IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ijfaec/307653.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Impacts of Import Liberalization Policy On Agricultural Food Sector in Malaysia

Author

Listed:
  • Ali, Roslina Binti
  • Ahmad, Aimi Athirah
  • Safari, Suhana

Abstract

Deficient domestic production and supply while substantial requirements from both local food industries and final consumption largely dictate the government to remove a non-tariff barrier through implementing unrestricted quota policy for beef, mutton, and coffee in Malaysia. Previous studies discovered varied impacts of the non-tariff barrier removal across countries and commodities. After approximately five years of implementation, it is pertinent to evaluate the impacts of import quota removal on both sides – local industries and consumers to those primary commodities. A secondary database was utilized before and after the quota removal period. The major quantitative methods, nonparametric trend test, and multivariate dummy regression were applied to identify the monotonic trends and to estimate the effects of quota removal, respectively, focusing on value-added exports and market prices. Before the regression analysis, diagnostic tests were conducted to confirm the validity of each estimated model. Following the implementation of liberalized import policy, all commodities experienced significant impacts, however, the impacts and magnitude differ considerably – value-added beef exports decreased as larger than mutton while value-added exportsfor coffee increased. The market prices significantly increased in both livestock commodities with mutton was nearly twice as a beef increment. Besides, the trend analysis indicated declining imports with increasing market prices for both beef and mutton after the quota removal, yet, coffee showed contrary effects. While the trade theory promises better off after removing non-tariff barriers, this study found different consequences between commodities across economic indicators at the national level.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali, Roslina Binti & Ahmad, Aimi Athirah & Safari, Suhana, 2020. "Economic Impacts of Import Liberalization Policy On Agricultural Food Sector in Malaysia," International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics (IJFAEC), Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Department of Economics and Finance, vol. 8(4), October.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ijfaec:307653
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.307653
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/307653/files/vol8.no4.pp325.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.307653?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James Harrigan & Geoffrey Barrows, 2009. "Testing the Theory of Trade Policy: Evidence from the Abrupt End of the Multifiber Arrangement," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 91(2), pages 282-294, May.
    2. Irene Brambilla & Amit K. Khandelwal & Peter K. Schott, 2010. "China's Experience under the Multi-Fiber Arrangement (MFA) and the Agreement on Textiles and Clothing (ATC)," NBER Chapters, in: China's Growing Role in World Trade, pages 345-387, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Olivier Cadot & Julien Gourdon & Frank van Tongeren, 2018. "Estimating Ad Valorem Equivalents of Non-Tariff Measures: Combining Price-Based and Quantity-Based Approaches," OECD Trade Policy Papers 215, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patrick Conway & Marco Fugazza & M. Kerem Yuksel, 2013. "TURKISH ENTERPRISE-LEVEL RESPONSE TO FOREIGN TRADE LIBERALIZATION: The Removal of Agreements on Textiles and Clothing Quotas," UNCTAD Blue Series Papers 59, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
    2. Lawrence Edwards & Robert Z. Lawrence, 2014. "AGOA Rules: The Intended and Unintended Consequences of Special Fabric Provisions," NBER Chapters, in: African Successes, Volume III: Modernization and Development, pages 343-393, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Pavcnik, Nina & Goldberg, Pinelopi, 2016. "The Effects of Trade Policy," CEPR Discussion Papers 11104, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    4. Rotunno, Lorenzo & Vézina, Pierre-Louis & Wang, Zheng, 2013. "The rise and fall of (Chinese) African apparel exports," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 152-163.
    5. Pierre-Louis Vezina & Lorenzo Rotunno, 2013. "In-bond Diversion," Economics Series Working Papers 664, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    6. Gebreeyesus M., 2013. "The End of the Multifibre Arrangement (MFA) and the Heterogeneous Performance of Quota-Constrained Countries," MERIT Working Papers 2013-035, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    7. Amit K. Khandelwal & Peter K. Schott & Shang-Jin Wei, 2013. "Trade Liberalization and Embedded Institutional Reform: Evidence from Chinese Exporters," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 103(6), pages 2169-2195, October.
    8. Defever, Fabrice & Heid, Benedikt & Larch, Mario, 2015. "Spatial exporters," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 145-156.
    9. Martin, Julien & Mejean, Isabelle, 2014. "Low-wage country competition and the quality content of high-wage country exports," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 140-152.
    10. Rotunno, Lorenzo & Vézina, Pierre-Louis & Wang, Zheng, 2013. "The rise and fall of (Chinese) African apparel exports," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 152-163.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ijfaec:307653. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iiaaktr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.