IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i16p12370-d1217195.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Green Technology Research and Development (R&D) Investment on Performance: A Case Study of Listed Energy Companies in Beijing, China

Author

Listed:
  • Piaopeng Song

    (College of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Yuxiao Gu

    (College of Economics & Management, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China)

  • Bin Su

    (Energy Studies Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119620, Singapore)

  • Arifa Tanveer

    (College of Economics & Management, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China)

  • Qiao Peng

    (Group of Information Technology, Analytics & Operations, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT9 5EE, UK)

  • Weijun Gao

    (Faculty of Environmental Engineering, The University of Kitakyushu, Kitakyushu 8080135, Japan
    Innovation Institute for Sustainable Maritime Architecture Research and Technology, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266033, China)

  • Shaomin Wu

    (Kent Business School, University of Kent, Kent CT2 7FS, UK)

  • Shihong Zeng

    (College of Economics & Management, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
    Faculty of Environmental Engineering, The University of Kitakyushu, Kitakyushu 8080135, Japan)

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between green technology R&D investment and corporate performance (ROA) of 44 Beijing-listed energy companies from 2016 to 2021 using a threshold regression model. The results show that there is an inverse W-shaped nonlinear relationship between green technology R&D investment and firm performance. This means that green technology R&D investments only have a positive effect on firm performance within an appropriate green technology R&D investment interval, and a negative effect occurs outside this interval. Additionally, the study analyses the influence of three threshold variables (firm size, capital structure and capital density) on the relationship between green technology R&D investment and firm performance. The results show that firm size has an inversely- U-shaped relationship, the capital structure has a negative nonlinear relationship and the capital density has an inversely N-shaped relationship. Optimal intervals are observed for all three threshold variables. Moreover, the study shows that the green technology R&D investment intensity has a lagged effect on firm performance. The positive influence weakens over time, and the negative influence becomes more pronounced. The findings of the study can help energy companies to develop green technology R&D innovation strategies, such as differentiating green technology R&D expenditures for companies in different development situations. It can also exploit the driving effect of green technology R&D investment on firm performance in the context of China’s energy sector restructuring.

Suggested Citation

  • Piaopeng Song & Yuxiao Gu & Bin Su & Arifa Tanveer & Qiao Peng & Weijun Gao & Shaomin Wu & Shihong Zeng, 2023. "The Impact of Green Technology Research and Development (R&D) Investment on Performance: A Case Study of Listed Energy Companies in Beijing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-24, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12370-:d:1217195
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12370/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12370/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lazzarotti, Valentina & Manzini, Raffaella & Mari, Luca, 2011. "A model for R&D performance measurement," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 212-223, November.
    2. Zhu, Xiaoyang & Asimakopoulos, Stylianos & Kim, Jaebeom, 2020. "Financial development and innovation-led growth: Is too much finance better?," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    3. David J. TEECE, 2008. "Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: The Transfer And Licensing Of Know-How And Intellectual Property Understanding the Multinational Enterprise in the Modern World, chapter 5, pages 67-87, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    4. Wenzhi Zheng & Yuting Lou & Yu Chen, 2019. "On the Unsustainable Macroeconomy with Increasing Inequality of Firms Induced by Excessive Liquidity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-22, May.
    5. Cui, Yu & Khan, Sufyan Ullah & Li, Zhixue & Zhao, Minjuan, 2021. "Environmental effect, price subsidy and financial performance: Evidence from Chinese new energy enterprises," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    6. Ugur, Mehmet & Trushin, Eshref & Solomon, Edna, 2016. "Inverted-U relationship between R&D intensity and survival: Evidence on scale and complementarity effects in UK data," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(7), pages 1474-1492.
    7. Jensen, Michael C, 1986. "Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 76(2), pages 323-329, May.
    8. Srikanth Paruchuri & Micki Eisenman, 2012. "Microfoundations of Firm R&D Capabilities: A Study of Inventor Networks in a Merger," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(8), pages 1509-1535, December.
    9. Miao, Ke & Li, Kunpeng & Su, Liangjun, 2020. "Panel threshold models with interactive fixed effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 219(1), pages 137-170.
    10. Myung Hwan Seo & Sueyoul Kim & Young-Joo Kim, 2019. "Estimation of dynamic panel threshold model using Stata," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 19(3), pages 685-697, September.
    11. Jiyeon Yoo & Sangryul Lee & Sambock Park, 2019. "The Effect of Firm Life Cycle on the Relationship between R&D Expenditures and Future Performance, Earnings Uncertainty, and Sustainable Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, April.
    12. Leung, T.Y. & Sharma, Piyush, 2021. "Differences in the impact of R&D intensity and R&D internationalization on firm performance – Mediating role of innovation performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 81-91.
    13. Wang, Chengqi & Yi, Jingtao & Kafouros, Mario & Yan, Yanni, 2015. "Under what institutional conditions do business groups enhance innovation performance?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 694-702.
    14. Su, Cong & Kong, Lingshuang & Ciabuschi, Francesco & Holm, Ulf, 2020. "Demand and willingness for knowledge transfer in springboard subsidiaries of Chinese multinationals," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 297-309.
    15. Huishuang Su & Xintong Qu & Shuo Tian & Qiang Ma & Ling Li & Yong Chen, 2022. "Artificial intelligence empowerment: The impact of research and development investment on green radical innovation in high‐tech enterprises," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3), pages 489-502, May.
    16. Kalon Si & Xin Long Xu & Hsing Hung Chen, 2020. "Examining the Interactive Endogeneity Relationship between R&D Investment and Financially Sustainable Performance: Comparison from Different Types of Energy Enterprises," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, May.
    17. Hansen, Bruce E., 1999. "Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing, and inference," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 93(2), pages 345-368, December.
    18. Federica Bianco & Marica Venezia, 2019. "Features of R&D Teams and Innovation Performances of Sustainable Firms: Evidence from the “Sustainability Pioneers” in the IT Hardware Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-19, August.
    19. Mohsen Brahmi & Luca Esposito & Anna Parziale & Karambir Singh Dhayal & Shruti Agrawal & Arun Kumar Giri & Nguyen Thi Loan, 2023. "The Role of Greener Innovations in Promoting Financial Inclusion to Achieve Carbon Neutrality: An Integrative Review," Economies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, July.
    20. Graham, John R. & Harvey, Campbell R. & Rajgopal, Shiva, 2005. "The economic implications of corporate financial reporting," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(1-3), pages 3-73, December.
    21. Qing Cao & Eric Gedajlovic & Hongping Zhang, 2009. "Unpacking Organizational Ambidexterity: Dimensions, Contingencies, and Synergistic Effects," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 781-796, August.
    22. Guo, Hao & Minier, Jenny, 2021. "Borders, geography, and economic activity: The case of China," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    23. Cui, Qiang & Wei, Yi-Ming & Li, Ye, 2016. "Exploring the impacts of the EU ETS emission limits on airline performance via the Dynamic Environmental DEA approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 984-994.
    24. Manzhi Liu & Liyuan Liu & Shichun Xu & Mingwei Du & Xianxian Liu & Yanqin Zhang, 2019. "The Influences of Government Subsidies on Performance of New Energy Firms: A Firm Heterogeneity Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-20, August.
    25. Zhang, Huiming & Li, Lianshui & Zhou, Dequn & Zhou, Peng, 2014. "Political connections, government subsidies and firm financial performance: Evidence from renewable energy manufacturing in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 330-336.
    26. Lin, Bou-Wen & Lee, Yikuan & Hung, Shih-Chang, 2006. "R&D intensity and commercialization orientation effects on financial performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(6), pages 679-685, June.
    27. Serhiy Zabolotnyy & Mirosław Wasilewski, 2019. "The Concept of Financial Sustainability Measurement: A Case of Food Companies from Northern Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-16, September.
    28. Vithessonthi, Chaiporn & Racela, Olimpia C., 2016. "Short- and long-run effects of internationalization and R&D intensity on firm performance," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 28-45.
    29. Geoffrey P. Martin & Robert M. Wiseman & Luis R. Gomez-Mejia, 2016. "Going short-term or long-term? CEO stock options and temporal orientation in the presence of slack," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(12), pages 2463-2480, December.
    30. Zhu, Zhishuang & Liao, Hua & Liu, Li, 2021. "The role of public energy R&D in energy conservation and transition: Experiences from IEA countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    31. Hurtado-Torres, Nuria E. & Aragón-Correa, J. Alberto & Ortiz-de-Mandojana, Natalia, 2018. "How does R&D internationalization in multinational firms affect their innovative performance? The moderating role of international collaboration in the energy industry," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 514-527.
    32. Xiong, Xi & Yang, Guo-liang & Guan, Zhong-cheng, 2018. "Assessing R&D efficiency using a two-stage dynamic DEA model: A case study of research institutes in the Chinese Academy of Sciences," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 784-805.
    33. Zabala, Aiora & Pascual, Unai & García-Barrios, Luis, 2017. "Payments for Pioneers? Revisiting the Role of External Rewards for Sustainable Innovation under Heterogeneous Motivations," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 234-245.
    34. Ming-Liang Yeh & Hsiao-Ping Chu & Peter Sher & Yi-Chia Chiu, 2010. "R&D intensity, firm performance and the identification of the threshold: fresh evidence from the panel threshold regression model," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(3), pages 389-401.
    35. Cui, Qiang & Li, Ye, 2017. "Airline efficiency measures using a Dynamic Epsilon-Based Measure model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 121-134.
    36. Chang, Shuhua & Li, Yue & Gao, Fanglu, 2016. "The impact of delaying an investment decision on R&D projects in real option game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 182-189.
    37. Chen, Ling & Yang, Wenhui, 2019. "R&D tax credits and firm innovation: Evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 233-241.
    38. Ruiqi, Wang & Wang, Fangjun & Xu, Luying & Yuan, Changhong, 2017. "R&D expenditures, ultimate ownership and future performance: Evidence from China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 47-54.
    39. Xiuli Sun, 2022. "Human Capital, Market Environment, and Firm Innovation in Chinese Manufacturing Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, October.
    40. Patel, Pankaj C. & Guedes, Maria João & Soares, Nuno & da Conceição Gonçalves, Vítor, 2018. "Strength of the association between R&D volatility and firm growth: The roles of corporate governance and tangible asset volatility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 282-288.
    41. Mudambi, Ram & Swift, Tim, 2011. "Proactive R&D management and firm growth: A punctuated equilibrium model," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 429-440, April.
    42. Sharma, Piyush & Davcik, Nebojsa S. & Pillai, Kishore Gopalakrishna, 2016. "Product innovation as a mediator in the impact of R&D expenditure and brand equity on marketing performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 5662-5669.
    43. Alam, Ashraful & Uddin, Moshfique & Yazdifar, Hassan & Shafique, Sujana & Lartey, Theophilus, 2020. "R&D investment, firm performance and moderating role of system and safeguard: Evidence from emerging markets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 94-105.
    44. Martin Falk, 2012. "Quantile estimates of the impact of R&D intensity on firm performance," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 19-37, July.
    45. Ciftci, Mustafa & Cready, William M., 2011. "Scale effects of R&D as reflected in earnings and returns," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 62-80, June.
    46. Adomako, Samuel & Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph & Danso, Albert & Danquah, Joseph Kwadwo & Hussain, Zahid & Khan, Zaheer, 2021. "R&D intensity, knowledge creation process and new product performance: The mediating role of international R&D teams," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 719-727.
    47. Liu, Dayong & Chen, Tong & Liu, Xiaoyang & Yu, Yongze, 2019. "Do more subsidies promote greater innovation? Evidence from the Chinese electronic manufacturing industry," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 441-452.
    48. Hanyuan Liang & Guangliang Li & Weikun Zhang & Zhe Chen, 2022. "The Impact of Green Innovation on Enterprise Performance: The Regulatory Role of Government Grants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    49. James, Barclay E. & McGuire, Jean B., 2016. "Transactional-institutional fit: Corporate governance of R&D investment in different institutional contexts," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3478-3486.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rui Wang & Yi-Na Li & Jiuchang Wei, 2022. "Growing in the changing global landscape: the intangible resources and performance of high-tech corporates," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 39(3), pages 999-1022, September.
    2. Alam, Ashraful & Uddin, Moshfique & Yazdifar, Hassan & Shafique, Sujana & Lartey, Theophilus, 2020. "R&D investment, firm performance and moderating role of system and safeguard: Evidence from emerging markets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 94-105.
    3. Leung, T.Y. & Sharma, Piyush, 2021. "Differences in the impact of R&D intensity and R&D internationalization on firm performance – Mediating role of innovation performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 81-91.
    4. Qi, Xiaoyan & Guo, Yanshan & Guo, Pibin & Yao, Xilong & Liu, Xiuli, 2022. "Do subsidies and R&D investment boost energy transition performance? Evidence from Chinese renewable energy firms," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    5. Adomako, Samuel & Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph & Danso, Albert & Danquah, Joseph Kwadwo & Hussain, Zahid & Khan, Zaheer, 2021. "R&D intensity, knowledge creation process and new product performance: The mediating role of international R&D teams," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 719-727.
    6. Kalon Si & Xin Long Xu & Hsing Hung Chen, 2020. "Examining the Interactive Endogeneity Relationship between R&D Investment and Financially Sustainable Performance: Comparison from Different Types of Energy Enterprises," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, May.
    7. Chen, Yiqi & Ibhagui, Oyakhilome W., 2019. "R&D-firm performance nexus: New evidence from NASDAQ listed firms," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    8. Bai, Rui & Lin, Boqiang & Liu, Xiying, 2021. "Government subsidies and firm-level renewable energy investment: New evidence from partially linear functional-coefficient models," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    9. Shaikh, Ibrahim & Randhawa, Krithika, 2022. "Managing the risks and motivations of technology managers in open innovation: Bringing stakeholder-centric corporate governance into focus," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    10. Wenke, Kathrin & Zapkau, Florian B. & Schwens, Christian, 2021. "Too small to do it all? A meta-analysis on the relative relationships of exploration, exploitation, and ambidexterity with SME performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 653-665.
    11. Katarzyna Prędkiewicz & Paweł Prędkiewicz, 2014. "The Patents and Financial Performance of Firms - Evidence From Polish Manufacturing Companies," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 10(4), pages 115-141.
    12. Chan, Konan & Lin, Yueh-hsiang & Wang, Yanzhi, 2015. "The information content of R&D reductions," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 131-155.
    13. Cunningham, James A. & Link, Albert N., 2021. "Latent technology as an outcome of R&D," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    14. Xiang, Erwei & Gasbarro, Dominic & Cullen, Grant & Ruan, Wenjuan, 2020. "Does R&D expenditure volatility affect stock return?," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(3).
    15. Mengning He & Raquel Pérez Estébanez, 2023. "Exploring the Relationship between R&D Investment and Business Performance—An Empirical Analysis of Chinese ICT SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, March.
    16. Kwon, He-Boong & Lee, Jooh & Choi, Laee, 2022. "Dynamic interplay of operations and R&D capabilities in U.S. high-tech firms: Predictive impact analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    17. Liu, Shengqiang & Lin, Shu & Sun, Zhaoyu & Yuan, Lihua, 2021. "Earnings management and firms' investment behavior: The threshold effect of ROE," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    18. Chen, Chao & Gu, Junjian & Luo, Rongxi, 2022. "Corporate innovation and R&D expenditure disclosures," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    19. Khémiri, Wafa & Noubbigh, Hédi, 2020. "Size-threshold effect in debt-firm performance nexus in the sub-Saharan region: A Panel Smooth Transition Regression approach," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 335-344.
    20. Massimo Colombo & Annalisa Croce & Samuele Murtinu, 2014. "Ownership structure, horizontal agency costs and the performance of high-tech entrepreneurial firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 265-282, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12370-:d:1217195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.