IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v126y2023ics0264837722005452.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does the change of agricultural zoning policy achieve farmland protection in Taiwan?

Author

Listed:
  • Lu, Chen-Fu
  • Cheng, Chia-Yi

Abstract

Agricultural zoning is a measure used to sustain the orderly growth of agriculture and preserve prime farmland. However, research on the proclamation effects of actual economic impact and zoning effectiveness during policy transition is rare. This paper provides the first empirical evidence of the agricultural zoning effect on farmland use under policy change and the proposed amendatory Factory Management Act using the unique case of Taiwan. We apply a fixed-effects panel regression to explore the zoning effectiveness on farmland use with repeated cross-sectional zoning and rice fields data from a combination of geographic and management information systems in 2015 and 2017. It turns out that there is an apparent reduction in paddy fields within common agricultural zones of about 5.2 ha on a village basis, suggesting that the zoning policy did not achieve the aim of farmland conservation. Before the new zoning map takes effect, farmland loss could total more than 75,000 ha. The significant adverse impacts of the industrial workforce, land price of industrial zones, and relative price ratios of industrial and residential verse agricultural zones on farmland use may reveal the intense competing interests and land use between industries. Our findings also show that the entire farming workforce is still aging and less educated, which is detrimental to improving sustainable farming development. Strict law enforcement and consistent policy are required to correct these distortions of farmland.

Suggested Citation

  • Lu, Chen-Fu & Cheng, Chia-Yi, 2023. "Does the change of agricultural zoning policy achieve farmland protection in Taiwan?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:126:y:2023:i:c:s0264837722005452
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106518
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837722005452
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106518?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. B. James Deaton & Richard J. Vyn, 2010. "The Effect of Strict Agricultural Zoning on Agricultural Land Values: The Case of Ontario's Greenbelt," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 92(4), pages 941-955.
    2. David M. Henneberry & Richard L. Barrows, 1990. "Capitalization of Exclusive Agricultural Zoning into Farmland Prices," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 66(3), pages 249-258.
    3. McMillen, Daniel P. & McDonald, John F., 1991. "A Markov Chain model of zoning change," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 257-270, September.
    4. Tracy E. Stobbe & Alison J. Eagle & Geerte Cotteleer & G. Cornelis van Kooten, 2011. "Farmland Preservation Verdicts—Rezoning Agricultural Land in British Columbia," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 59(4), pages 555-572, December.
    5. Carmen Carrión-Flores & Elena G. Irwin, 2017. "A fixed effects logit model of rural land conversion and zoning," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 58(1), pages 181-208, January.
    6. Chang, Tsaiyu, 2012. "A Quantitative Analysis of the Farmland Conversion Problem in Taiwan," Journal of Rural Economics, Agricultural Economics Society of Japan, vol. 84(3), pages 1-13, December.
    7. Peter Mieszkowski & Edwin S. Mills, 1993. "The Causes of Metropolitan Suburbanization," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 7(3), pages 135-147, Summer.
    8. Schilling, Brian J. & Attavanich, Witsanu & Sullivan, Kevin P. & Marxen, Lucas J., 2014. "Measuring the effect of farmland preservation on farm profitability," MPRA Paper 100122, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Jun 2014.
    9. Ian Hardie & Erik Lichtenberg & Cynthia J. Nickerson, 2007. "Regulation, Open Space, and the Value of Land Undergoing Residential Subdivision," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 83(4), pages 458-474.
    10. Hung-Hao Chang & Tzu-Chin Lin, 2016. "Does the Minimum Lot Size Program Affect Farmland Values? Empirical Evidence Using Administrative Data and Regression Discontinuity Design in Taiwan," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 98(3), pages 785-801.
    11. Gregory, Allan W. & Head, Allen C., 1999. "Common and country-specific fluctuations in productivity, investment, and the current account," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 423-451, December.
    12. Tang, Peng & Feng, Yue & Li, Min & Zhang, Yanyan, 2021. "Can the performance evaluation change from central government suppress illegal land use in local governments? A new interpretation of Chinese decentralisation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    13. Joshua M. Duke & Lori Lynch, 2006. "Farmland Retention Techniques: Property Rights Implications and Comparative Evaluation," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 82(2), pages 189-213.
    14. Boussougou Boussougou, Guy & Sanz Sanz, Esther & Napoléone, Claude & Martinetti, Davide, 2021. "Identifying agricultural areas with potential for city connections: A regional-scale methodology for urban planning," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    15. Brinkley, Catherine, 2018. "High rugosity cities: The geographic, economic and regulatory pathology of America’s most non-concentric urban areas," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 215-224.
    16. Gao, Yuan & Tian, Li & Cao, Yandong & Zhou, Lin & Li, Zhibin & Hou, Deyi, 2019. "Supplying social infrastructure land for satisfying public needs or leasing residential land? A study of local government choices in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    17. Li, Xinyi & Ito, Junichi, 2021. "An empirical study of land rental development in rural Gansu, China: The role of agricultural cooperatives and transaction costs," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    18. Elena G. Irwin, 2002. "Interacting agents, spatial externalities and the evolution of residential land use patterns," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 2(1), pages 31-54, January.
    19. Richard J. Vyn, 2012. "Examining for Evidence of the Leapfrog Effect in the Context of Strict Agricultural Zoning," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 88(3), pages 457-477.
    20. Elena G. Irwin, 2010. "New Directions For Urban Economic Models Of Land Use Change: Incorporating Spatial Dynamics And Heterogeneity," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 65-91, February.
    21. Lee, Brian & Chang, Hung-Hao & Wang, Szu-Yung, 2021. "Solar power promotion plans, energy market liberalization, and farmland prices – Empirical evidence from Taiwan," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    22. Cynthia J. Nickerson & Lori Lynch, 2001. "The Effect of Farmland Preservation Programs on Farmland Prices," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 83(2), pages 341-351.
    23. McMillen, Daniel P. & McDonald, John F., 1991. "A simultaneous equations model of zoning and land values," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 55-72, May.
    24. Zhao, Qianyu & Bao, Helen X.H. & Zhang, Zhanlu, 2021. "Off-farm employment and agricultural land use efficiency in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    25. Daniel P. McMillen & John F. McDonald, 2002. "Land Values In A Newly Zoned City," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 84(1), pages 62-72, February.
    26. Xu, Xuegong & Hou, Lisheng & Lin, Huiping & Liu, Wenzheng, 2006. "Zoning of sustainable agricultural development in China," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 38-62, January.
    27. Robert A. Blewett & Julia I. Lane, 1988. "Development Rights and the Differential Assessment of Agricultural Land: Fractional Valuation of Farmland is Ineffective for Preserving Open Space and Subsidizes Speculation," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(2), pages 195-205, April.
    28. Jia, Mengyuan & Liu, Yan & Lieske, Scott N. & Chen, Tian, 2020. "Public policy change and its impact on urban expansion: An evaluation of 265 cities in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ze-Yung Wang & Kuo-Wei Chen, 2024. "Student-Led Campus Happiness Lunchboxes: Paying for Positive Impact," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Lu, Chen-Fu & Cheng, Chia-Yi, 2023. "Exploring the distribution of organic farming: Findings from certified rice in Taiwan," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carmen Carrión-Flores & Elena G. Irwin, 2017. "A fixed effects logit model of rural land conversion and zoning," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 58(1), pages 181-208, January.
    2. Lichtenberg, Erik & Tra, Constant & Hardie, Ian, 2007. "Land use regulation and the provision of open space in suburban residential subdivisions," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 199-213, September.
    3. B. James Deaton & Richard J. Vyn, 2015. "The Effect of Ontario's Greenbelt on the Price of Vacant Farmland," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 63(2), pages 185-208, June.
    4. Schilling, Brian J. & Sullivan, Kevin P. & Duke, Joshua M., 2013. "Do Residual Development Options Increase Preserved Farmland Values?," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 38(3), pages 1-17.
    5. Richard J. Vyn, 2012. "Examining for Evidence of the Leapfrog Effect in the Context of Strict Agricultural Zoning," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 88(3), pages 457-477.
    6. Jean-Sauveur Ay & Laure Latruffe, 2013. "The empirical content of the present value model: a survey of the instrumental uses of farmland prices," Working Papers hal-01208917, HAL.
    7. Grout, Cyrus A. & Jaeger, William K. & Plantinga, Andrew J., 2011. "Land-use regulations and property values in Portland, Oregon: A regression discontinuity design approach," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 98-107, March.
    8. Shertzer, Allison & Twinam, Tate & Walsh, Randall P., 2018. "Zoning and the economic geography of cities," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 20-39.
    9. Kathleen Segerson & Catherine L. Kling & Nancy E. Bockstael, 2022. "Contributions of women at the intersection of agricultural economics and environmental and natural resource economics," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(1), pages 38-53, March.
    10. Munneke, Henry J., 2005. "Dynamics of the urban zoning structure: An empirical investigation of zoning change," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(3), pages 455-473, November.
    11. Qingxu Huang & Dawn C Parker & Tatiana Filatova & Shipeng Sun, 2014. "A Review of Urban Residential Choice Models Using Agent-Based Modeling," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 41(4), pages 661-689, August.
    12. Joshua Duke & Lori Lynch, 2007. "Gauging support for innovative farmland preservation techniques," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 40(2), pages 123-155, June.
    13. Kane, Kevin & York, Abigail M., 2017. "Prices, policies, and place: What drives greenfield development?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 415-428.
    14. Magliocca, Nicholas & McConnell, Virginia & Walls, Margaret & Safirova, Elena, 2012. "Zoning on the urban fringe: Results from a new approach to modeling land and housing markets," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(1-2), pages 198-210.
    15. Marcy Burchfield & Henry G. Overman & Diego Puga & Matthew A. Turner, 2006. "Causes of Sprawl: A Portrait from Space," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 121(2), pages 587-633.
    16. Tracy Stobbe & Geerte Cotteleer & G. Cornelis van Kooten, 2008. "Hobby Farms and Protection of Farmland in British Columbia," Working Papers 2008-01, University of Victoria, Department of Economics, Resource Economics and Policy Analysis Research Group.
    17. Kathleen P. Bell & Timothy J. Dalton, 2007. "Spatial Economic Analysis in Data‐Rich Environments," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(3), pages 487-501, September.
    18. Dominique Peeters & Geoffrey Caruso & Jean Cavailhès & Isabelle Thomas & Pierre Frankhauser & Gilles Vuidel, 2015. "Emergence Of Leapfrogging From Residential Choice With Endogenous Green Space: Analytical Results," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(3), pages 491-512, June.
    19. Liu, Xiangping & Lynch, Lori, 2006. "Do Agricultural Preservation Programs Affect Farmland Conversion? Evidence from a Propensity Score Matching Estimator," Working Papers 28569, University of Maryland, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    20. Xiangping Liu & Lori Lynch, 2011. "Do Agricultural Land Preservation Programs Reduce Farmland Loss? Evidence from a Propensity Score Matching Estimator," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 87(2), pages 183-201.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:126:y:2023:i:c:s0264837722005452. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.