IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/isu/genstf/201501010800005377.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Studies on electric power markets: preparing for the penetration of renewable resources

Author

Listed:
  • Heo, Deung-Yong Yong

Abstract

This thesis investigates the implication of empirical grounded electric power market facts using multiple methodologies, including market and contract design, analytic method, statistical method, and agent-based simulation method. Basically, this thesis focuses on centrally-managed electric power markets.European and U.S. electricity sectors have undergone substantial restructuring over the past twenty years. They have devolved from highly regulated systems operated by vertically integrated utilities to relatively decentralized systems based more fully on market valuation and allocation mechanisms.These restructuring efforts have been driven by a desire to ensure efficient energy production and utilization, reliable energy supplies, affordable energy prices, and effective rules and regulations for environmental protection. In keeping with the latter goal, a dramatic change is taking place in energy mixes: namely, a rapid penetration of variable energy resources combined with a movement away from traditional thermal generation.Variable energy resources (VERs) are renewable energy resources, such as wind and solar power, whose generation cannot be closely controlled to match changes in load or to meet other system requirements. Consequently, the integration of VERs tends to increase the volatility of net load (ie, load minus as-available generation) as well as the frequency of strong ramp events. Flexibility in service provision by other types of resources then becomes increasingly important to maintain the reliability and efficiency of power system operations.To accommodate increased VER penetration, TSOs and ISOs have introduced major changes in their market rules and operational procedures. These changes have included new product definitions to enhance load-following capability (eg, ramping products), revised market eligibility requirements to encourage greater VER participation, and the introduction of capacity markets in an attempt to ensure sufficient thermal generation as a backstop for the intermittency of VER generation.Also, CO2 emission issues are increasing important in electric power markets. In the U.S., the largest source of CO2 emissions is the electricity sector, which was responsible for 32% of total emissions in 2012. The Obama Administration proposed a Clean Power Plan in June 2014; nationwide, by 2030, this plan would achieve approximately 30 percent of CO2 emission reduction relative to 2005 CO2 emission levels in the power sector. There are several important issues arising from carbon mitigation options such as a carbon tax imposition and increase penetration of VERs need to be resolved.Chapter 2 introduces standardized energy and reserve contracts with swing (flexibility) in their contractual terms to resolve key issues that have arisen for centrally-managed wholesale electric power markets with increased penetration of renewable energy resources. Concrete examples are used to demonstrate how the trading of these standardized contracts can be supported by linked forward markets in a manner that permits efficient real-time balancing of net load subject to system and reserve-requirement constraints. Comparisons with existing wholesale electric power markets are given, and key policy implications are highlighted.Chapter 3 extends the system pattern short-term forecasting method for power systems to incorporate non-dispatchable renewable energy, thus permitting the forecasting of CO2 emissions along with the forecasting of prices, line congestion, and other system variables. It also develops an empirically-based system pattern transition matrix permitting a dynamic extension of the method. The practical usefulness of the resulting extended forecasting method is illustrated by means of a 5-bus test system based on data from the Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO).Chapter 4 develops a 9-zone test system based on MISO data for application in electric power market studies. This 9-zone test system models MISO's original seven midwestern zones together with two recently-incorporated southern zones operating over a 15-line AC transmission grid. Generators with different fuel types and capacities submit hourly supply offers in a day-ahead market (DAM). Load-serving entities submit hourly demand bids into a day-ahead market in the form of a 24-hour regional load profile. This 9-zone test system allows a wide range of sensitivity studies. To illustrate the capabilities of the 9-zone test system, this study undertakes a comparative study of DAM Locational Marginal Price (LMP) outcomes for MISO prior to and after the integration of the two southern zones by conducting test-bed simulations for 7-zone and 9-zone test cases based on MISO data.Chapter 5 analyzes how the imposition of a carbon tax and the increased penetration of wind power in such markets could impact CO2 emissions and other key outcomes, such as energy dispatch, energy prices, market participant profits (by fuel type), and government tax revenues. Another innovation of this part is that the effects of increases in a carbon tax and wind power penetration are studied jointly. It is shown, for example, that CO2 emissions decrease from 0.23% to 6.17% as the carbon tax and the degree of wind penetration are systematically varied from a base case of zero tax and zero wind. The profits of coal- and oil-fired generation systematically decrease with increases in the carbon tax and/or increases in wind penetration, but the profits of other types of generation exhibit a more complex response. Comparisons with current MISO conditions are also given, and key policy implications are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Heo, Deung-Yong Yong, 2015. "Studies on electric power markets: preparing for the penetration of renewable resources," ISU General Staff Papers 201501010800005377, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:201501010800005377
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/bdd4440a-e1eb-428e-8496-e8495edfa826/content
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tesfatsion, Leigh, 2009. "Auction Basics for Wholesale Power Markets: Objectives and Pricing Rules," Staff General Research Papers Archive 13074, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    2. Stern,Nicholas, 2007. "The Economics of Climate Change," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521700801.
    3. Jorgenson, Dale W. & Wilcoxen, Peter J., 1993. "Reducing US carbon emissions: an econometric general equilibrium assessment," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 7-25, March.
    4. Deng, S.J. & Oren, S.S., 2006. "Electricity derivatives and risk management," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 940-953.
    5. Anke Weidlich & Frank Sensfuß & Massimo Genoese & Daniel Veit, 2008. "Studying the effects of CO2 emissions trading on the electricity market: A multi-agent-based approach," Springer Books, in: Ralf Antes & Bernd Hansjürgens & Peter Letmathe (ed.), Emissions Trading, pages 91-101, Springer.
    6. Oren, Shmuel S., 2005. "Generation Adequacy via Call Options Obligations: Safe Passage to the Promised Land," The Electricity Journal, Elsevier, vol. 18(9), pages 28-42, November.
    7. Cong, Rong-Gang & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2010. "Potential impact of (CET) carbon emissions trading on China’s power sector: A perspective from different allowance allocation options," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(9), pages 3921-3931.
    8. Casler, Stephen D. & Rafiqui, Aisha, 1993. "Evaluating Fuel Tax Equity: Direct and Indirect Distributional Effects," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 46(2), pages 197-205, June.
    9. Deb, Rajat & Albert, Richard & Hsue, Lie-Long & Brown, Nicholas, 2000. "How to Incorporate Volatility and Risk in Electricity Price Forecasting," The Electricity Journal, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 65-75, May.
    10. Nicholas Bull & Kevin A. Hassett & Gilbert E. Metcalf, 1994. "Who Pays Broad-Based Energy Taxes? Computing Lifetime and Regional Incidence," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 3), pages 145-164.
    11. Peter Cramton & Axel Ockenfels, 2012. "Economics and Design of Capacity Markets for the Power Sector," Papers of Peter Cramton 12cocap, University of Maryland, Department of Economics - Peter Cramton, revised 2012.
    12. repec:aei:rpaper:47909 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Casler, Stephen D. & Rafiqui, Aisha, 1993. "Evaluating Fuel Tax Equity: Direct and Indirect Distributional Effects," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association, vol. 46(2), pages 197-205, June.
    14. A. Lans Bovenberg & Lawrence H. Goulder, 1995. "Costs of Environmentally Motivated Taxes in the Presence of Other Taxes:General Equilibrium Analyses," NBER Working Papers 5117, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Delmas, Magali A. & Montes-Sancho, Maria J., 2011. "U.S. state policies for renewable energy: Context and effectiveness," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 2273-2288, May.
    16. Ma, Tieju & Nakamori, Yoshiteru, 2009. "Modeling technological change in energy systems – From optimization to agent-based modeling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(7), pages 873-879.
    17. Bidwell, Miles, 2005. "Reliability Options: A Market-Oriented Approach to Long-Term Adequacy," The Electricity Journal, Elsevier, vol. 18(5), pages 11-25, June.
    18. Sensfuß, Frank & Ragwitz, Mario & Genoese, Massimo, 2008. "The merit-order effect: A detailed analysis of the price effect of renewable electricity generation on spot market prices in Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 3076-3084, August.
    19. Chao, Hung-Po & Wilson, Robert, 2002. "Multi-dimensional Procurement Auctions for Power Reserves: Robust Incentive-Compatible Scoring and Settlement Rules," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 161-183, September.
    20. Phil Wild & William Paul Bell & John Foster, 2012. "The Impact of Carbon Pricing on Wholesale Electricity Prices, Carbon Pass-Through Rates and Retail Electricity Tariffs in Australia," Energy Economics and Management Group Working Papers 5-2012, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    21. Menz, Fredric C., 2005. "Green electricity policies in the United States: case study," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(18), pages 2398-2410, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heo, Deung-Yong & Tesfatsion, Leigh, 2013. "Standardized Contracts with Swing for the Market-Supported Procurement of Energy and Reserve: Illustrative Examples," Staff General Research Papers Archive 36747, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    2. Peter Cramton & Axel Ockenfels & Steven Stoft, 2013. "Capacity Market Fundamentals," Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 2).
    3. Nils Ohlendorf & Michael Jakob & Jan Christoph Minx & Carsten Schröder & Jan Christoph Steckel, 2021. "Distributional Impacts of Carbon Pricing: A Meta-Analysis," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 78(1), pages 1-42, January.
    4. A. Lans Bovenberg & Lawrence H. Goulder, 2001. "Neutralizing the Adverse Industry Impacts of CO2 Abatement Policies: What Does It Cost?," NBER Chapters, in: Behavioral and Distributional Effects of Environmental Policy, pages 45-90, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Martin Beznoska & Johanna Cludius & Viktor Steiner, 2012. "The Incidence of the European Union Emissions Trading System and the Role of Revenue Recycling: Empirical Evidence from Combined Industry- and Household-Level Data," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1227, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    6. Parry, Ian W.H. & Sigman, Hilary & Walls, Margaret & Williams, Roberton C., III, 2005. "The Incidence of Pollution Control Policies," Discussion Papers 10651, Resources for the Future.
    7. Woo, C.K. & Sreedharan, P. & Hargreaves, J. & Kahrl, F. & Wang, J. & Horowitz, I., 2014. "A review of electricity product differentiation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 262-272.
    8. Wadud, Zia, 2011. "Personal tradable carbon permits for road transport: Why, why not and who wins?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(10), pages 1052-1065.
    9. Fontini, Fulvio & Vargiolu, Tiziano & Zormpas, Dimitrios, 2021. "Investing in electricity production under a reliability options scheme," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    10. Nils Ohlendorf & Michael Jakob & Jan Christoph Minx & Carsten Schröder & Jan Christoph Steckel, 2018. "Distributional Impacts of Climate Mitigation Policies - a Meta-Analysis," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1776, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    11. Wolfgang Buchholz & Jonas Frank & Hans-Dieter Karl & Johannes Pfeiffer & Karen Pittel & Ursula Triebswetter & Jochen Habermann & Wolfgang Mauch & Thomas Staudacher, 2012. "Die Zukunft der Energiemärkte: Ökonomische Analyse und Bewertung von Potenzialen und Handlungsmöglichkeiten," ifo Forschungsberichte, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 57.
    12. Sebastian Schäfer & Lisa Altvater, 2021. "A Capacity Market for the Transition towards Renewable-Based Electricity Generation with Enhanced Political Feasibility," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-24, September.
    13. Cludius, Johanna & Beznoska, Martin & Steiner, Viktor, 2012. "Distributional effects of the European Emissions Trading System and the role of revenue recycling: Empirical evidence from combined industry- and household-level data," Discussion Papers 2012/6, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    14. Dorothee Boccanfuso & Antonio Estache & Luc Savard, 2011. "The Intra-country Distributional Impact of Policies to Fight Climate Change: A Survey," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(1), pages 97-117.
    15. Börjesson, Maria & Asplund, Disa & Hamilton, Carl, 2021. "Optimal kilometre tax for electric passenger cars," Working Papers 2021:3, Swedish National Road & Transport Research Institute (VTI).
    16. Asensio, Javier & Matas, Anna & Raymond, Jose-Luis, 2003. "Petrol expenditure and redistributive effects of its taxation in Spain," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 49-69, January.
    17. Louis Kaplow, 2010. "Optimal Control of Externalities in the Presence of Income Taxation," STICERD - Public Economics Programme Discussion Papers 02, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSE.
    18. Peter Cramton & Axel Ockenfels, 2012. "Economics and Design of Capacity Markets for the Power Sector," Papers of Peter Cramton 12cocap, University of Maryland, Department of Economics - Peter Cramton, revised 2012.
    19. Ortega, Margarita & del Río, Pablo & Montero, Eduardo A., 2013. "Assessing the benefits and costs of renewable electricity. The Spanish case," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 294-304.
    20. Jenner, Steffen & Groba, Felix & Indvik, Joe, 2013. "Assessing the strength and effectiveness of renewable electricity feed-in tariffs in European Union countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 385-401.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:201501010800005377. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Curtis Balmer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deiasus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.