IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/77730.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Применение Почвозащитных Технологий В Регионах, Подверженных Ветровой Эрозии: Механизмы Мотивации Собственников Земли
[Application of soil protection technologies in regions prone to wind erosion: mechanisms for motivating landowners]

Author

Listed:
  • Stukach, Victor

Abstract

The purpose is to reveal the factors of motivations of the agricultural enterprises and certain farmers in the course of application of the nature preservation technologies; the priority of protection the natural resources in motivation of farmers; to develop a technique of studying the social and economic mechanisms of use of the soil-protective systems. The novelty consists in complex studying of motivation of rural producers by means of the technique considering macro-social and micro-social factors of application of the nature preservation technologies for the regions subject to wind erosion of soils (Kazakhstan, the Volga region, Siberia, etc.). The results are as follows: the policy in the sphere of the nature preservation technologies has to consider the factors influencing the choice of decisions regarding the use of technologies. Among the factors are demographic situation, poverty level, the state policy, measure of sensibleness of the carried-out actions, access to information, and economic efficiency for the economic entity. The action program directed on formation of the social and economic mechanism, pricing, subsidies and trade policy in agriculture has been proposed, as well as creations of the monitoring system of soils condition, consumption of fertilizers, pesticides, soil cover and the ground waters. The scope of results is the following: professional communities, state authorities, municipalities, scientific and research and educational institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Stukach, Victor, 2013. "Применение Почвозащитных Технологий В Регионах, Подверженных Ветровой Эрозии: Механизмы Мотивации Собственников Земли [Application of soil protection technologies in regions prone to wind erosion: ," MPRA Paper 77730, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Mar 2017.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:77730
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/77730/1/MPRA_paper_77730.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Winiecki, Jan, 1994. "Shaping the Institutional Infrastructure," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 32(1), pages 66-78, January.
    2. Стукач Виктор Федорович, 2011. "Инфраструктура Производственных Услуг: Новые Тенденции," Экономика региона, CyberLeninka;Федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение науки «Институт экономики Уральского отделения Российской академии наук», issue 4, pages 133-142.
    3. Harold Demsetz, 1968. "The Cost of Transacting," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 82(1), pages 33-53.
    4. Häring, Anna Maria & Vairo, Daniela & Dabbert, Stephan & Zanoli, Raffaele, 2009. "Organic farming policy development in the EU: What can multi-stakeholder processes contribute?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 265-272, June.
    5. Solomon Asfaw & Benjamin Davis & Josh Dewbre & Sudhanshu Handa & Paul Winters, 2014. "Cash Transfer Programme, Productive Activities and Labour Supply: Evidence from a Randomised Experiment in Kenya," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(8), pages 1172-1196, August.
    6. Stukach, Victor & Shumakova, Oksana & Anicina, Nadejda & Pomogaev, Vitaly, 2016. "Influence on Transaction Costs and Market Barriers of Organizational Behaviour and Culture of the Rural Population: Analysis and Research Practice," MPRA Paper 83326, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2017.
    7. Janice Peterson, 2002. "The TANF Reauthorization Debate: Key Welfare Reform Issues and Concerns," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(2), pages 431-439, June.
    8. Janice Peterson, 2000. "Welfare Reform and Inequality: The TANF and UI Programs," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(2), pages 517-526, June.
    9. Stukach, Victor & Pomogaev, Vitaly & Zinich, Alla & Nflejta, Anicin, 2015. "Protección Social: Infraestructura Regional de Distribución de Asistencia Alimentaria," MPRA Paper 81523, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Jun 2017.
    10. Rey Koslowski, 1992. "Market Institutions, East European Reform, and Economic Theory," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 673-705, September.
    11. Andersson, Hans & Ramamurtie, Sailesh & Ramaswami, Bharat, 2003. "Labor income and risky investments: can part-time farmers compete?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 50(4), pages 477-493, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stukach, Victor & Grishaev, Egor, 2008. "Агропродовольственный Рынок Региона: Классификация Институтов, Административные Барьеры, Трансакционные Издержки, Неэффективные Посредники [The region's agro-food market: the classification of inst," MPRA Paper 79290, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Apr 2017.
    2. Аникина, Надежда & Стукач, Виктор, 2012. "Неформальные Институты Трансакционного Сектора Региона: Агроэкономический Аспект [Informal institutions transaction sector of the region: the agro-economic aspect]," MPRA Paper 74171, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Feb 2016.
    3. Виктор, Стукач & Надежда, Аникина, 2016. "Влияние Организационной Культуры На Уровень Трансакционных Издержек В Аграрной Экономике [Organizational culture influences the level of transaction costs in the agrarian economy]," MPRA Paper 73204, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Aug 2016.
    4. Стукач Виктор Федорович, 2011. "Инфраструктура Производственных Услуг: Новые Тенденции," Экономика региона, CyberLeninka;Федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение науки «Институт экономики Уральского отделения Российской академии наук», issue 4, pages 133-142.
    5. Natali, Starovoytova & Victor, Stukach, 2017. "Продовольственное Обеспечение Нуждающихся: Концепция Социально Ориентированного Сельского Хозяйства, Институциональная Среда Продовольственной Помощи Населению, Потенциал Органического Земледелия, Пил," MPRA Paper 81808, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Oct 2017.
    6. Stukach, Victor & Daueshov, Marat, 2002. "Адаптация Хозяйствующих Субъектов Аграрной Сферы: Конъюнктурное Изучение, Государственное Регулирования, Информационная База [Adaptation of economic entities of the agrarian sphere: opportunistic s," MPRA Paper 79120, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Dec 2015.
    7. Stukach, Victor & Pomogaev, Vitaly & Zinich, Alla & Nflejta, Anicin, 2015. "Protección Social: Infraestructura Regional de Distribución de Asistencia Alimentaria," MPRA Paper 81523, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Jun 2017.
    8. Axelsen, Dan & Underwood, Daniel A. & Friesner, Dan, 2009. "Cultural filtering in the hiring process and its relationship to welfare reform," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 495-508, June.
    9. Stukach, Victor & Astashova, Ekaterina & Shumakova, Oksana, 2006. "Трансакционные Издержки На Аграрном Рынке: Измерение, Регулирование, Оптимизация [Transaction costs in the agrarian market: measurement, regulation, optimization]," MPRA Paper 78031, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Jan 2017.
    10. Boncinelli, Fabio & Bartolini, Fabio & Casini, Leonardo, 2018. "Structural factors of labour allocation for farm diversification activities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 204-212.
    11. Gehrig, Thomas & Jackson, Matthew, 1998. "Bid-ask spreads with indirect competition among specialists," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 89-119, April.
    12. Richard K. Lyons, 1996. "Foreign Exchange Volume: Sound and Fury Signifying Nothing?," NBER Chapters, in: The Microstructure of Foreign Exchange Markets, pages 183-208, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. Krassimira Naydenova, 2018. "Built-In Problems in the New European Regulations for the Bulgarian Capital Market," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 5, pages 106-134.
    14. Tancrède Voituriez, 2020. "The quest for green welfare state in developing countries," Working Papers hal-02876972, HAL.
    15. Oscar Jorda & Holly Liu & Jeffrey Williams, 2003. "Non-Institutional Market Making Behavior: The Dalian Futures Exchange," Working Papers 41, University of California, Davis, Department of Economics.
    16. Ulibarri, Carlos A. & Schatzberg, John, 2003. "Liquidity costs: Screen-based trading versus open outcry," Review of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 381-396.
    17. Jamshed Y. Uppal, 2009. "The Role of Satellite Stock Exchanges: A Case Study of the Lahore Stock Exchange," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 14(2), pages 1-47, Jul-Dec.
    18. Benjamin M. Blau & Todd G. Griffith & Ryan J. Whitby, 2020. "Opacity and the comovement in the stock prices of banks," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(4), pages 3557-3580, December.
    19. Flannery, Mark J. & Kwan, Simon H. & Nimalendran, Mahendrarajah, 2013. "The 2007–2009 financial crisis and bank opaqueness," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 55-84.
    20. Moraga-Gonzalez, Jose L. & Wildenbeest, Matthijs R., 2011. "Comparison sites," IESE Research Papers D/933, IESE Business School.
      • Jose Luis Moraga-Gonzalez & Matthijs R. Wildenbeest, 2011. "Comparison Sites," Working Papers 2011-04, Indiana University, Kelley School of Business, Department of Business Economics and Public Policy.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    technological development; soil-protective system of agriculture; diffusion model; protection of the soil against erosion.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q51 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Valuation of Environmental Effects
    • Q52 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Pollution Control Adoption and Costs; Distributional Effects; Employment Effects
    • Q57 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Ecological Economics
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:77730. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.