social capital of European government affairs managers at Toyota Motor Europe and Hyundai Motor Com," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 184-196.
    17. Barrett, Michael & Cooper, David J. & Jamal, Karim, 2005. "Globalization and the coordinating of work in multinational audits," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 1-24, January.
    18. Patrick Regnér & Udo Zander, 2011. "Knowledge and Strategy Creation in Multinational Companies," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 51(6), pages 821-850, December.
    19. Andersson, Ulf, 1999. "Some notes on subsidiary network embeddedness and its effects on the multinational corporation," Working Papers 1999:3, Uppsala University, Department of Business Studies.
    20. Andersson, Ulf & Forsgren, Mats, 1996. "Subsidiary embeddedness and control in the multinational corporation," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 5(5), pages 487-508, October.
    21. Zhongjuan Sun & Jialin Feng & Yikai Yuan & Jiamu Sun, 2025. "How does parent firms' ESG disclosure affect overseas subsidiary financial performance? The case of Chinese multinationals," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(1), pages 128-165, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adf:journl:y:2024:id:1804. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ð ÐµÐ´Ð°ÐºÑ†Ð¸Ñ (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.