In an optimal auction, a revenue-optimizing seller often awards goods inefficiently, either by placing them in the wrong hands or by withholding goods from the market. This conclusion rests on two assumptions: (1) the seller can prevent resale among bidders after the auction; and (2) the seller can commit to not sell the withheld goods after the auction. We examine how the optimal auction problem changes when these assumptions are relaxed. In sharp contrast to the no resale assumption, we assume perfect resale: all gains from trade are exhausted in resale. In a multiple object model with independent signals, we characterize optimal auctions with resale. We prove generally that with perfect resale, the seller's incentive to misassign goods is destroyed. Moreover, with discrete types, any misassignment of goods strictly lowers the seller's revenue from the optimum. In auction markets followed by perfect resale, it is optimal to assign goods to those with the highest values.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by University of Maryland, Department of Economics - Peter Cramton in its series Papers of Peter Cramton with number
98wpoe.
Length: 29 pages Date of creation: 28 May 1998 Date of revision:
18 Jun 1999 Handle: RePEc:pcc:pccumd:98wpoe
Note: Working Paper Contact details of provider: Postal: Economics Department, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-7211 Phone: (202) 318-0520 Fax: (202) 318-0520 Web page: http://www.cramton.umd.edu
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Peter Cramton).
Find related papers by JEL classification: D44 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure and Pricing - - - Auctions
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
Rod Garratt & Thomas Tröger, 2005.
"Speculation in Standard Auctions with Resale,"
Discussion Papers
42, SFB/TR 15 Governance and the Efficiency of Economic Systems, Free University of Berlin, Humboldt University of Berlin, University of Bonn, University of Mannheim, University of Munich.
[Downloadable!]
Giacomo Calzolari & Alessandro Pavan, 2003.
"Monopoly with Resale,"
Working Papers
2003.20, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions:
Giacomo Calzolari & Alessandro Pavan, 2004.
"Monopoly with Resale,"
Discussion Papers
1393, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
[Downloadable!]
Giacomo Calzolari & Alessandro Pavan, 2005.
"Monopoly with Resale,"
Discussion Papers
1405, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
[Downloadable!]
Peter Cramton, 2002.
"Spectrum Auctions,"
Papers of Peter Cramton
01hte, University of Maryland, Department of Economics - Peter Cramton, revised 16 Jul 2001.
[Downloadable!]