IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abg/anprac/v23y2019i51360.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interorganizational Relationships in the Amazon Biotech Industry Based on Entrepreneurs´ Perceptions

Author

Listed:
  • Rosana Zau Mafra
  • Dimas José Lasmar
  • Dalton Chaves Vilela Júnior

Abstract

The process of industrial restructuring has adopted different types of relationships in order to guarantee the organizations survival and development. Bioindustry requires high technical-scientific investments that are obtained through partnerships. These collaborative relationships, however, have been challenging in Brazil. In the Amazon context, where value adding in the use of biodiversity resources bears high importance for regional sustainable development, studies point to difficulties of interaction between bioindustry firms, university, and government. Against this backdrop, this research analyzes the perception of entrepreneurs operating in the Amazon bioindustry regarding the inter-organizational relationships. Qualitative research was carried out with thirteen firms, collecting data based on network pictures, complemented with semi-structured interviews. The study identified that attributes such as friendship and trust are primary factors in the relationships, and that the complementarity of resources is the main reason to establish partnerships. However, the findings suggest that inter and intra-sectorial relationships in this Amazon bioindustry are far behind what is recommended in literature to affirm the existence of a business network. Therefore, the study points out the need for strategic actions to approximate these actors in bioindustry.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosana Zau Mafra & Dimas José Lasmar & Dalton Chaves Vilela Júnior, 2019. "Interorganizational Relationships in the Amazon Biotech Industry Based on Entrepreneurs´ Perceptions," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 23(5), pages 672-695.
    • Handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:23:y:2019:i:5:1360
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/1360/1407
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/download/1360/1407
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Valtteri Kaartemo & Hannu Makkonen & Rami Olkkonen, 2015. "The potential of network pictures for international alliance and network research," Chapters, in: Handbook on International Alliance and Network Research, chapter 9, pages 229-242, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Viaggi, Davide, 2018. "Towards an economics of the bioeconomy: four years later," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 5(2), September.
    3. Wilkinson, Ian & Young, Louise, 2002. "On cooperating: firms, relations and networks," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 123-132, February.
    4. Kamuriwo, Dzidziso Samuel & Baden-Fuller, Charles, 2016. "Knowledge integration using product R&D outsourcing in biotechnology," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(5), pages 1031-1045.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carolina Rojas-Córdova & Amanda J. Williamson & Julio A. Pertuze & Gustavo Calvo, 2023. "Why one strategy does not fit all: a systematic review on exploration–exploitation in different organizational archetypes," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(7), pages 2251-2295, October.
    2. Jarratt, Denise & Ceric, Arnela, 2015. "The complexity of trust in business collaborations," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 2-12.
    3. Olena Gudz & Nataliya Prokopenko, 2018. "The Increase Of Enterprises' Innovative Development Based On The Network Approach," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 4(1).
    4. Simba, Amon & Wang, Yan & del Olmo García, Francisco, 2023. "Deconstructing self-organisation in microentrepreneurship: A social embeddedness perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    5. Figueiredo, Paulo N. & Larsen, Henrik & Hansen, Ulrich E., 2020. "The role of interactive learning in innovation capability building in multinational subsidiaries: A micro-level study of biotechnology in Brazil," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(6).
    6. Chou, Hsin-Hui & Zolkiewski, Judy, 2012. "Managing resource interaction as a means to cope with technological change," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 188-195.
    7. Leonard Prochaska & Daniel Schiller, 2021. "An evolutionary perspective on the emergence and implementation of mission-oriented innovation policy: the example of the change of the leitmotif from biotechnology to bioeconomy," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 141-249, April.
    8. Hong Liu & Zhihua Liu & Yongzeng Lai & Lin Li, 2021. "Factors Influencing Collaborative Innovation Project Performance: The Case of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-19, July.
    9. Manser, Kristina & Hillebrand, Bas & Driessen, Paul H. & Ziggers, Gerrit Willem & Bloemer, Josée M.M., 2015. "Activity sets in multi-organizational ecologies: a project-level perspective on sustainable energy innovations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 90(PB), pages 444-455.
    10. Ballantyne, David & Williams, John, 2008. "Business to business relationships: the paradox of network constraints?," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 95-107.
    11. Smol, Marzena & Kulczycka, Joanna, 2019. "Towards innovations development in the European raw material sector by evolution of the knowledge triangle," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 453-462.
    12. Roger Schweizer, 2013. "SMEs and networks: Overcoming the liability of outsidership," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 80-103, March.
    13. Therese Bennich & Salim Belyazid, 2017. "The Route to Sustainability—Prospects and Challenges of the Bio-Based Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-18, May.
    14. Fredin, Sabrina, 2012. "The Dynamics and Evolution of Local Industries – The case of Linköping," Papers in Innovation Studies 2012/7, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    15. Sascha Kraus & Fabian Meier & Thomas Niemand & Ricarda B. Bouncken & Paavo Ritala, 2018. "In search for the ideal coopetition partner: an experimental study," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 1025-1053, October.
    16. Therese Bennich & Salim Belyazid & Birgit Kopainsky & Arnaud Diemer, 2018. "Understanding the Transition to a Bio-Based Economy: Exploring Dynamics Linked to the Agricultural Sector in Sweden," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-22, May.
    17. Li, Gang & Yang, Hongjiao & Sun, Linyan & Ji, Ping & Feng, Lei, 2010. "The evolutionary complexity of complex adaptive supply networks: A simulation and case study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 310-330, April.
    18. Erik Hofmann & Yannick Sertori, 2020. "Financial Spillover Effects in Supply Chains: Do Customers and Suppliers Really Benefit?," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-27, March.
    19. Joanna Wiśniewska-Paluszak, 2017. "Koncepcja sieci w badaniach zrównoważonego rozwoju agrobiznesu," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 1, pages 119-145.
    20. Thierry Isckia & Denis Lescop, 2008. "Open innovation within business ecosystems : lessons from Amazon.com," Post-Print hal-02507841, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:23:y:2019:i:5:1360. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Information Technology of ANPAD (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://anpad.org.br .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.