IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ack/journl/y2026id1129.html

Classification of the trends in modern economic theory: paradigmatic aspects of the problem analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Vitaly V. Biryukov

Abstract

The article considers the problem of classifying the directions of economic theory related to understanding the historical logic and prospects for the development of mainstream and unorthodox research. In line with the theory of T. Kun and the concept of I. Lakatos, the author shows that these studies are mainly developed within the framework of the general paradigm. Its nucleus acts in the form of “homo economicus†, and the periphery in the form of various institutional interpretations. In the mainstream program society is not considered by a real actor, therefore, an institutionalinstrumental approach is applied, within the framework of which economic descriptions are created on the basis of the liberal concept of a bunch of property rights, which ensures the priority of private interests. In unorthodox program society acts as a real actor and uses a valueinstitutional approach, according to which the economy is analyzed from the standpoint of the social concept of a bunch of property rights and understanding of society as a supreme owner. The author substantiates the statement that the classics of political economy proposed a cognitive paradigm, which, unlike the traditional paradigm, allows us to study the endogenous processes of economic development based on the dual nature of the economic interests of subjects and the classical concept of property. In the classical paradigm, taking into account the ideas of Aristotle and medieval thinkers, public property is understood as a complex-structure phenomenon, acting as a historical and logical basis for the analysis of various forms of property and economic systems of traditional and modern societies. The classical perspective focuses on creating the adequate realities of the sovereign model of the Russian economy based on a change in the outdated architecture of property relations and economic relations in accordance with the priority of the interests of society.

Suggested Citation

  • Vitaly V. Biryukov, 2026. "Classification of the trends in modern economic theory: paradigmatic aspects of the problem analysis," Economics of Contemporary Russia, Regional Public Organization for Assistance to the Development of Institutions of the Department of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 29(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:ack:journl:y:2026:id:1129
    DOI: 10.33293/1609-1442-2026-29(1)-5-14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ecr-journal.ru/jour/article/viewFile/1129/658
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.33293/1609-1442-2026-29(1)-5-14?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gindis, David & Hodgson, Geoffrey M. & Huang, Kainan & Pistor, Katharina, 2017. "Legal institutionalism: Capitalism and the constitutive role of lawAuthor-Name: Deakin, Simon," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 188-200.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meina Cai & Ilia Murtazashvili & Jennifer Murtazashvili & Raufhon Salahodjaev, 2020. "Individualism and governance of the commons," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 184(1), pages 175-195, July.
    2. Dennis Ridley, 2021. "Capitalism/Democracy/Rule of Law Interactions and Implications for Entrepreneurship and Per Capita Real Gross Domestic Product Adjusted for Purchasing Power Parity," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(1), pages 384-411, March.
    3. David Gindis & Abraham A. Singer, 2023. "The Corporate Baby in the Bathwater: Why Proposals to Abolish Corporate Personhood Are Misguided," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(4), pages 983-997, April.
    4. Lissowska, Maria, . "Crowdfunding - zjawisko, problemy, regulacja," Gospodarka Narodowa-The Polish Journal of Economics, Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie / SGH Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 2018(1).
    5. Laplane, Andrea & Mazzucato, Mariana, 2020. "Socializing the risks and rewards of public investments: Economic, policy, and legal issues," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(S).
    6. Gerhard Schnyder & Centre for Business Research, 2018. "Investigating New Types of 'Decoupling': Minority Shareholder Protection in the Law & Corporate Practice," Working Papers wp502, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    7. Santiago Mejia & Pietro Bonaldi, 2025. "Maximizing Shareholder Welfare: A Normative Examination of Hart and Zingales’ Corporate Governance Account," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 196(2), pages 309-323, January.
    8. Blanche Segrestin & Armand Hatchuel & Kevin Levillain, 2021. "When the Law Distinguishes Between the Enterprise and the Corporation: The Case of the New French Law on Corporate Purpose," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 171(1), pages 1-13, June.
    9. Jiakun Huo & Yashu Zhao, 2025. "Bridging the legal divide: evaluating stakeholder awareness, regulatory effectiveness, and governance gaps in sustainable development across urban and rural China," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    10. Finnegan David L., 2018. "Demand for Law in the African Private Sector," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 11(2), pages 333-369, December.
    11. Massimiliano Vatiero, 2021. "Transaction and transactors’ choices: What we have learned and what we need to explore," DEM Working Papers 2021/04, Department of Economics and Management.
    12. Cai, Meina & Murtazashvili, Ilia & Murtazashvili, Jennifer, 2020. "The politics of land property rights," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(2), pages 151-167, April.
    13. Angela Ambrosino & Paolo Silvestri, 2020. "Hodgson: An Institution Across Disciplinary Barriers," Annals of the Fondazione Luigi Einaudi. An Interdisciplinary Journal of Economics, History and Political Science, Fondazione Luigi Einaudi, Torino (Italy), vol. 54(2), pages 329-348, December.
    14. Panayotis Kapopoulos & Anastasios Rizos, 2024. "Judicial efficiency and economic growth: Evidence based on European Union data," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 71(1), pages 101-131, February.
    15. Steffen Roth & Vladislav Valentinov, 2023. "Toward a theory of multifunctional liberalism: Systems‐theoretical reflections on the nature of statehood," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(6), pages 945-954, November.
    16. Simon Deakin & Kamelia Pourkermani, 2026. "The Effects of Labour Laws on Productivity, Employment, Unemployment and the Labour Share of National Income: Analysis of New Evidence from the Cambridge Leximetric Database, with a UK-China Comparison," Working Papers wp547, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    17. Zi Yang, 2022. "GameStop or Game Just Started? Leveling the Playing Field for Social Media Meme Investors to Rebuild the Public’s Trust," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-13, December.
    18. Thomas Amossé & Alex Bryson & John Forth & Héloïse Petit, 2025. "The micro‐foundations of employment systems: An empirical case study of Britain and France," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 63(1), pages 3-29, March.
    19. Blanche Segrestin & Armand Hatchuel & Kevin Levillain, 2020. "When the law distinguishes between the enterprise and the corporation: the case of the new French law on corporate purpose," Post-Print hal-02441287, HAL.
    20. Blanche Segrestin & Armand Hatchuel & Kevin Levillain, 2021. "When the Law Distinguishes Between the Enterprise and the Corporation: The Case of the New French Law on Corporate Purpose," Post-Print hal-02465609, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ack:journl:y:2026:id:1129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ð ÐµÐ´Ð°ÐºÑ†Ð¸Ñ (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.