IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/gewi15/209190.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Analyse der Rollenverteilung in Winzergenossenschaften im Kontext des Qualitätsmanagements

Author

Listed:
  • Iselborn, Maximilian
  • Hanf, Jon
  • Ingenwerth, Lea
  • Sparer, Patrizia
  • Thein, Anne

Abstract

In Winzergenossenschaften bestehen Informationsasymmetrien, die von Mitgliedern durch opportunistisches Verhalten ausgenutzt werden können (SCHREYÖGG, 2003). Mitglieder und Geschäftsführer begleiten verschiedene Rollen. Bei Anwendung der Prinzipal-Agenten-Theorie auf die Unternehmensform Genossenschaft, wird deutlich, dass in dieser Mitglied und Geschäftsführung eine Doppelfunktion ausüben (EILERS & HANF, 1999). Dadurch entstehen Konflikte zwischen den Parteien, da beide gegensätzliche Interessen verfolgen. Dies hat Auswirkungen auf die Qualität. Mitglieder versuchen unter Einhaltung der Mindestanforderungen an die Qualität, den maximalen Ertrag zu erzielen. Die Annahme, dass eine klare Rollenverteilung notwendig ist, um hohe Qualitäten zu produzieren, wurde nach der Methode der comparative case studies nach DUL & HAK (2008) bei drei qualitätsführenden Winzergenossenschaften überprüft und konnte größtenteils bestätigt werden. Zwei der Geschäftsführer gingen explizit auf die Problematik der Doppelten-Prinzipal-Agenten-Theorie ein. In den Befragungen wurde deutlich, dass das Mitglied als Agent von der Geschäftsführung – dem Geschäftsführer, dem Kellermeister und dem Vorstandsvorsitzenden – als Prinzipal kontrolliert und motiviert wird. Die Geschäftsführung wird von dem Vorstand und dem Aufsichtsrat jährlich kontrolliert und hat eingeschränkte Entscheidungskompetenzen. Die Zusammenarbeit von Vorstandsvorsitzenden und Geschäftsführer wurde stark thematisiert. In den befragten Winzergenossenschaften werden Entscheidungen regelmäßig abgestimmt und werden so von dem Management getragen. Es wird versucht, die Genossenschaft als eigenständiges Unternehmen nach HELMBERGER & HOOS (1962, S. 275) weiterzuentwickeln. In den Winzergenossenschaften bestehen sehr detaillierte Anreizsysteme, die die Mitglieder motivieren, hohe Qualitäten zu produzieren (EILERS & HANF, 1999). Außerdem sind die befragten Geschäftsführer der Meinung, dass Mitgliedermotivation nicht nur durch monetäre Anreize, sondern auch durch den Aufbau von Vertrauen der Mitglieder in die Geschäftsführung ausgelöst wird. ISELBORN ET AL. (2014) formulieren nach HANF und SCHWEICKERT (2007) einen neuen Lösungsansatz, der die Bildung von strategischen Mitgliedergruppen vorsieht, welcher in den untersuchten Winzergenossenschaften nicht umgesetzt wurde. Die getroffene Annahme, dass eine klare Rollenverteilung vorliegen muss, um hohe Qualitäten zu produzieren, konnte mit den drei Fallstudien bestätigt werden. Weiterer Forschungsbedarf besteht in der Konfirmation der aus den bisherigen Erkenntnissen abgeleiteten Aussagen zum Zusammenhang von Rollenverteilung und Qualitätsmanagement in Winzergenossenschaften. Zusammenfassend konnte gezeigt werden, dass in allen drei Genossenschaften implizite und explizite Mechanismen Anwendung finden, um die Probleme der Doppelten-Prinzipal-Agenten-Problematik zu minimieren.

Suggested Citation

  • Iselborn, Maximilian & Hanf, Jon & Ingenwerth, Lea & Sparer, Patrizia & Thein, Anne, 2015. "Analyse der Rollenverteilung in Winzergenossenschaften im Kontext des Qualitätsmanagements," 55th Annual Conference, Giessen, Germany, September 23-25, 2015 209190, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:gewi15:209190
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.209190
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/209190/files/A2-125-Iselborn-Analyse_der_Rollenverteilung_in_Winzergenossenschaften.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.209190?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hak, A. & Dul, J., 2009. "Theory-Building With Cases," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2009-036-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    2. Peter Helmberger & Sidney Hoos, 1962. "Cooperative Enterprise and Organization Theory," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 44(2), pages 275-290.
    3. Jon Henrich Hanf & Erik Schweickert, 2012. "Power Play in the German Wine Business: Are German Wine Co-operatives able to Use their Power to manage their Business Relationships?," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 4(4), pages 227-238.
    4. Dieter Pennerstorfer & Christoph R. Weiss, 2013. "Product quality in the agri-food chain: do cooperatives offer high-quality wine?," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 40(1), pages 143-162, February.
    5. Bernd Frick, 2004. "Does Ownership Matter? Empirical Evidence from the German Wine Industry," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(3), pages 357-386, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Barbara Richter & Jon H. Hanf, 2021. "Cooperatives in the Wine Industry: Sustainable Management Practices and Digitalisation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-20, May.
    2. Iselborn, Maximilian & Müller Loose, Simone & Kühl, Rainer, 2016. "Produktionsstrategische Erfolgsfaktoren Veredelnder Weinbaubetriebe," 56th Annual Conference, Bonn, Germany, September 28-30, 2016 244803, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    3. Rüdiger, Jens & Kerpen, Marie-Luise & Hanf, Jon H., 2016. "Winzergenossenschaften Im Kontext Des Weintourismus," 56th Annual Conference, Bonn, Germany, September 28-30, 2016 244868, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liang, Qiao & Hendrikse, George, 2016. "Pooling and the yardstick effect of cooperatives," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 97-105.
    2. Iselborn, M. & Jungbluth, L. & Hanf, J.H., 2015. "Probleme des Qualitätsmanagements bei Winzergenossenschaften," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 50, March.
    3. Höhler, Julia & Hildenbrand, Andreas, 2015. "Weinqualität in unterschiedlichen Organisationsformen: Warum schneiden Genossenschaften oft schlechter ab?," 55th Annual Conference, Giessen, Germany, September 23-25, 2015 209256, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    4. Susana López‐Bayón & Marta Fernández‐Barcala & Manuel González‐Díaz, 2020. "In search of agri‐food quality for wine: Is it enough to join a geographical indication?," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(4), pages 568-590, October.
    5. Li, Kai & Zhou, Jie-hong & Liang, Qiao & Huang, Zuhui, 2015. "Food safety controls and governance structure varieties in China's vegetable and fruit sector," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 212046, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Pennerstorfer, Dieter & Weiss, Christoph R., 2011. "Do Cooperatives Offer High Quality Products? Theory and Empirical Evidence from the Wine Market," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 115741, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Stefano Castriota, 2018. "Does Excellence Pay Off? Evidence from the Wine Market," BEMPS - Bozen Economics & Management Paper Series BEMPS49, Faculty of Economics and Management at the Free University of Bozen.
    8. Schamel, G., 2018. "Grape Supply and Implicit Prices for Wine Quality Attributes," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277043, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. López-Bayón, Susana & González-Díaz, Manuel & Solís-Rodríguez, Vanesa & Fernández-Barcala, Marta, 2018. "Governance decisions in the supply chain and quality performance: The synergistic effect of geographical indications and ownership structure," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 1-12.
    10. Deng, Wendong & Hendrikse, George, 2014. "Social capital and incentives in the provision of product quality by cooperatives," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182687, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    11. Bhuyan, Sanjib & Royer, Jeffrey S., 1992. "Cooperative Incentives for Vertical Integration: The Bilateral Monopoly Case," 1992 Annual Meeting, August 9-12, Baltimore, Maryland 271391, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    12. A. M. Hind, 1994. "Cooperatives – Under Performers By Nature? An Exploratory Analysis Of Cooperative And Non‐Cooperative Companies In The Agri‐Business Sector," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(2), pages 213-219, May.
    13. Roy, Devesh & Thorat, Amit, 2008. "Success in High Value Horticultural Export Markets for the Small Farmers: The Case of Mahagrapes in India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 1874-1890, October.
    14. Valentinov, Vladislav & Iliopoulos, Constantine, 2012. "Property Rights Problems in Agricultural Cooperatives: A Heterodox Institutionalist Perspective," Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, vol. 61(3).
    15. Thembi Xaba & Nyankomo Marwa & Babita Mathur-Helm, 2018. "Efficiency and Profitability Analysis of Agricultural Cooperatives in Mpumalanga, South Africa," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 10(6), pages 1-10.
    16. Samuel Garrido, 2022. "The Fruit of Regulation: Wine, Regulations, Subsidies, Quality and Cooperatives in Franco's Spain and Beyond," Documentos de Trabajo (DT-AEHE) 2204, Asociación Española de Historia Económica.
    17. Fischer, Martin L. & Hammond, Jerome W. & Dahl, Dale C., 1981. "Impacts Of Farm Supply Cooperatives On Oligopolistic Farm Input Markets: A Theoretical Analysis," Staff Papers 13746, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    18. Cotterill, Ronald W., 1997. "The Performance of Agricultural Marketing Cooperatives in Differentiated Product Markets," Journal of Cooperatives, NCERA-210, vol. 12, pages 1-13.
    19. Asproudis, Elias & Filippiadis, Eleftherios, 2021. "Bargaining for Community Fishing Quotas," MPRA Paper 107409, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Yildiz, Özgür & Rommel, Jens & Debor, Sarah & Holstenkamp, Lars & Mey, Franziska & Müller, Jakob R. & Radtke, Jörg & Rognli, Judith, 2014. "Research Perspectives on Renewable Energy Cooperatives in Germany: Empirical Insights and Theoretical Lenses," MPRA Paper 55931, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Farm Management;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:gewi15:209190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gewisea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.