IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/inrsre/v20y1997i1-2p53-75.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Empirical Evaluation of the Aggregated Spatial Choice Model

Author

Listed:
  • Mark R. Ferguson

    (Department of Geography, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8S 4KI, markj@tpolk.ca)

  • Pavlos S. Kanaroglou

    (Department of Geography, McMaster University Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8S 4KI, pavlos@mcmaster.ca)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the performance and capabilities of the aggregated spatial choice model with empirical data. The application is to a problem of Canadian interregional migration in the 1990-91 time period. The strength of the aggregated model is its ability to capture the role of elemental processes in defining the attractiveness of aggregate spatial units without knowledge of elemental choices. The theory of the aggregated model has been discussed in the discrete choice literature. Applications of the model, however, have been very limited in number, while the model in its complete form has never been applied. The application intends to demonstrate the use of the model in the spatial context. The idea that the spatial resolutions of attribute and choice data do not need to be identical can address the aggregation difficulties often inherent in spatial choice problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark R. Ferguson & Pavlos S. Kanaroglou, 1997. "An Empirical Evaluation of the Aggregated Spatial Choice Model," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 20(1-2), pages 53-75, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:inrsre:v:20:y:1997:i:1-2:p:53-75
    DOI: 10.1177/016001769702000104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/016001769702000104
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/016001769702000104?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Siim Soot & Ashish Sen, 1991. "A Spatial Employment And Economic Development Model," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(2), pages 149-166, April.
    2. Mark R. Ferguson & Pavlos S. Kanaroglou, 1995. "Utility Variability within Aggregate Spatial Units and its Relevance to Discrete Models of Destination Choice," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Luc Anselin & Raymond J. G. M. Florax (ed.), New Directions in Spatial Econometrics, chapter 11, pages 243-269, Springer.
    3. DaVanzo, Julie, 1978. "Does Unemployment Affect Migration?-Evidence from Micro Data," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 60(4), pages 504-514, November.
    4. Quigley, John M., 1985. "Consumer choice of dwelling, neighborhood and public services," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 41-63, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. M. K. Haener & P. C. Boxall & W. L. Adamowicz & D. H. Kuhnke, 2004. "Aggregation Bias in Recreation Site Choice Models: Resolving the Resolution Problem," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 80(4).
    2. Yip, Arthur H.C. & Michalek, Jeremy J. & Whitefoot, Kate S., 2018. "On the implications of using composite vehicles in choice model prediction," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 163-188.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eymann, Angelika & Ronning, Gerd, 1996. "Microeconometric models of tourists' destination choise," Tübinger Diskussionsbeiträge 84, University of Tübingen, School of Business and Economics.
    2. Eymann, Angelika & Ronning, Gerd, 1997. "Microeconometric models of tourists' destination choice," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 735-761, November.
    3. Laila Touhami Morghem & Khawlah Ali Abdalla Spetan, 2020. "Determinants of International Migration: An Applied Study on Selected Arab Countries (1995-2017)," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 10(2), pages 6-19.
    4. Patrick Bayer & Fernando Ferreira & Robert McMillan, 2007. "A Unified Framework for Measuring Preferences for Schools and Neighborhoods," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 115(4), pages 588-638, August.
    5. Kristiina Huttunen & Jarle Møen & Kjell G. Salvanes, 2018. "Job Loss and Regional Mobility," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 36(2), pages 479-509.
    6. Harris, G.T., 1985. "A Note on Rural Unemployment: A Study of Four Northern New South Wales Towns," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 53(02), pages 1-11, August.
    7. Banzhaf, H. Spencer, 2002. "Quality Adjustment for Spatially-Delineated Public Goods: Theory and Application to Cost-of-Living Indices in Los Angeles," RFF Working Paper Series dp-02-10-, Resources for the Future.
    8. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Tobias D. Ketterer, 2012. "Do Local Amenities Affect The Appeal Of Regions In Europe For Migrants?," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(4), pages 535-561, October.
    9. Jennifer Hunt, 2004. "Are migrants more skilled than non-migrants? Repeat, return, and same-employer migrants," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 37(4), pages 830-849, November.
    10. Ioannides, Yannis M. & Zabel, Jeffrey E., 2008. "Interactions, neighborhood selection and housing demand," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 229-252, January.
    11. Peter Berck & Sofia Tano & Olle Westerlund, 2016. "Regional Sorting of Human Capital: The Choice of Location among Young Adults in Sweden," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(5), pages 757-770, May.
    12. Simon Winter, 2020. "“It’s the Economy, Stupid!”: On the Relative Impact of Political and Economic Determinants on Migration," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 39(2), pages 207-252, April.
    13. Ye Seul Choi & Up Lim, 2015. "Effects of Regional Creative Milieu on Interregional Migration of the Highly Educated in Korea: Evidence from Hierarchical Cross-Classified Linear Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-18, December.
    14. Deng, Yongheng & Ross, Stephen L. & Wachter, Susan M., 2003. "Racial differences in homeownership: the effect of residential location," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 517-556, September.
    15. Hubert Jayet, 1996. "L'analyse économique des migrations, une synthèse critique," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 47(2), pages 193-226.
    16. Jorge González-Chapela & Raquel Ortega-Lapiedra, 2021. "Reform of the Personal Income Tax in Spain: Effects on Internal Mobility of the Unemployed," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 42(1), pages 166-181, March.
    17. Sewin Chan, 1998. "Spatial Lock-in: Do Falling House Prices Constrain Residential Mobility?," Departmental Working Papers 199816, Rutgers University, Department of Economics.
    18. Birgitta Rabe & Mark P. Taylor, 2012. "Differences in Opportunities? Wage, Employment and House-Price Effects on Migration," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 74(6), pages 831-855, December.
    19. Florian Lehmer & Joachim MOLler, 2008. "Group-specific Effects of Inter-regional Mobility on Earnings - A Microdata Analysis for Germany," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(5), pages 657-674.
    20. Alfred Nucci & Charles Tolbert & Troy Blanchard & Michael Irwin, 2002. "Leaving Home: Modeling the Effect of Civic and Economic Structure on Individual Migration Patterns," Working Papers 02-16, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:inrsre:v:20:y:1997:i:1-2:p:53-75. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.