IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i16p12431-d1218138.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Influence of Environmental Protection Tax Law on Urban Land Green Use Efficiency in China: The Nonlinear Moderating Effect of Tax Rate Increase

Author

Listed:
  • Cheng Peng

    (College of Water Resource and Hydropower, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China)

  • Lu Zhao

    (College of Water Resource and Hydropower, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China)

  • Liwen Liu

    (College of Water Resource and Hydropower, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
    China Three Gorges Construction Engineering Corporation, Chengdu 610065, China)

  • Jia Chen

    (School of Economics and Management, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China)

Abstract

Due to the basic carrier function of land, the economic and ecological effects of Environmental Protection Tax Law (EPTL) will be reflected in the land use. Therefore, this article investigates the effect of EPTL on land green use efficiency (LGUE). To be specific, based on the panel data of 278 prefecture-level cities in China from 2012 to 2020, LGUE is evaluated through a global super efficiency epsilon-based measure (EBM) with unexpected output. Then, the reform of “sewage fee-to-tax” is regarded as a natural experiment to accurately evaluate the effect of EPTL on LGUE. The result that the implementation of EPTL significantly drives LGUE is confirmed. The mechanism tests show that the implementation of EPTL enhances the intensity of green innovation, promotes the optimization of industrial structure, and thereby improves LGUE. Moreover, we find that the moderating effect of tax rate increase is nonlinear and exhibits an inverted U-shape. That is, below a certain value, the tax rate increase will strengthen the EPTL’s ability to improve LGUE. However, after exceeding the value, the tax rate increase will weaken the EPTL’s ability to improve LGUE. Targeted suggestions are proposed for improving the environmental protection tax system and LGUE.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheng Peng & Lu Zhao & Liwen Liu & Jia Chen, 2023. "The Influence of Environmental Protection Tax Law on Urban Land Green Use Efficiency in China: The Nonlinear Moderating Effect of Tax Rate Increase," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-18, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12431-:d:1218138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12431/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12431/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mingyue Wang & Yingming Li & Zitong Wang & Junqiang Li, 2022. "The Heterogeneous Relationship between Pollution Charges and Enterprise Green Technology Innovation, Based on the Data of Chinese Industrial Enterprises," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Suyu Huang & Hanlian Lin & Yongjunbei Zhou & Haonan Ji & Naiping Zhu, 2022. "The Influence of the Policy of Replacing Environmental Protection Fees with Taxes on Enterprise Green Innovation—Evidence from China’s Heavily Polluting Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-23, June.
    3. Jiansheng You & Guohan Ding & Liyuan Zhang, 2022. "Heterogeneous Dynamic Correlation Research among Industrial Structure Distortion, Two-Way FDI and Carbon Emission Intensity in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-23, July.
    4. Xie, Rui & Yao, Siling & Han, Feng & Zhang, Qi, 2022. "Does misallocation of land resources reduce urban green total factor productivity? An analysis of city-level panel data in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    5. Zhao, Xiaoli & Yin, Haitao & Zhao, Yue, 2015. "Impact of environmental regulations on the efficiency and CO2 emissions of power plants in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 238-247.
    6. Hua Wang & Nlandu Mamingi & Benoit Laplante & Susmita Dasgupta, 2003. "Incomplete Enforcement of Pollution Regulation: Bargaining Power of Chinese Factories," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 24(3), pages 245-262, March.
    7. Singhania, Monica & Saini, Neha, 2021. "Demystifying pollution haven hypothesis: Role of FDI," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 516-528.
    8. Bruce Morley, 2012. "Empirical evidence on the effectiveness of environmental taxes," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(18), pages 1817-1820, December.
    9. Bowen Xiao & Dongxiao Niu & Xiaodan Guo & Xiaomin Xu, 2015. "The Impacts of Environmental Tax in China: A Dynamic Recursive Multi-Sector CGE Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-28, July.
    10. Tang, Pengcheng & Yang, Shuxiang & Yang, Shuwang, 2020. "How to design corporate governance structures to enhance corporate social responsibility in China's mining state-owned enterprises?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    11. Siyu Ren & Yu Hao & Haitao Wu, 2022. "How Does Green Investment Affect Environmental Pollution? Evidence from China," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 81(1), pages 25-51, January.
    12. Jiayu Wang & Ke Wang & Xunpeng Shi & Yi-Ming Wei, 2019. "Spatial heterogeneity and driving forces of environmental productivity growth in China: Would it help to switch pollutant discharge fees to environmental taxes?," CEEP-BIT Working Papers 123, Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research (CEEP), Beijing Institute of Technology.
    13. Tiba, Sofien & Omri, Anis, 2017. "Literature survey on the relationships between energy, environment and economic growth," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 1129-1146.
    14. Bovenberg, A. Lans & Goulder, Lawrence H., 1997. "Costs of Environmentally Motivated Taxes in the Presence of Other Taxes: General Equilibrium Analyses," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 50(1), pages 59-88, March.
    15. Tan, Shukui & Hu, Bixia & Kuang, Bing & Zhou, Min, 2021. "Regional differences and dynamic evolution of urban land green use efficiency within the Yangtze River Delta, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    16. Manru Peng & Chendie Wei & Youliang Jin & Hangxin Ran, 2023. "Does the Environmental Tax Reform Positively Impact Corporate Environmental Performance?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-19, May.
    17. Liu, Guixian & Sun, Wei & Kong, Zhaoyang & Dong, Xiucheng & Jiang, Qingzhe, 2023. "Did the pollution charge system promote or inhibit innovation? Evidence from Chinese micro-enterprises," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    18. Soocheol Lee & Unnada Chewpreecha & Hector Pollitt & Satoshi Kojima, 2018. "An economic assessment of carbon tax reform to meet Japan’s NDC target under different nuclear assumptions using the E3ME model," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 20(2), pages 411-429, April.
    19. Bovenberg, A. Lans & Goulder, Lawrence H., 1997. "Costs of Environmentally Motivated Taxes in the Presence of Other Taxes: General Equilibrium Analyses," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association, vol. 50(1), pages 59-88, March.
    20. Zhao, Aiwu & Wang, Jingyi & Sun, Zhenzhen & Guan, Hongjun, 2022. "Environmental taxes, technology innovation quality and firm performance in China—A test of effects based on the Porter hypothesis," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 309-325.
    21. Yingkai Tang & Kun Wang & Xuanming Ji & He Xu & Yangqing Xiao, 2021. "Assessment and Spatial-Temporal Evolution Analysis of Urban Land Use Efficiency under Green Development Orientation: Case of the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomerations," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
    22. Dong, Kangyin & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Zhao, Jun, 2022. "How do pollution fees affect environmental quality in China?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    23. Peng Wang & Zinan Shao & Jian Wang & Qun Wu, 2021. "The impact of land finance on urban land use efficiency: A panel threshold model for Chinese provinces," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(1), pages 310-331, March.
    24. Hao Su & Shuo Yang, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Urban Land Green Use Efficiency under Carbon Emission Constraints in the Yellow River Basin, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-28, October.
    25. Aurelia Rybak & Jarosław Joostberens & Anna Manowska & Joachim Pielot, 2022. "The Impact of Environmental Taxes on the Level of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Poland and Sweden," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-15, June.
    26. Biao Hu & Hongjia Dong & Ping Jiang & Jingan Zhu, 2020. "Analysis of the Applicable Rate of Environmental Tax through Different Tax Rate Scenarios in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-14, May.
    27. Kun Ge & Shan Zou & Shangan Ke & Danling Chen, 2021. "Does Urban Agglomeration Promote Urban Land Green Use Efficiency? Take the Yangtze River Economic Zone of China as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-19, September.
    28. Celil Aydin & Ömer Esen, 2018. "Reducing CO2 emissions in the EU member states: Do environmental taxes work?," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(13), pages 2396-2420, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beata Zofia Filipiak & Dorota Wyszkowska, 2022. "Determinants of Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions in European Union Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-24, December.
    2. Teresa Famulska & Jan Kaczmarzyk & Małgorzata Grząba-Włoszek, 2022. "Environmental Taxes in the Member States of the European Union—Trends in Energy Taxes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-20, November.
    3. Hao Su & Shuo Yang, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Urban Land Green Use Efficiency under Carbon Emission Constraints in the Yellow River Basin, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-28, October.
    4. Zhe Yang & Zhenwu Xiong & Wenhao Xue & Yuhong Zhou, 2022. "The Impact of Pollution Fee Reform on the Emission of Water Pollutants: Evidence from Manufacturing Enterprises in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-17, August.
    5. Zheng, Shiming & Yao, Rongrong & Zou, Ke, 2022. "Provincial environmental inequality in China: Measurement, influence, and policy instrument choice," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    6. Lingxiao Zhao & Yunpeng Tang & Yan Liu, 2023. "How Does Environmental Tax Influence the Scale and Efficiency of Green Investment among China’s Heavily Polluting Enterprises?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-26, October.
    7. Parry, Ian W. H., 2002. "Funding transportation spending in metropolitan Washington, DC: the costs of alternative revenue sources," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 362-390, September.
    8. Abudureheman, Maliyamu & Jiang, Qingzhe & Dong, Xiucheng & Dong, Cong, 2022. "Spatial effects of dynamic comprehensive energy efficiency on CO2 reduction in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    9. Axel Dreher, 2002. "Does Globalization Affect Growth?," Development and Comp Systems 0210004, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 16 Jun 2003.
    10. Parry, Ian W. H. & Williams III, Roberton C., 1999. "A second-best evaluation of eight policy instruments to reduce carbon emissions," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(3-4), pages 347-373, August.
    11. Aldy, Joseph E. & Ley, Eduardo & Parry, Ian, 2008. "A Tax–Based Approach to Slowing Global Climate Change," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 61(3), pages 493-517, September.
    12. A. Lans Bovenberg & Lawrence H. Goulder, 2001. "Neutralizing the Adverse Industry Impacts of CO2 Abatement Policies: What Does It Cost?," NBER Chapters, in: Behavioral and Distributional Effects of Environmental Policy, pages 45-90, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. Xie, Peijun & Jamaani, Fouad, 2022. "Does green innovation, energy productivity and environmental taxes limit carbon emissions in developed economies: Implications for sustainable development," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 66-78.
    14. Bhatia, Kul B, 1998. "Tax Incidence with Three Goods and Two Primary Factors: Theory and Applications," Public Finance = Finances publiques, , vol. 53(2), pages 123-144.
    15. Takeda, Shiro, 2007. "The double dividend from carbon regulations in Japan," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 336-364, September.
    16. Parry, Ian, 2001. "How Should Metropolitan Washington, D.C., Finance Its Transportation Deficit?," RFF Working Paper Series dp-01-12, Resources for the Future.
    17. Kancs, d'Artis & Wohlgemuth, Norbert, 2008. "Evaluation of renewable energy policies in an integrated economic-energy-environment model," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 128-139, January.
    18. A. Bovenberg, 1999. "Green Tax Reforms and the Double Dividend: an Updated Reader's Guide," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 6(3), pages 421-443, August.
    19. Epanchin-Niell, Rebecca S. & Wilen, James E., 2010. "Optimal control of spatial-dynamic processes: The case of biological invasions," 2010 Annual Meeting, July 25-27, 2010, Denver, Colorado 61375, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    20. Yin Ma & Minrui Zheng & Xinqi Zheng & Yi Huang & Feng Xu & Xiaoli Wang & Jiantao Liu & Yongqiang Lv & Wenchao Liu, 2023. "Land Use Efficiency Assessment under Sustainable Development Goals: A Systematic Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12431-:d:1218138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.