IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/vua/wpaper/1995-20.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Factors affecting the success of management support systems: analysis and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Gelderman, M.

    (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Econometrie (Free University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics Sciences, Business Administration and Economitrics)

Abstract

This paper gives a traditional review and meta-analysis of the literature on management support systems (MSS) success. Based on an extensive survey of published research in the problem domain factors, affecting MSS success as presented. Both a theoretical examination and an overview of empirical research of each factor are provided. Correlations above r = 0.3 are found for user maturity of IS department, flexibility, realism of user expectations quality of user documentation, formal development, user training, management support, and user expectations. Thus far, user involvement is the most widely investigated variable in empirical research. In this paper, the author makes an attempt to distinguish objective user involvement from user involvement as experienced by the user. Effect sizes for the latter variable appeared to be larger than findings for the first. Indicating that a 'feeling' of user involvement is more important than user involvement itself. A further analysis of the data shows effect sizes for laboratory studies to be lower, and more homogeneous than findings of field research. Furthermore, correlation between the contingency factors and user information satisfaction appeared to be higher than findings which used usage as the independent variable. The relation between the contingency factors and usage appears to be diminishing over time. This may be caused by the fact that MSS less often fall below the level at which managers cease to use the systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Gelderman, M., 1995. "Factors affecting the success of management support systems: analysis and meta-analysis," Serie Research Memoranda 0020, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    • Handle: RePEc:vua:wpaper:1995-20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://degree.ubvu.vu.nl/repec/vua/wpaper/pdf/19950020.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ewusi-Mensah, Kweku, 1981. "The external organizational environment and its impact on management information systems," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 6(4), pages 301-316, October.
    2. Gordon, Lawrence A. & Miller, Danny, 1976. "A contingency framework for the design of accounting information systems," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 59-69, January.
    3. M. L. Bariff & E. J. Lusk, 1977. "Cognitive and Personality Tests for the Design of Management Information Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(8), pages 820-829, April.
    4. Bert Debrabander & Anders Edström, 1977. "Successful Information System Development Projects," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 191-199, October.
    5. B. De Brabander & G. Thiers, 1984. "Successful Information System Development in Relation to Situational Factors Which Affect Effective Communication Between MIS-Users and EDP-Specialists," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(2), pages 137-155, February.
    6. Ginzberg, Michael J., 1980. "An organizational contingencies view of accounting and information systems implementation," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 5(4), pages 369-382, October.
    7. Arkalgud Ramaprasad, 1987. "Cognitive Process as a Basis for MIS and DSS Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 139-148, February.
    8. Blake Ives & Scott Hamilton & Gordon B. Davis, 1980. "A Framework for Research in Computer-Based Management Information Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(9), pages 910-934, September.
    9. Benbasat, I & Dexter, As, 1982. "Individual-Differences In The Use Of Decision Support Aids," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(1), pages 1-11.
    10. Robert W. Zmud, 1979. "Individual Differences and MIS Success: A Review of the Empirical Literature," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(10), pages 966-979, October.
    11. Blake Ives & Margrethe H. Olson, 1984. "User Involvement and MIS Success: A Review of Research," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(5), pages 586-603, May.
    12. George P. Huber, 1983. "Cognitive Style as a Basis for MIS and DSS Designs: Much ADO About Nothing?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(5), pages 567-579, May.
    13. Henry C. Lucas, Jr., 1975. "Performance and the Use of an Information System," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(8), pages 908-919, April.
    14. Shelby H. McIntyre, 1982. "An Experimental Study of the Impact of Judgment-Based Marketing Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 17-33, January.
    15. Nancy Paule Melone, 1990. "A Theoretical Assessment of the User-Satisfaction Construct in Information Systems Research," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(1), pages 76-91, January.
    16. Ramesh Sharda & Steve H. Barr & James C. McDonnell, 1988. "Decision Support System Effectiveness: A Review and an Empirical Test," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 139-159, February.
    17. James E. Bailey & Sammy W. Pearson, 1983. "Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(5), pages 530-545, May.
    18. Michael J. Ginzberg, 1981. "Early Diagnosis of MIS Implementation Failure: Promising Results and Unanswered Questions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 459-478, April.
    19. Randolph B. Cooper & Robert W. Zmud, 1990. "Information Technology Implementation Research: A Technological Diffusion Approach," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 123-139, February.
    20. Phillip Ein-Dor & Eli Segev, 1978. "Organizational Context and the Success of Management Information Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(10), pages 1064-1077, June.
    21. Starr Roxanne Hiltz & Kenneth Johnson, 1990. "User Satisfaction with Computer-Mediated Communication Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(6), pages 739-764, June.
    22. E. Burton Swanson, 1974. "Management Information Systems: Appreciation and Involvement," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(2), pages 178-188, October.
    23. Dipankar Chakravarti & Andrew Mitchell & Richard Staelin, 1979. "Judgment Based Marketing Decision Models: An Experimental Investigation of the Decision Calculus Approach," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 251-263, March.
    24. Gary W. Dickson & James A. Senn & Norman L. Chervany, 1977. "Research in Management Information Systems: The Minnesota Experiments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(9), pages 913-934, May.
    25. William R. King & Jamie I. Rodriguez, 1981. "Note---Participative Design of Strategic Decision Support Systems: An Empirical Assessment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(6), pages 717-726, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gelderman, Maarten, 1997. "Task difficulty, task variability and satisfaction with management support systems: consequences and solutions ˜," Serie Research Memoranda 0053, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    2. Gelderman, Maarten, 1997. "The relation between user information satisfaction, usage of management support systems and performance," Serie Research Memoranda 0043, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rajiv D. Banker & Robert J. Kauffman, 2004. "50th Anniversary Article: The Evolution of Research on Information Systems: A Fiftieth-Year Survey of the Literature in Management Science," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(3), pages 281-298, March.
    2. Gelderman, Maarten, 1997. "Task difficulty, task variability and satisfaction with management support systems: consequences and solutions ˜," Serie Research Memoranda 0053, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    3. Berend Wierenga & Gerrit H. Van Bruggen & Richard Staelin, 1999. "The Success of Marketing Management Support Systems," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 196-207.
    4. Gerrit H. van Bruggen & Ale Smidts & Berend Wierenga, 1998. "Improving Decision Making by Means of a Marketing Decision Support System," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(5), pages 645-658, May.
    5. John W. Boudreau, 2004. "50th Anniversary Article: Organizational Behavior, Strategy, Performance, and Design in Management Science," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(11), pages 1463-1476, November.
    6. Althuizen, N.A.P. & Wierenga, B., 2003. "The Effectiveness of Case-Based Reasoning: An Application in Sales Promotions," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2003-053-MKT, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    7. Goodwin, Paul & Fildes, Robert & Lawrence, Michael & Nikolopoulos, Konstantinos, 2007. "The process of using a forecasting support system," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 391-404.
    8. Bharati, Pratyush & Berg, Daniel, 2005. "Service quality from the other side: Information systems management at Duquesne Light," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 367-380.
    9. Au, Norman & Ngai, Eric W. T. & Cheng, T. C. Edwin, 2002. "A critical review of end-user information system satisfaction research and a new research framework," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 451-478, December.
    10. Mohd Sazili Shahibi & Azlinda Saidin & Tengku Adil Tengku Izhar, 2016. "A Framework Based on Human Resource Management Information System (HRMIS) for the Evaluation of Users Satisfaction," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 6(10), pages 62-76, October.
    11. Jong Uk Kim & Rajiv Kishore, 2019. "Do we Fully Understand Information Systems Failure? An Exploratory Study of the Cognitive Schema of IS Professionals," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(6), pages 1385-1419, December.
    12. Petersen, Knut & Patzke, Henning, 1986. "Individuelles Informationsverhalten als Gegenstand des "Behavioral Accounting": Eine Meta-Analyse der empirischen Forschung," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 177, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    13. Schmidt, Reinhart, 1983. "The usage of an interactive modeling system," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 127, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    14. Sahin, Izzet & Zahedi, Fatemeh (Mariam), 2000. "Optimal policies under risk for changing software systems based on customer satisfaction," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(1), pages 175-194, May.
    15. Bhimani, Alnoor, 2003. "A study of the emergence of management accounting system ethos and its influence on perceived system success," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 523-548, August.
    16. Lu, Hsi-Peng & Yu, Huei-Ju & Lu, Simon S. K., 2001. "The effects of cognitive style and model type on DSS acceptance: An empirical study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(3), pages 649-663, June.
    17. van Bruggen, G.H. & Wierenga, B., 2005. "When are CRM Systems Successful? The Perspective of the User and of the Organization," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2005-048-MKT, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    18. Lilien, Gary L. & Rangaswamy, Arvind & van Bruggen, Gerrit H. & Wierenga, Berend, 2002. "Bridging the marketing theory-practice gap with marketing engineering," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 111-121, February.
    19. Jahangir Karimi & Toni M. Somers & Yash P. Gupta, 2004. "Impact of Environmental Uncertainty and Task Characteristics on User Satisfaction with Data," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 15(2), pages 175-193, June.
    20. Gelderman, Maarten, 1997. "The relation between user information satisfaction, usage of management support systems and performance," Serie Research Memoranda 0043, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vua:wpaper:1995-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: R. Dam (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fewvunl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.