IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v153y2021icp272-295.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A game theoretic approach to sustainable freight transportation: Competition between road and intermodal road–rail systems with government intervention

Author

Listed:
  • Tamannaei, Mohammad
  • Zarei, Hamid
  • Rasti-Barzoki, Morteza

Abstract

Sustainable freight transportation is a logistics approach that provides affordable services to consumers where environmental, economic, and social sustainability dimensions are concerned. Governments usually improve sustainability dimensions in freight transportation by imposing taxes on transportation systems. Therefore, they should extend their knowledge on interactions between sustainability dimensions and how their interventions affect each dimension. In this regard, we analyze competition between two freight transportation systems in the context of government intervention. These systems include road and intermodal road–rail transportation modes, where the latter is regarded as an environmentally sustainable mode. A sequential game is addressed to analyze the duopoly competition. In the upper level, a government, as a Stackelberg leader, imposes taxes on fuel usage based on environmental, economic, and social concerns. In the lower level, a Nash game is developed to analyze price competition in the transportation market. Our analyses reveal that: (a) Given a fixed level of the consumers' loyalty to their specific transportation systems, economic and social sustainability are consistent with each other, while they conflict with environmental sustainability. (b) Economic risks increase economic sustainability requested by the transportation systems. Such a relationship and the mentioned conflict between environmental and economic sustainability imply that a reduction of economic risks by the government indirectly contributes to environmental sustainability. (c) An increase in the consumers' loyalty simultaneously improves the three sustainability dimensions. (d) The energy efficiency improvements of the transportation systems may pose adverse environmental and social effects, called the rebound effects. Moreover, government intervention effectively eliminates such rebound effects. (e) Government support for the service enhancement of the intermodal system, combined with the national advertisement of this system, may exempt the government from subsidy payment.

Suggested Citation

  • Tamannaei, Mohammad & Zarei, Hamid & Rasti-Barzoki, Morteza, 2021. "A game theoretic approach to sustainable freight transportation: Competition between road and intermodal road–rail systems with government intervention," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 272-295.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:153:y:2021:i:c:p:272-295
    DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2021.09.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019126152100165X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.trb.2021.09.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christine Tawfik & Sabine Limbourg, 2019. "A Bilevel Model for Network Design and Pricing Based on a Level-of-Service Assessment," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(6), pages 1609-1626, November.
    2. Larranaga, Ana Margarita & Arellana, Julian & Senna, Luiz Afonso, 2017. "Encouraging intermodality: A stated preference analysis of freight mode choice in Rio Grande do Sul," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 202-211.
    3. Mancuso, Paolo, 2014. "An analysis of the competition that impinges on the Milan–Rome intercity passenger transport link," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 42-52.
    4. Feng Chen & Xiaopeng Shen & Zijia Wang & Yang Yang, 2017. "An Evaluation of the Low-Carbon Effects of Urban Rail Based on Mode Shifts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-12, March.
    5. Saberi, Sara, 2018. "Sustainable, multiperiod supply chain network model with freight carrier through reduction in pollution stock," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 421-444.
    6. Hubbard, Thomas N, 2001. "Contractual Form and Market Thickness in Trucking," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 32(2), pages 369-386, Summer.
    7. Shah, Nilopa & Brueckner, Jan K., 2012. "Price and frequency competition in freight transportation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(6), pages 938-953.
    8. Adler, Nicole, 2001. "Competition in a deregulated air transportation market," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(2), pages 337-345, March.
    9. S. Chan Choi, 1991. "Price Competition in a Channel Structure with a Common Retailer," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(4), pages 271-296.
    10. Tscharaktschiew, Stefan, 2020. "Why are highway speed limits really justified? An equilibrium speed choice analysis," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 317-351.
    11. Pan, Kewen & Lai, K.K. & Leung, Stephen C.H. & Xiao, Di, 2010. "Revenue-sharing versus wholesale price mechanisms under different channel power structures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(2), pages 532-538, June.
    12. Wang, Hua & Wang, Xinchang & Zhang, Xiaoning, 2017. "Dynamic resource allocation for intermodal freight transportation with network effects: Approximations and algorithms," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 83-112.
    13. Wei, Jie & Zhao, Jing & Li, Yongjian, 2013. "Pricing decisions for complementary products with firms’ different market powers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 224(3), pages 507-519.
    14. Akhmat, Ghulam & Zaman, Khalid & Shukui, Tan & Sajjad, Faiza, 2014. "Does energy consumption contribute to climate change? Evidence from major regions of the world," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 123-134.
    15. Rasti-Barzoki, Morteza & Moon, Ilkyeong, 2020. "A game theoretic approach for car pricing and its energy efficiency level versus governmental sustainability goals by considering rebound effect: A case study of South Korea," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    16. Yuntao Guo & Srinivas Peeta & Fred Mannering, 2016. "Rail-truck multimodal freight collaboration: a statistical analysis of freight-shipper perspectives," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(5), pages 484-506, July.
    17. Mohammad Tamannaei & Hamid Zarei & Sajede Aminzadegan, 2021. "A Game-Theoretic Approach to the Freight Transportation Pricing Problem in the Presence of Intermodal Service Providers in a Competitive Market," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 123-173, March.
    18. de Rus, Ginés & Socorro, M. Pilar, 2014. "Access pricing, infrastructure investment and intermodal competition," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 374-387.
    19. David Austin, 2015. "Pricing Freight Transport to Account for External Costs: Working Paper 2015-03," Working Papers 50049, Congressional Budget Office.
    20. Reis, Vasco & Fabian Meier, J. & Pace, Giuseppe & Palacin, Roberto, 2013. "Rail and multi-modal transport," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 17-30.
    21. Kundu, Tanmoy & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2019. "Analyzing the effect of government subsidy on shippers’ mode switching behavior in the Belt and Road strategic context," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 175-202.
    22. Crainic, Teodor Gabriel & Perboli, Guido & Rosano, Mariangela, 2018. "Simulation of intermodal freight transportation systems: a taxonomy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(2), pages 401-418.
    23. Peter Knippertz & Mat J. Evans & Paul R. Field & Andreas H. Fink & Catherine Liousse & John H. Marsham, 2015. "The possible role of local air pollution in climate change in West Africa," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 5(9), pages 815-822, September.
    24. Wenhua Di & Nathaniel Pattison, 2020. "Distant Lending, Specialization, and Access to Credit," Working Papers 2003, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.
    25. Fenling Feng & Chengguang Liu & Haihong Liu & Zhizhou Ji, 2016. "Research on Price of Railway Freight Based on Low-Carbon Economy," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2016, pages 1-7, March.
    26. Anderson, Edward J. & Bao, Yong, 2010. "Price competition with integrated and decentralized supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 227-234, January.
    27. Kim, Euijune & Hewings, Geoffrey J.D. & Amir, Hidayat, 2017. "Economic evaluation of transportation projects: An application of Financial Computable General Equilibrium model," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 44-55.
    28. Mostafa Parsa & Ali Shahandeh Nookabadi & Zümbül Atan, 2020. "A joint economic lot-size model for sustainable industries of recycled content products," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(24), pages 7439-7470, December.
    29. Karray, Salma & Sigué, Simon Pierre, 2015. "A game-theoretic model for co-promotions: Choosing a complementary versus an independent product ally," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 84-100.
    30. Abel P. Jeuland & Steven M. Shugan, 1983. "Managing Channel Profits," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(3), pages 239-272.
    31. David Besanko & Shana Cui, 2016. "Railway restructuring and organizational choice: network quality and welfare impacts," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 164-206, October.
    32. W. Szeto & Y. Jiang & D. Wang & A. Sumalee, 2015. "A Sustainable Road Network Design Problem with Land Use Transportation Interaction over Time," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 791-822, September.
    33. Christine Tawfik & Sabine Limbourg, 2018. "Pricing Problems in Intermodal Freight Transport: Research Overview and Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, September.
    34. De Borger, Bruno & Mulalic, Ismir, 2012. "The determinants of fuel use in the trucking industry—volume, fleet characteristics and the rebound effect," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 284-295.
    35. Ping Xiao & Ruli Xiao & Yitian (Sky) Liang & Xinlei (Jack) Chen & Wei Lu, 2020. "The Effects of a Government’s Subsidy Program: Accessibility Beyond Affordability," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(7), pages 3211-3233, July.
    36. Xiao, Tiaojun & Yang, Danqin, 2008. "Price and service competition of supply chains with risk-averse retailers under demand uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(1), pages 187-200, July.
    37. Kurata, Hisashi & Yao, Dong-Qing & Liu, John J., 2007. "Pricing policies under direct vs. indirect channel competition and national vs. store brand competition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 180(1), pages 262-281, July.
    38. Wang, Zhaohua & Lu, Milin, 2014. "An empirical study of direct rebound effect for road freight transport in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 274-281.
    39. Santos, Georgina & Behrendt, Hannah & Maconi, Laura & Shirvani, Tara & Teytelboym, Alexander, 2010. "Part I: Externalities and economic policies in road transport," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 2-45.
    40. Demir, Emrah & Huang, Yuan & Scholts, Sebastiaan & Van Woensel, Tom, 2015. "A selected review on the negative externalities of the freight transportation: Modeling and pricing," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 95-114.
    41. Edirisinghe, N.C.P. & Bichescu, B. & Shi, X., 2011. "Equilibrium analysis of supply chain structures under power imbalance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 214(3), pages 568-578, November.
    42. Adler, Nicole & Brudner, Amir & Proost, Stef, 2021. "A review of transport market modeling using game-theoretic principles," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(3), pages 808-829.
    43. Paolo Brunori & Maria Luisa Maitino & Letizia Ravagli & Nicola Sciclone, 2020. "Distant and Unequal. Lockdown and Inequalities in Italy," Working Papers - Economics wp2020_13.rdf, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa.
    44. Zhang, Qi & Wang, Wenyuan & Peng, Yun & Zhang, Junyi & Guo, Zijian, 2018. "A game-theoretical model of port competition on intermodal network and pricing strategy," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 19-39.
    45. Hafezalkotob, Ashkan, 2017. "Competition, cooperation, and coopetition of green supply chains under regulations on energy saving levels," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 228-250.
    46. Mateusz Cichenski & Florian Jaehn & Grzegorz Pawlak & Erwin Pesch & Gaurav Singh & Jacek Blazewicz, 2017. "An integrated model for the transshipment yard scheduling problem," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 57-65, February.
    47. Chen, Xu & Wang, Xiaojun, 2015. "Free or bundled: Channel selection decisions under different power structures," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 11-20.
    48. Demir, Emrah & Burgholzer, Wolfgang & Hrušovský, Martin & Arıkan, Emel & Jammernegg, Werner & Woensel, Tom Van, 2016. "A green intermodal service network design problem with travel time uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PB), pages 789-807.
    49. SteadieSeifi, M. & Dellaert, N.P. & Nuijten, W. & Van Woensel, T. & Raoufi, R., 2014. "Multimodal freight transportation planning: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(1), pages 1-15.
    50. Fahimnia, Behnam & Sarkis, Joseph & Choudhary, Alok & Eshragh, Ali, 2015. "Tactical supply chain planning under a carbon tax policy scheme: A case study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 206-215.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rategh, Yalda & Tamannaei, Mohammad & Zarei, Hamid, 2022. "A game-theoretic approach to an oligopolistic transportation market: Coopetition between incumbent systems subject to the entrance threat of an HSR service," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 144-171.
    2. Jili Kong & Ziyu Chen & Xiaoping Liu, 2022. "A Review of Logistics Pricing Research Based on Game Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-20, August.
    3. Yunlong Liu & Leiyu Chen & Chengfeng Huang, 2022. "A Tripartite Evolutionary Game and Simulation Analysis of Transportation Carbon Emission Reduction across Regions under Government Reward and Punishment Mechanism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-19, August.
    4. Sarkar, Mitali & Dey, Bikash Koli & Ganguly, Baishakhi & Saxena, Neha & Yadav, Dharmendra & Sarkar, Biswajit, 2023. "The impact of information sharing and bullwhip effects on improving consumer services in dual-channel retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    5. Shuxia Li & Yuedan Zu & Huimin Fang & Liping Liu & Tijun Fan, 2021. "Design Optimization of a HAZMAT Multimodal Hub-and-Spoke Network with Detour," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-18, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matsui, Kenji, 2018. "When and what wholesale and retail prices should be set in multi-channel supply chains?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(2), pages 540-554.
    2. Syed Asif Raza, 2022. "A bibliometric analysis of pricing models in supply chain," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(2), pages 228-251, April.
    3. Yang, Shilei & Shi, Victor & Jackson, Jonathan E., 2015. "Manufacturers׳ channel structures when selling asymmetric competing products," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PB), pages 641-651.
    4. Jiang, Xiaodan & Fan, Houming & Luo, Meifeng & Xu, Zhenlin, 2020. "Strategic port competition in multimodal network development considering shippers’ choice," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 68-89.
    5. Matsui, Kenji, 2019. "A supply chain member should set its margin later if another member's cost is highly uncertain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(1), pages 127-138.
    6. Li, Hai & Shao, Jing & Zhu, Stuart X., 2018. "Parallel importation in a supply Chain: The impact of gray market structure," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 220-241.
    7. Li, Gang & Huang, Feng Feng & Cheng, T.C.E. & Zheng, Quan & Ji, Ping, 2014. "Make-or-buy service capacity decision in a supply chain providing after-sales service," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(2), pages 377-388.
    8. Zheng, Wei & Li, Bo & Song, Dong-Ping, 2017. "Effects of risk-aversion on competing shipping lines’ pricing strategies with uncertain demands," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 337-356.
    9. Li, Wei & Chen, Jing, 2018. "Pricing and quality competition in a brand-differentiated supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 97-108.
    10. Kumoi, Yuki & Matsubayashi, Nobuo, 2014. "Vertical integration with endogenous contract leadership: Stability and fair profit allocation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(1), pages 221-232.
    11. Hu, Yihong & Qu, Shengnan & Li, Guo & Sethi, Suresh P., 2021. "Power structure and channel integration strategy for online retailers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(3), pages 951-964.
    12. Li, Hai & Shao, Jing & Zhu, Stuart X., 2020. "Impacts of power dynamics and gray markets on supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    13. Panagiotis Ypsilantis & Rob Zuidwijk, 2019. "Collaborative Fleet Deployment and Routing for Sustainable Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-26, October.
    14. Matsui, Kenji, 2016. "Asymmetric product distribution between symmetric manufacturers using dual-channel supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(2), pages 646-657.
    15. Wang, Zhenjie & Zhang, Dezhi & Tavasszy, Lóránt & Fazi, Stefano, 2023. "Integrated multimodal freight service network design and pricing with a competing service integrator and heterogeneous shipper classes," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    16. Izabela Nielsen & Sani Majumder & Eryk Szwarc & Subrata Saha, 2020. "Impact of Strategic Cooperation under Competition on Green Product Manufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-28, December.
    17. Stephen Okyere & Jiaqi Yang & Charles Anum Adams, 2022. "Optimizing the Sustainable Multimodal Freight Transport and Logistics System Based on the Genetic Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-21, September.
    18. Bender, Mark & Gal-Or, Esther & Geylani, Tansev, 2021. "Attracting artists to music streaming platforms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(3), pages 1083-1097.
    19. Zhou, Yong-Wu & Cao, Zong-Hong & Zhong, Yuanguang, 2015. "Pricing and alliance selection for a dominant retailer with an upstream entry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(1), pages 211-223.
    20. Xue, Weili & Caliskan Demirag, Ozgun & Niu, Baozhuang, 2014. "Supply chain performance and consumer surplus under alternative structures of channel dominance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(1), pages 130-145.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:153:y:2021:i:c:p:272-295. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.