This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Tax Harmonization versus Tax Competition in Europe: A Game Theoretical Approach

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
André Fourçans () (ESSEC Business School)
Thierry Warin () (CREFE and CIRANO)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to use a game theoretical approach to analyze tax harmonization, or competition, in a monetary union, more specifically in Europe. Without harmonization, free-riding behaviors may appear, leading to a sub-optimal tax equilibrium. Tax competition may also create budgetary problems and the objective of a balanced budget may not be attained. But national tax autonomy has one main advantage: as monetary policy is 'federalized', and as fiscal policy is constrained by the Stability and Growth Pact, taxation becomes the last macroeconomic instrument within governments' hands to deal with asymmetric shocks. The literature often condemns tax autonomy because of possible free-riding behaviors. In such a case, the competition could conduct to the lowest tax rate of all countries, condemning others to diminish their public spending. But, this analysis rests on a static point of view: In that case, harmonization with strict rules is Pareto-optimum. In the dynamic case, as harmonization costs are not incurred, the final equilibrium may be of a higher welfare level. Coordination would occur without the need for strict rules. If countries maintain sound public finance, tax competition would not lead to a 'race to the bottom'.

L'objet de ce papier est d'utiliser une approche en terme de théorie des jeux afin d'étudier les questions d'harmonisation ou de compétition fiscale au sein d'une union monétaire. Plus spécifiquement, cette étude concerne l'Union économique et monétaire et le risque de « guerre d'usure ». Les arguments traditionnels sont d'une part que sans harmonisation, des comportements de « free-riding » peuvent apparaître, menant à un équilibre sous optimal en matière de politique fiscale, et d'autre part que la compétition peut aussi être à l'origine de problèmes importants en matière d'équilibre budgétaire. Mais l'autonomie fiscale a un avantage majeur. Lorsque la politique monétaire n'est plus du ressort des pays et lorsque la politique budgétaire est contrainte par le Pacte de stabilité et de croissance, l'instrument fiscal devient le dernier outil macro-économique à la disposition des gouvernements pour absorber les chocs asymétriques. Le modèle proposé est construit sous deux horizons. Si l’horizon est fini, les conclusions traditionnelles de la littérature en faveur de l'harmonisation sont représentées. Avec un horizon infini, les joueurs prennent en compte les coûts de dévier et d'entrer dans une guerre d'usure. La coordination apparaît alors sans qu'il y ait besoin d'un mécanisme institutionnel pour la forcer.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.unites.uqam.ca/eco/CREFE/cahiers/cah132.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function: Main text
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by CREFE, Université du Québec à Montréal in its series Cahiers de recherche CREFE / CREFE Working Papers with number 132.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 20 pages
Date of creation: Apr 2001
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:cre:crefwp:132

Contact details of provider:
Postal: P.O. Box 8888, Downtown Station, Montreal (Canada) Quebec, H3C 3P8
Phone: (514) 987-6181
Fax: (514) 987-8494
Email:
Web page: http://ideas.uqam.ca/CREFE/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Stéphane Pallage).

Related research
Keywords: Monetary union; Economic integration; Tax competition; Tax harmonization; Fiscal competition;

Find related papers by JEL classification:
H20 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - General
H26 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Tax Evasion
H77 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - Intergovernmental Relations; Federalism
H87 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - International Fiscal Issues; International Public Goods

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. Barro, Robert J. & Gordon, David B., 1983. "Rules, discretion and reputation in a model of monetary policy," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 101-121. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  2. Assaf Razin & Efraim Sadka, 1991. "International Tax Competition and Gains from Tax Harmonization," NBER Working Papers 3152, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  3. Bo Sandemann Rasmussen, . "International Tax Competition, Tax Cooperation and Capital Controls," Economics Working Papers 1997-9, School of Economics and Management, University of Aarhus. [Downloadable!]
  4. Persson, Torsten & Tabellini, Guido, 1992. "The Politics of 1992: Fiscal Policy and European Integration," Review of Economic Studies, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 59(4), pages 689-701, October. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  5. Alfons Weichenrieder, 1996. "Fighting international tax avoidance," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 17(1), pages 37-58, February. [Downloadable!]
  6. Wildasin, David, 1993. "Fiscal competition and interindustry trade," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 369-399, July. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  7. Cardarelli, R. & Taugourdeau, E. & Vidal, J.-P., 1999. "A Repeated Interactions Model of Tax Competition," G.R.E.Q.A.M. 99a34, Universite Aix-Marseille III.
    Other versions:
  8. Wilson, John Douglas, 1987. "Trade, Capital Mobility, and Tax Competition," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 95(4), pages 835-56, August. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  9. Benoit, Jean-Pierre & Krishna, Vijay, 1985. "Finitely Repeated Games," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 53(4), pages 905-22, July. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  10. Alfred Boss, 1999. "Do We Need Tax Harmonization in the EU?," Kiel Working Papers 916, Kiel Institute for the World Economy. [Downloadable!]
  11. LOPEZÊ, Salvador & MARCHANDÊ, Maurice & PESTIEAUÊ, Pierre, 1996. "A Simple Two-Country Model of Redistributive Capital Income Taxation," CORE Discussion Papers 1996025, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
  12. Holmlund, B. & Kolm, A.-S., 1999. "Economic Integration, Imperfect Competition, and International Policy Coordination," Papers 1999:7, Uppsala - Working Paper Series.
    Other versions:
  13. Espinosa-Vega, Marco A & Yip, Chong K, 1994. "On the Sustainability of International Coordination," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 35(2), pages 383-96, May. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  14. Cremer, Helmuth & Gahvari, Firouz, 2000. "Tax evasion, fiscal competition and economic integration," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(9), pages 1633-1657, October. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  15. Kreps, David M & Wilson, Robert, 1982. "Sequential Equilibria," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 50(4), pages 863-94, July. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
Full references

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

  1. Libman, Alexander, 2005. "Взаимодействие Государственных И Частных Структур В Интеграционных Группировах: Теоретические Подходы И Оп," MPRA Paper 17044, University Library of Munich, Germany. [Downloadable!]
  2. Killian McCarthy & Frederik van Doorn & Brigitte Unger, 2008. "Globalisation, Tax Competition and the Harmonisation of Corporate Tax Rates in Europe: A Case of Killing the Patient to Cure the Disease?," Working Papers 08-13, Utrecht School of Economics. [Downloadable!]
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? Authors registered on the RePEc Author Service receive monthly emails with details about downloads and abstract views of their works.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-6.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.