IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/acf/journl/y2026id2868.html

Model of Stakeholder Interaction in Strategizing the High-Tech Industry in the Region (Case of the Coal Chemical Industry of the Kemerovo Region — Kuzbass)

Author

Listed:
  • D. L. Loginov

Abstract

This article examines one of the important components of the strategic development of the coal chemical industry in the Kemerovo Region — Kuzbass: the development of a model of interaction between stakeholders with different goals. It is proposed to use the methodology of co-construction/cocurrence, where the relations of the parties are more complex compared to competition or cooperation.The aim is development of a model of stakeholder interaction using the principles of coconstruction/cocurrency in strategizing the development of the coal chemical industry in the Kemerovo region — Kuzbass.Methods. The study is based on the theory of strategy, the methodology of strategizing by Academician V. L. Kvint, the theory of competition and cooperation by A. Brandenburger, B. Nalebuff. A systemic-structural approach, logical general scientific methods of classification, induction, deduction, abstraction, and systematization is used.Results. A model of interaction with stakeholders in strategizing the coal chemical industry of the Kemerovo Region — Kuzbass has been developed, which differs from known approaches by the use of principles and mechanisms of strategic co-construction/ cocurrence in conditions of competition in markets of different levels. Specific principles of strategic co-construction/ cocurrence have been proposed, including evidence, dynamism, and balance of interests, integration, openness, and compliance with economic security. Mechanisms of interaction between stakeholders have been defined.Conclusions. The proposed model of interaction with stakeholders using the principles and mechanisms of strategic co-construction/cocurrence in the conditions of tough global and national competition will significantly increase the likelihood of successful implementation of the strategy for the creation and development of the coal chemical industry in the Kemerovo region — Kuzbass with access to the world level.

Suggested Citation

  • D. L. Loginov, 2026. "Model of Stakeholder Interaction in Strategizing the High-Tech Industry in the Region (Case of the Coal Chemical Industry of the Kemerovo Region — Kuzbass)," Administrative Consulting, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. North-West Institute of Management., issue 6.
    • Handle: RePEc:acf:journl:y:2026:id:2868
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/viewFile/2868/2099
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William J. Baumol, 2013. "The Microtheory of Innovative Entrepreneurship," Journal of Economic Sociology, National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 14(3), pages 96-108.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pies, Ingo, 2011. "Wachstum durch Wissen: Lektionen der neueren Welt(wirtschafts)geschichte," Discussion Papers 2011-5, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    2. Bakyt Beknazarov & Roza Niyazbekova & Ussen Amirseitov & Aiganym Kokenova & Marzhan Daurbayeva & Madina Aitkazina, 2020. "Development of entrepreneurship and forms of self-employment in the innovative sectors of the economy," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(2), pages 209-228, December.
    3. Matthew R. Marvel & G. T. Lumpkin, 2017. "Domain Learning and Opportunity Development in a High-Tech Context," Journal of Enterprising Culture (JEC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 25(01), pages 67-96, March.
    4. Pies Ingo, 2012. "Wachstum durch Wissen: Lektionen der neueren Welt(wirtschafts)- geschichte," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 63(1), pages 520-523, January.
    5. Colin David Reddy, 2024. "Nations’ share of innovative entrepreneurs: financial systems to the rescue in difficult institutional settings," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Francesco Quatraro & Marco Vivarelli, 2015. "Drivers of Entrepreneurship and Post-entry Performance of Newborn Firms in Developing Countries," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 30(2), pages 277-305.
    7. Petrick, Martin, 2010. "Zur Institutionellen Steuerbarkeit Von Produktivem Unternehmertum Im Transformationsprozess Russlands," IAMO Discussion Papers 94721, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    8. Yoon, Hyungseok & Tashman, Peter & Benischke, Mirko H. & Doh, Jonathan & Kim, Namil, 2024. "Climate impact, institutional context, and national climate change adaptation IP protection rates," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 39(1).
    9. Felix Carl Schultz & Ingo Pies, 2024. "The circular economy growth machine: A critical perspective on “post‐growth” and “pro‐growth” circularity approaches," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(1), pages 17-24, February.
    10. Salisu Isyaku, 2014. "Mediating Effect of Uncertainty Avoidance on the Relationship between Entrepreneurial Talent and SMEs Performance in Nigeria: A Conceptual Analysis," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 4(6), pages 368-383, June.
    11. Mark Griffiths & Jill Kickul & Sophie Bacq & Siri Terjesen, 2012. "A Dialogue with William J. Baumol: Insights on Entrepreneurship Theory and Education," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 36(4), pages 611-625, July.
    12. Marcus Box & Karl Gratzer & Xiang Lin, 2020. "Destructive entrepreneurship in the small business sector: bankruptcy fraud in Sweden, 1830–2010," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 437-457, February.
    13. Zoi Pittaki, 2020. "Extending William Baumol’s theory on entrepreneurship and institutions: lessons from post-Second World War Greece," Business History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(2), pages 343-363, February.
    14. Schweinberger, A.G. & Woodland, A.D., 2015. "Entrepreneurship and conflict generating product price changes," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 158-174.
    15. Magnus Henrekson & Tino Sanandaji, 2020. "Measuring Entrepreneurship: Do Established Metrics Capture Schumpeterian Entrepreneurship?," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 44(4), pages 733-760, July.
    16. Hielscher, Stefan & Pies, Ingo & Prinz, Aloys, 2015. "Umfassende Organisationsethik für die moderne Gesellschaft: Ein systematischer Vergleich gewinnorientierter und nicht-gewinnorientierter Unternehmen," Discussion Papers 2015-8, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    17. Elert, Niklas & Henrekson, Magnus, 2017. "Entrepreneurship and Institutions: A Bidirectional Relationship," Working Paper Series 1153, Research Institute of Industrial Economics, revised 05 May 2017.
    18. Edquist, Charles & Laatsit, Mart, 2022. "From the Systems of Innovation Approach to a General Theory of Innovation: Do Activities and Functions Reflect what Happens in Innovation Systems?," Papers in Innovation Studies 2022/7, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    19. Marco Vivarelli, 2014. "The Middle Income Trap: A Way Out Based on Technological and Structural Change," DISCE - Quaderni del Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali dises1403, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimenti e Istituti di Scienze Economiche (DISCE).
    20. Alessandra Colombelli & Jackie Krafft & Marco Vivarelli, 2016. "Entrepreneurship and Innovation: New Entries, Survival, Growth," GREDEG Working Papers 2016-04, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:acf:journl:y:2026:id:2868. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://sziu.ranepa.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.