This paper analyzes peer effects among university scientists. Specifically, it investigates whether thenumber of peers and their average quality affects the productivity of researchers in physics, chemistry,and mathematics. The usual endogeneity problems related to estimating peer effects are addressed byusing the dismissal of scientists by the Nazi government as a source of exogenous variation in the peergroup of scientists staying in Germany. Using a newly constructed panel dataset covering the universeof physicists, chemists, and mathematicians at all German universities from 1925 until 1938 Iinvestigate peer effects at the local level and among co-authors. There is no evidence for localizedpeer effects, as neither department level (e.g. the physics department) nor specialization level (e.g. alltheoretical physicists in the department) peers affect a researcher's productivity. Among co-authors,however, there is strong and significant evidence that peer quality affects a researcher's productivity.Loosing a co-author of average quality reduces the productivity of an average scientist by about 13percent in physics and 16.5 percent in chemistry.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Centre for Economic Performance, LSE in its series CEP Discussion Papers with number
dp0910.
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Did you know? All full texts are decentralized with the publishers, none reside on this server, thus making it possible to offer this service for free to all parties.