IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sgh/gosnar/y2018i1p159-181.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tworzenie jednolitego rynku usług telekomunikacyjnych w Unii Europejskiej

Author

Listed:
  • Maciej Czaplewski

Abstract

Celem artykułu jest dokonanie charakterystyki i oceny dotychczas podjętych działań służących tworzeniu jednolitego cyfrowego rynku usług telekomunikacyjnych Unii Europejskiej (JC RUT UE) oraz zaproponowanie rozwiązań sprzyjających doskonaleniu realizowanego procesu tworzenia tego rynku. Artykuł ma charakter koncepcyjny i wykorzystuje krytyczną analizę krajowej i obcojęzycznej literatury przedmiotu, opracowań wykonanych przez instytuty europejskie w ramach programów badawczych zleconych przez UE oraz aktów prawnych i dokumentów unijnych. Pozwoliło to stwierdzić, że organy UE dążąc do tworzenia JC RUT skoncentrowały uwagę na regulacji sieciowej infrastruktury komunikacyjnej. Biorąc pod uwagę główne trendy rozwojowe dotyczące tych sieci, skupiły swoje działania na rozwiązywaniu kwestii roamingu, gospodarowania częstotliwościami i na neutralności sieci. Pozwoliło też dostrzec, że podejmowane przez organy UE działania służące tworzeniu JC RUT nie w każdym obszarze przebiegają jednakowo sprawnie. Precyzyjnie uregulowany został jedynie temat roamingu. Spostrzeżenia te stały się podstawą do sformułowania wniosków, iż stworzenie JC RUT UE przede wszystkim wymaga wypracowania ogólnie obowiązujących unijnych regulacji dotyczących rozdziału i przyznawania częstotliwości oraz neutralności sieci. Wskazano również, że dla stworzenia takiego rynku niezbędne będzie wypracowanie ogólnounijnych uregulowań dotyczących ochrony danych i ochrony konsumentów korzystających z dóbr cyfrowych. Wnioski te mogą służyć dalszym analizom teoretycznym, jak i być poddawane operacjonalizacji na potrzeby badań empirycznych.

Suggested Citation

  • Maciej Czaplewski, 2018. "Tworzenie jednolitego rynku usług telekomunikacyjnych w Unii Europejskiej," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 1, pages 159-181.
  • Handle: RePEc:sgh:gosnar:y:2018:i:1:p:159-181
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.journalssystem.com/gna/pdf-100573-32413
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jacint Jordana & David Levi-Faur (ed.), 2004. "The Politics of Regulation," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 3167.
    2. Oecd, 2016. "New Forms of Work in the Digital Economy," OECD Digital Economy Papers 260, OECD Publishing.
    3. Oecd, 2016. "Managing Digital Security and Privacy Risk," OECD Digital Economy Papers 254, OECD Publishing.
    4. Colin Scott, 2004. "Regulation in the Age of Governance: The Rise of the Post-Regulatory State," Chapters, in: Jacint Jordana & David Levi-Faur (ed.), The Politics of Regulation, chapter 7, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Moldovanu, Benny & Ewerhart II, Christian, 2001. "The German UMTS Design: Insights From Multi-Object Auction Theory," Sonderforschungsbereich 504 Publications 02-05, Sonderforschungsbereich 504, Universität Mannheim;Sonderforschungsbereich 504, University of Mannheim.
    6. Heidrun C. Hoppe & Philippe Jehiel & Benny Moldovanu, 2006. "License Auctions and Market Structure," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(2), pages 371-396, June.
    7. Dewenter, Ralf & Haucap, Justus & Heimeshoff, Ulrich, 2007. "Regulatorische Risiken in Telekommunikationsmaerkten aus institutionenoekonomischer Perspektive," Working Paper 64/2007, Helmut Schmidt University, Hamburg.
    8. McGuire, Thomas G. & Riordan, Michael H., 1995. "Incomplete information and optimal market structure public purchases from private providers," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 125-141, January.
    9. Janssen,Maarten (ed.), 2004. "Auctioning Public Assets," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521537575.
    10. Janssen,Maarten (ed.), 2004. "Auctioning Public Assets," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521830591.
    11. Oecd, 2016. "New Skills for the Digital Economy: Measuring the demand and supply of ICT skills at work," OECD Digital Economy Papers 258, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Agnieszka Budziewicz-Guźlecka & Kamila Schneider, 2023. "Restructuring Changes in the Energy Sector in the Context of the Green Economy," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 916-923.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jehiel, Philippe & Moldovanu, Benny, 2005. "Allocative and Informational Externalities in Auctions and Related Mechanisms," Discussion Paper Series of SFB/TR 15 Governance and the Efficiency of Economic Systems 142, Free University of Berlin, Humboldt University of Berlin, University of Bonn, University of Mannheim, University of Munich.
    2. Nersessian, David, 2018. "The law and ethics of big data analytics: A new role for international human rights in the search for global standards," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(6), pages 845-854.
    3. Onur A. Koska & Ilke Onur & Frank Stähler, 2018. "The scope of auctions in the presence of downstream interactions and information externalities," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 125(2), pages 107-136, October.
    4. Arno Städtler, 2016. "Leasing Shows Stronger Growth than Fixed Asset Investment – Dynamic Expected to Weaken in 2017," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 69(23), pages 52-63, December.
    5. Song, Quanyun & Li, Jie & Wu, Yu & Yin, Zhichao, 2020. "Accessibility of financial services and household consumption in China: Evidence from micro data," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    6. Gert Brunekreeft & David Newbery, 2006. "Should merchant transmission investment be subject to a must-offer provision?," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 233-260, November.
    7. Morrisson Kaunda Mutuku & Stephen M. A. Muathe, 2020. "Nexus Analysis: Internet of Things and Business Performance," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 9(4), pages 175-181, July.
    8. Oliver Bruttel, 2005. "Are Employment Zones Successful? Evidence From the First Four Years," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 20(4), pages 389-403, November.
    9. Paul Klemperer, 2007. "Bidding Markets," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 3(1), pages 1-47.
    10. Axel Ockenfels & David Reiley & Abdolkarim Sadrieh, 2006. "Online Auctions," NBER Working Papers 12785, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Leandro Arozamena & Nicholas Shunda & Federico Weinschelbaum, 2014. "Optimal nondiscriminatory auctions with favoritism," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 34(1), pages 252-262.
    12. Alberto Cavaliere & Valentina Giust & Mario Maggi, 2011. "Efficient Mechanisms for Access to Storage with Imperfect Competition in Gas Markets," Quaderni di Dipartimento 151, University of Pavia, Department of Economics and Quantitative Methods.
    13. Ning Sun & Zaifu Yang, 2014. "An Efficient and Incentive Compatible Dynamic Auction for Multiple Complements," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 122(2), pages 422-466.
    14. Mats A. Bergman & Johan Lundberg & Sofia Lundberg & Johan Y. Stake, 2020. "Interactions Across Firms and Bid Rigging," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 56(1), pages 107-130, February.
    15. Carvalho, Bruno & Rondon, Rodrigo & Marques, Rui Cunha, 2020. "Better utility regulation through RIA? Merits and implications based on the Brazilian case," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    16. Isaac, R. Mark & Salmon, Timothy C. & Zillante, Arthur, 2007. "A theory of jump bidding in ascending auctions," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 144-164, January.
    17. Matteucci, Nicola, 2021. "Procuring NGA infrastructure: The performance of EMAT auctions in Italy," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1).
    18. Rey, Patrick & Salant, David, 2017. "Allocating essential inputs," TSE Working Papers 17-820, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), revised Jun 2019.
    19. Stefan Weishaar, 2007. "CO 2 emission allowance allocation mechanisms, allocative efficiency and the environment: a static and dynamic perspective," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 29-70, August.
    20. Kang, Chao-Chung & Lee, Tsun-Siou & Huang, Szu-Chi, 2013. "Royalty bargaining in Public–Private Partnership projects: Insights from a theoretic three-stage game auction model," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1-14.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    jednolity rynek usług telekomunikacyjnych; gospodarka cyfrowa; Unia Europejska;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D47 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Market Design
    • L96 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Telecommunications

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sgh:gosnar:y:2018:i:1:p:159-181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Grzegorz Konat (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sgwawpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.