IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iaaeo7/198194.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Analysis of Australian Consumer Preference for pST-Pork Products

Author

Listed:
  • Halbrendt, Catherine
  • Pesek, John
  • April, Parsons
  • Lindner, Robert

Abstract

Conjoint measurement was used to determine consumer preference for pork produced with genetically engineered porcine somatotropin (pST). A preference model was constructed based on three pork attributes, fat reduction, price and technology, which allowed for estimable interactions between attributes. Interview surveys were used to collect conjoint data in several shopping centres in three cities. Respondents generally preferred leaner pST-produced pork, but only at fat reduction levels greater than currently attainable with conventional technology.

Suggested Citation

  • Halbrendt, Catherine & Pesek, John & April, Parsons & Lindner, Robert, 1997. "Analysis of Australian Consumer Preference for pST-Pork Products," 1997 Occasional Paper Series No. 7 198194, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:iaaeo7:198194
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.198194
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/198194/files/agecon-occpapers-1997-034_1_.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.198194?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ratchford, Brian T, 1975. "The New Economic Theory of Consumer Behavior: An Interpretive Essay," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 2(2), pages 65-75, Se.
    2. Bartley, Scott & Ball, Katrina & Weeks, Peter, 1988. "Household Meat Consumption in Sydney and Melbourne," Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences (ABARES) Archive 316163, Australian Government, Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manalo, Alberto B., 1989. "Benefits Sought by Apple Consumers," Working Papers 115908, Regional Research Project NE-165 Private Strategies, Public Policies, and Food System Performance.
    2. Wilfred Kassangoye & Robert Rugimbana, 2013. "Internet adoption and usage patterns among Students in selected South African Universities," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 5(6), pages 376-384.
    3. Aldrich, Lorna, 1999. "Consumer Use of Information: Implications for Food Policy," Miscellaneous Publications 330083, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Sancharan Roy, 2011. "Competitiveness in Service Sector," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 12(1), pages 51-69, February.
    5. de Bont, Cees J. P. M. & Schoormans, Jan P. L., 1995. "The effects of product expertise on consumer evaluations of new-product concepts," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 599-615, December.
    6. Zargham Ullah Khan & Muhammad Bilal Ahmad & Khadija Saeed, 2022. "The Impact of COVID-19 on Tourism and Hospitality Industry: A Qualitative Investigation in Pakistan," Journal of Policy Research (JPR), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 8(4), pages 439-446, December.
    7. Brendan Markey-Towler, 2018. "A formal psychological theory for evolutionary economics," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 691-725, September.
    8. Garrett, Vicki & Koontz, Tomas M., 2008. "Breaking the cycle: Producer and consumer perspectives on the non-adoption of passive solar housing in the US," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 1551-1566, April.
    9. John R. Hauser & Steven M. Shugan, 2008. "Defensive Marketing Strategies," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 88-110, 01-02.
    10. Wayne DeSarbo & Kamel Jedidi & Joel Steckel, 1991. "A stochastic multidimensional scaling procedure for the empirical determination of convex indifference curves for preference/choice analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 56(2), pages 279-307, June.
    11. Currim, Imran S. & Mintz, Ofer & Siddarth, S., 2015. "Information Accessed or Information Available? The Impact on Consumer Preferences Inferred at a Durable Product E-commerce Website," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 11-25.
    12. Chenhall, D. & Fraser, R.W. & Lloyd-Smith, J., 1990. "Beef Quality Preferences in Western Australia," Discussion Papers 232272, University of Western Australia, School of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    13. Marloes de Graaf-Zijl, 2005. "The Attractiveness of Temporary Employment to Reduce Adjustment Costs," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 05-121/3, Tinbergen Institute.
    14. Brunner-Sperdin, Alexandra & Scholl-Grissemann, Ursula S. & Stokburger-Sauer, Nicola E., 2014. "The relevance of holistic website perception. How sense-making and exploration cues guide consumers' emotions and behaviors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(12), pages 2515-2522.
    15. Bello, David C. & Holbrook, Morris B., 1995. "Does an absence of brand equity generalize across product classes?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 125-131, October.
    16. Burggraf, Christine, 2017. "Russian demand for dietary quality: Nutrition transition, diet quality measurement, and health investment theory," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies 269539, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    17. repec:zbw:iamost:269539 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Brown, James R., 2020. "The competitive structure of restaurant retailing: the impact of hedonic-utilitarian patronage motives," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 233-244.
    19. Jupiter Ndjeunga & Carl H. Nelson, 2005. "Toward understanding household preference for consumption characteristics of millet varieties: a case study from western Niger," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 32(2), pages 151-165, March.
    20. Tano, Kouadio & Kamuanga, Mulumba & Faminow, Merle D. & Swallow, Brent, 2003. "Using conjoint analysis to estimate farmer's preferences for cattle traits in West Africa," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 393-407, July.
    21. Ndjeunga, Jupiter & Nelson, Carl H., 2000. "Toward Understanding Household Preference For Millet Varieties In The West African Semi-Arid Tropics," 2000 Annual meeting, July 30-August 2, Tampa, FL 21883, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iaaeo7:198194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.