IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/acf/journl/y2022id1869.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Elections for the Authorities, Elections for Citizens

Author

Listed:
  • N. V. Perevyshin

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to study elections from the perspective of the motivation of society’s participation in them. The interests of professional political subjects and the people are differentiated.A comparative analysis of a number of models of democracy is carried out from the position of their correspondence to reality. The elite model of democracy is taken as a basis for further research. The author’s approach to democracy as one of the means of hybrid management of society as opposed to the division of states into democratic and nondemocratic is described.Elections to state authorities and elections to local self-government bodies are differentiated based on differences in the motivation of voters to participate in them.An electoral model is proposed that includes elections as an advisory mechanism (elections for the authorities) and elections as a mechanism of public representation and self-government (elections for citizens).

Suggested Citation

  • N. V. Perevyshin, 2022. "Elections for the Authorities, Elections for Citizens," Administrative Consulting, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. North-West Institute of Management., issue 1.
    • Handle: RePEc:acf:journl:y:2022:id:1869
    DOI: 10.22394/1726-1139-2022-1-35-46
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/viewFile/1869/1532
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22394/1726-1139-2022-1-35-46?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Easton, David, 1975. "A Re-assessment of the Concept of Political Support," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(4), pages 435-457, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jorge Benedicto & María Ramos, 2018. "Young People’s Critical Politicization in Spain in the Great Recession: A Generational Reconfiguration?," Societies, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-30, September.
    2. Delhey, Jan & Tobsch, Verena, 2000. "Understanding regime support in new democracies: does politics really matter more than economics?," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Social Structure and Social Reporting FS III 00-403, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    3. Hajo G. Boomgaarden & Andreas R. T. Schuck & Matthijs Elenbaas & Claes H. de Vreese, 2011. "Mapping EU attitudes: Conceptual and empirical dimensions of Euroscepticism and EU support," European Union Politics, , vol. 12(2), pages 241-266, June.
    4. Julian Aichholzer & Sylvia Kritzinger & Carolina Plescia, 2021. "National identity profiles and support for the European Union," European Union Politics, , vol. 22(2), pages 293-315, June.
    5. Maité Laméris & Pierre-Guillaume Méon & Anne-Marie Van Prooijen, 2019. "What have we done? The impact of choosing and studying different academic disciplines on beliefs and values," Working Papers CEB 19-007, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    6. Lourdes Rojas Rubio, 2022. "Political Culture and Democratisation," THEMA Working Papers 2022-17, THEMA (THéorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
    7. Yanbo Zhang & Yibao Wang & Ahmad Bayiz Ahmad & Ashfaq Ahmad Shah & Wen Qing, 2021. "How Do Individual-Level Characteristics Influence Cross-Domain Risk Perceptions Among Chinese Urban Residents?," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, April.
    8. Nicholas Clark & Robert Rohrschneider, 2021. "Tracing the development of nationalist attitudes in the EU," European Union Politics, , vol. 22(2), pages 181-201, June.
    9. Lourdes ROJAS RUBIO, 2022. "Inequality, Corruption and Support for Democracy," THEMA Working Papers 2022-20, THEMA (THéorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
    10. Nomikos, William George, 2021. "More Security, More Legitimacy? Effective Governance as a Source of State Legitimacy in Liberia," OSF Preprints hd28z, Center for Open Science.
    11. Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, 2018. "The Impact of the Global Economic Crisis on Patterns of Support for Democracy in Germany," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 43(4), pages 203-234.
    12. Fuchs, Dieter, 1998. "The political culture of unified Germany," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Institutions and Social Change FS III 98-204, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    13. Henry Rammelt, 2011. "Strengthening ties between social capital, social movement and political culture. An integrative approach to social movements in countries with recent regime change," Journal of Community Positive Practices, Catalactica NGO, issue 3, pages 128-138.
    14. Fuchs, Dieter, 1993. "A metatheory of the democratic process," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Institutions and Social Change FS III 93-203, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    15. Leon Kanthak & Dennis C Spies, 2018. "Public support for European Union economic policies," European Union Politics, , vol. 19(1), pages 97-118, March.
    16. Mario Quaranta & Sergio Martini, 2017. "Easy Come, Easy Go? Economic Performance and Satisfaction with Democracy in Southern Europe in the Last Three Decades," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 131(2), pages 659-680, March.
    17. repec:gig:joupla:v:4:y:2012:i:2:p:89-123 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Jonas Tallberg & Soetkin Verhaegen, 2020. "The Legitimacy of International Institutions among Rising and Established Powers," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(S3), pages 115-126, October.
    19. Luisa Blanco, 2012. "The Impact of Insecurity on Democracy and Trust in Institutions in Mexico," Working Papers WR-940, RAND Corporation.
    20. Friedrich Schneider & Alexander F. Wagner & Mathias Dufour, 2003. "Satisfaction not guaranteed-Institutions and satisfaction with democracy in Western Europe," Economics working papers 2003-03, Department of Economics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria.
    21. Yegor Lazarev & Anton Sobolev & Irina Soboleva & Boris Sokolov, 2012. "Trial by Fire: a Natural Disaster’s Impact on Attitudes toward the Government in Rural Russia," HSE Working papers WP BRP 04/PS/2012, National Research University Higher School of Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:acf:journl:y:2022:id:1869. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://sziu.ranepa.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.